Select to view content in your preferred language

What is the difference between horizontal transformations using the ArcMap Project Tool and NOAA VDatum for transforming WGS84 (ITRF00) to NAD83? Which one is more accurate?

2483
1
Jump to solution
06-29-2016 02:50 PM
KelseyMcDonald
Deactivated User

I've noticed a ~30cm horizontal difference between data that I transformed from WGS84 (ITRF00) to NAD83 using the ArcMap Project Tool and the same points transformed using NOAA's Vertical Datum Transformation Tool (VDatum). Is there a difference in the parameters used in these transformations? Is one more accurate? Or did I do something funky? Unfortunately, this small of an error could make a big difference for my data, which was collected by RTK and should be accurate to ~2cm. I saw that the WGS_1984_(ITRF00)_To_NAD_1983 transformation has an accuracy of 0.10m, which is less accurate than I would like. It seems like the difference between the two should not be more than 3x the published accuracy, so I think I must be missing something. Let me know if you have thoughts on the best transformation method to use. Thank you for your help!!

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
MelitaKennedy
Esri Notable Contributor

If your data's RTK then it's not on NAD 1983. You'll get access to other transformations if you use a later realization like NAD 1983 (2011) or NSRS2007. I would recommend using WGS_1984_(ITRF08)_To_NAD_1983_2011 instead, for instance.

Equation-based transformations (coordinate frame, position vector, Molodensky-Badekas, geocentric translations) will also give (slightly) different results if you run them with or without ellipsoidal heights.

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
1 Reply
MelitaKennedy
Esri Notable Contributor

If your data's RTK then it's not on NAD 1983. You'll get access to other transformations if you use a later realization like NAD 1983 (2011) or NSRS2007. I would recommend using WGS_1984_(ITRF08)_To_NAD_1983_2011 instead, for instance.

Equation-based transformations (coordinate frame, position vector, Molodensky-Badekas, geocentric translations) will also give (slightly) different results if you run them with or without ellipsoidal heights.

0 Kudos