DOC
|
Robert, Found that the issue had nothing to do with your amazing eSearch widget at all! The issue was that some of the records didn't have a spatial location hence the error code with X and Y values having null values or NaN as shown in the web console error above. The search aliases that were functioning correctly weren't querying the records without spatial locations. I def queried out those records without a correct Shape value and now everything is working correctly. A good lesson to always check data first. Thanks for your help and suggestions, Andrew
... View more
12-02-2016
08:37 AM
|
1
|
0
|
4786
|
DOC
|
Robert, Is the image below the type of browser web console log you were looking for? I'm seeing this same error for Search Aliases that are working correctly too. There were an X and Y field in the Feature Class but were hidden in the MXD used to publish the service. I just deleted those fields thinking perhaps they were somehow related to the error messages below but am still seeing the issue. Thanks, Andrew
... View more
11-30-2016
12:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4786
|
DOC
|
Hi Robert, I have a search layer with multiple search aliases setup. Except for one of the aliases, the results returned zoom to the correct extent, show the result records, and shows the basemap (Esri Imagery). However, one of the aliases for some reason when returning results zooms to a blank extent and while the pop-ups still show the result record icons do not. If I click the Default Extent the extent changes and shows basemap and the record results in my area of interest. If I click on a record in the AT, the extent changes to zoom to that record and shows the icon and basemap. All other search aliases for that layer are working correctly. I've removed and readded the alias with no luck. Below is are the I'm getting Status Code: 304 Not Modified Any idea what might be causing this issue? Thanks, Andrew
... View more
11-30-2016
11:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4785
|
DOC
|
Robert, Thank you for looking into the issue and all your hard work on these incredible widgets. Thanks again, Andrew
... View more
09-15-2016
10:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3622
|
DOC
|
Robert, I tested multiple services with layers containing number fields (type: short, long, or double). For number fields with null values, the unique values search function would not return values. I'm using Server 10.3.1 and eSearch 2.1.1. Thanks, Andrew
... View more
09-14-2016
08:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3622
|
DOC
|
Hi Robert, I'm using your Enhanced Search widget 2.1. Great widget! I'm setting up a search on various feature classes with less than 100 records and field type: Short integer. I've setup many other searches and they work great. However, I've tried to setup a query with Year Constructed is then select from unique values. In the preview screen and deployed apps, the short integer search on Year Constructed does not seem to be working. Just keeps saying it's retrieving unique values but never returns anything. Other queries using "is" and unique values works great and returns in seconds but they haven't used short integer fields. Any idea what could be causing this hangup?
... View more
09-07-2016
11:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3622
|
POST
|
Hi Tim, I replaced my original Coordinate folder with the one you provided above to get the scale. This is great! However, I'm using WAB 2.0 and noticed that the scale now sits on top of the scale bar and loses the darker WAB 2.0 Coordinate style that makes the coordinates more pronounced. Thoughts? Thanks, Andrew
... View more
05-13-2016
11:43 AM
|
0
|
19
|
1373
|
DOC
|
Robert, Apologies, I forgot to mention that I was using an older version of the widget (1.2.0.6). Perhaps my download was behaving oddly or this issue has since been fixed. In my 1.2.0.6 version, even though the actual SQL wouldn't be edited, a user could enter values into the input box and might think those values would be used.... I just tested your latest 2.0.1 version with WABDE 2.0 and it worked as desired. Thanks, Andrew
... View more
04-20-2016
09:33 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3563
|
POST
|
Thanks Mike. Good info. The functionality you describe would be much appreciated.
... View more
03-02-2016
03:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1834
|
POST
|
Jake Skinner I turned on the Create tiles on demand option but this increased my server utilization significantly. When I use the ESRI basemaps, it doesn't seem like tiles are being generated on the fly. Can you confirm? Any thoughts to the questions I posted above? Thanks in advance, Andrew
... View more
02-29-2016
01:33 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1834
|
POST
|
Hi Jake, We're using ArcGIS for Server 10.3.1 cached map services. I do not have the "Create tiles on demand" checked. Idea being that smaller scales (LODs 1-19) are fully tiled then as users access the larger scales, tiles are generated on-demand? Is this how ESRI Imagery is setup? Are new tiles were being generated at these larger scales (1:70) or are the tiles being shown at this scale actually tiles from a smaller scale (1:1128 say) and they were just coming through as pixelated at 1:70....that would actually be great I'm somewhat concerned about this approach with users creating too many tiles on-demand and utilizing server resources but perhaps that's the tradeoff. Thanks
... View more
02-26-2016
01:35 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1834
|
POST
|
I have created the same LODs for my basemap that ESRI Imagery uses. While both the ESRI Imagery basemap and my basemap have LODs for 1:70.53 scale, there are no tiles that have been created for those scales in either service. The ESRI Imagery service shows pixelated tiles from previous, smaller scales but my basemap just shows a grey background. Is there a reason that the ESRI basemaps show pixelated tiles further zoomed in while my basemaps are simply grey? For example, my basemap has LODs for 1:70 and 1:140 but the largest scale tiles were created for was at 1:1128. When I zoom in to 1:70 in ArcGIS Online or WAB DE the background is grey. Even though the ESRI Imagery hasn't been tiled at 1:70, the tiles from the 1:1128 LOD show up, albeit pixelated. I did notice that when printing at a scale larger scale via ArcGIS Online or WAB DE my basemaps do show pixelated tiles from the smaller scales when in the actual app the background is grey. Any ideas what is going on here? Thanks, Andrew
... View more
02-26-2016
12:49 PM
|
3
|
14
|
5131
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 10-20-2015 06:54 AM | |
1 | 06-13-2018 11:10 AM | |
3 | 02-26-2016 12:49 PM | |
1 | 12-02-2016 08:37 AM | |
1 | 03-20-2015 06:22 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:23 AM
|