|
POST
|
Could you please clarify the details of your problem? Specifically: Are you using the ArcGIS Online services, or are you using a local network dataset? Are you using the ribbon UI, or are you using geoprocessing tools, python, etc.? Are you getting an error message when you choose to split the polygons, or is it just accepting the split option and giving you overlapping polygons in the result? If the former, please paste the error message. If the latter, please post a screenshot.
... View more
05-14-2019
02:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4926
|
|
POST
|
Here are a few possible causes of this problem: 1) The ferry stations are somehow physically disconnected from the rest of the network. Use the Network Identify tool to make sure the ferry lines are connected to stop connectors and the stop connectors are connected to the streets, and those streets are adequately connected to other streets. 2) If they ferry data came from a separate GTFS dataset, make sure the analysis date and time are during a period when the ferries have service. This section of the Troubleshooting Guide might help a little, and keep in mind that the date range needs to work for all input GTFS datasets you used to create the network.
... View more
05-14-2019
10:02 AM
|
0
|
2
|
4573
|
|
POST
|
Hello Massimo. Theoretically this should work, and we are investigating why it doesn't.
... View more
05-09-2019
08:38 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2759
|
|
POST
|
Could you please clarify whether your network dataset uses public transit data (created using the Add GTFS to a Network Dataset toolbox) or whether this is just a general network dataset for walking and driving?
... View more
04-23-2019
01:08 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1011
|
|
POST
|
This network dataset seems to be working properly to me. You did a good job setting it up. The screenshots here clearly show evidence of the transit lines being used. I picked Monday at 8am. Make sure you're choosing the correct settings for your analysis layers.
... View more
04-17-2019
09:47 AM
|
1
|
1
|
2832
|
|
POST
|
It sounds like you've checked all the things I would normally suggest you check. Can you share the geodatabase so I can take a look?
... View more
04-17-2019
08:13 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2832
|
|
POST
|
The Step 1 – Preprocess Buffers tool (BetterBusBuffers Count Trips in Polygon Buffers around Stops) does a lot of complicated geometry operations. If your transit agency is huge (doesn't sound like it's that huge...) or if your buffer size is very large, it may take a really long time to perform these calculations. Also, if you're using a shapefile network dataset, it might be slower than a file geodatabase network dataset. If your network dataset's source feature classes don't have a spatial index for some reason, this will make things extremely slow. You might also just be running out of memory in ArcMap. ArcMap is an older 32-bit application that cannot make use of the full memory resources of your computer. Try running this tool in ArcGIS Pro, which can handle larger problems much more easily.
... View more
04-16-2019
01:52 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1681
|
|
POST
|
It's working fine for me also. (I am the developer of those tools.) Do other geoprocessing tools successfully produce output? I suggest you check if you have the same problem with other tools. Regardless, you might need to call Esri Support in your country. It sounds like a problem with your particular installation or something.
... View more
04-16-2019
08:41 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1729
|
|
POST
|
This is the same question as https://community.esri.com/message/843640-re-hello-i-have-a-problem-at-the-last-stage-of-add-gtfs-to-a-network-which-is-get-network-eids-when-i-am-running-this-tool-i-am-getting-the-following-error-this-application-could-not-initialize-with-the-correct-arcgis-license-and-will-shutdownlicense-me
... View more
04-05-2019
08:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1227
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately not. Several users have reported this problem, but I'm unable to reproduce it, and I can't find a solution to it. Have you tried the simple executable linked above, and did it fail with the same error? If so, please call Esri Support.
... View more
04-05-2019
08:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3976
|
|
POST
|
Oh, yeah, I know what you're talking about. This is an artifact of the old (ArcMap) detailed polygon generation algorithm and how it interacts with the trim settings. We have improved the way detailed polygons are generated for ArcGIS Pro, so if you solve this same problem in Pro, you'll probably see cleaner results. This also demonstrates the reason why I suggest using an OD Cost Matrix analysis for applications where you care about determining which locations are within a certain distance of some origin point. It's more accurate and more consistent than overlaying Service Area polygons.
... View more
04-05-2019
08:27 AM
|
0
|
4
|
4573
|
|
POST
|
Horia Popa wrote: Hello Melinda, Thank you for getting back to me, I'll check those links. As a matter of fact I had, for a while now, a number of questions regarding Network Analysis with GTFS data but I waited to gather more experience and information (including reading your other answers) before posting them. The ArcGIS Pro issue just came up as a requirement to use it for a project, I have been using ArcMap. A little background info: I am ranking sites in NYC using multiple weighted criteria, one of them being proximity to public transit. Originally I approached the issue by creating a 0.3 mile buffer around every site and giving points for how many subway or bus stations are within. Then I started to look into Network Analysis and now I want to use a this workflow/ process. ^ A better approach is to use the Origin-Destination Cost Matrix tool instead of Service Area (or Buffer). Rather than using the buffer to identify which transit stations are within the buffer, using the OD Cost Matrix gives you the precise network distance to from each site to each transit stop within your time/distance limit. This is a much more accurate calculation, and you avoid problems with strange Service Area polygons like you mention below. Service Area is more of a visualization tool. 1. Do you think it's OK to mix the use of ArcMap and ArcGIS Pro for the same project? Like, to use the best of each. Yes, that's fine, although as mentioned previously, the Add GTFS to a Network Dataset tool is not supported in Pro. You might also find some functionality available in ArcMap that is not available in Pro and some newer functionality that is in Pro that is not in ArcMap. Use the best tool, or combination of tools, for the job. 2. I created a NYC network dataset consisting only of streets and GTFS data, subway and buses (local and express). The resulting file was 1.6 GB! I then played around with it, doing some Service Area and Route Analysis tests. ^ By this, I assume you mean you used the Add GTFS to a Network Dataset toolbox. Please clarify because that makes a difference in my advice and the expected behavior. The large file size is not surprising. If you look at the size of the original GTFS data, I imagine it will be similar. New York has a lot of transit. Service Area. In some cases (I created more than one network dataset) there is a discrepancy between the results if I use time (minutes) or distance as Impedance, distance being correct. I might not have set something properly somewhere, I'll go over that again. Any comments regarding troubleshooting? If your network includes public transit via the Add GTFS to a Network Dataset toolbox, then the travel time includes journeys by public transit. The distance calculation will depend on how you configured your evaluators to calculate distance along the transit lines. Technically, you shouldn't do this at all. The transit lines should be restricted when optimizing based on distance because the transit lines from Add GTFS to a Network Dataset are not representative of the actual paths through the network taken by the transit vehicles. They are a logical connection between connected stops, and the transit evaluator uses the schedules to determine the travel time if you're optimizing based on time. But, earlier you said you were just trying to find which transit stops were within a certain distance of your potential sites. If that's the case, you don't need the Add GTFS to a Network Dataset tool or the network created with it at all. Networks created with Add GTFS to a Network Dataset allow you to calculate the travel time from one place to another by public transit. So, the travelers are actually walking along the streets, getting on the transit lines and riding, then walking to their destination. If you only need to know which transit stops are within a short walk of your potential sites, then you actually just need a network dataset of streets without the transit in the network. The transit stops in this case would function as destinations in an Origin-Destination Cost Matrix analysis, not part of the network itself. If I use Default Breaks, the areas closer to the facility are generated with less detail. Can that be changed? I'm not sure what you mean by this. Can you post a screenshot and clarify what polygon generation settings you're using? Route I tried to check the accuracy of the result and I don't know, it's not an easy task. Somehow I thought that one would be able to "see" the route: from point A walk to this bus station, take this bus route to this stop, walk to this subway station, take this subway line to this stop, walk to point B. The route cannot be properly displayed because it follows the created Transit lines. And by using the Network Identify Tool, the result is in "network speak" (Edges 48095 Transit Lines) instead of " subway, Q line, between DeKalb and Canal". How do you visualize the results? Can something similar to driving directions be generated? How much do you trust the results? Technical limitations in Network Analyst prevent me from being able to show the names and details of the transit lines in Directions and in Network Identify. However, if you solve a Route, you can get some further details about the transit lines used by post-processing the route using the Copy Traversed Source Features (with Transit) tool, which is included in the Add GTFS to a network Dataset download. I trust that the results are as accurate as the GTFS schedules and the Network Analyst algorithms allow, given the limitations of the tools as described here. Changing the location of the stops I occasionally get this message, without an apparent cause: Warning: Location "ABC" in "Stops" is on a non-traversable network element position. Warning: Cannot preserve last location "ABC" in "Stops" because it is invalid. Error: "Stops" does not contain valid input for any route How do I troubleshoot this? Your network dataset probably has one or more restriction attributes, and your points are located on parts of the network that are restricted. Consequently, they can't be reached. There's a setting in your network analysis layer properties that can help with that. Info is here. 3. Regarding my project, on one hand is the accessibility to public transit which in my case will consist of subway, bus and ferry. This would be answering the question What level of transit service does a site have access to? The other would be to analyze the travel time to major areas like Downtown and Midtown Manhattan, where the majority of people commute to work. I can create a service area with 10 breaks, covering the entire city, with 2 facilities (Downtown and Midtown Manhattan) and than assign scores respective to the area where each site is located. How would you go about it? Take a look at this Story Map for some ideas.
... View more
04-04-2019
11:33 AM
|
0
|
6
|
4573
|
|
POST
|
Hello Horia. You didn't say which tools you're trying to use. The Add GTFS to a Network Dataset toolbox and the network datasets created with it are not supported in ArcGIS Pro. If you're trying to use this tool, it won't work at all. The good news is that we are working very hard to make this functionality supported in the next release of ArcGIS Pro. If you are using the other tools described on this site, they should work in ArcGIS Pro. However, as you've noticed, the workflows and user interface are different from ArcMap. You can find some documentation and several tutorials for Network Analyst in ArcGIS Pro here. There are also some network dataset properties that do not yet appear in the network dataset properties pages. ArcGIS Pro is a newer product that does not yet have all the functionality of ArcMap. If you have more specific questions about properties or workflows, feel free to post again, and maybe I can answer your questions or point you toward further resources.
... View more
04-03-2019
08:43 PM
|
1
|
8
|
4573
|
|
POST
|
Hello Tommy. I found the bug. The values in your GTFS data's stop_name field are very long, and they were exceeding the length of the field in the output feature class. I should have been handling that situation. I have made an update to the tool to truncate overlong text values. You can download the latest version of the toolbox from http://arcg.is/0yr9fr, or you can just download the updated BBB_SharedFunctions.py file and replace your existing one. Post again if you have further problems.
... View more
04-02-2019
10:32 AM
|
1
|
1
|
2639
|
|
POST
|
Can you post the GTFS dataset you're using? I can give it a try and see if I can reproduce the problem.
... View more
04-01-2019
08:40 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2639
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06-12-2026 01:53 PM | |
| 1 | 04-21-2026 08:39 AM | |
| 1 | 04-15-2026 02:24 PM | |
| 1 | 02-03-2026 11:41 AM | |
| 1 | 03-16-2026 08:58 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|