Greetings,
I'm trying to better understand the behavior of the Loops trace. In this case, I'm specifically trying to use a Loops trace to identify dead ends and I'm using the Naperville sample data in a FGDB. For the most part, running the trace as id returns about what I'd expect. However, there are some oddities, such as why the DMA in the upper left corner is not selected.
Drilling in to the north central section, there is an obvious loop outlined here in pink.
Additionally, there are some other single-segments throughout the system that appear they should be part of a larger loop. This is from the far southest corner.
My question is whether this is an artifact of the sample data or something in how the Loops trace functions.
Many thanks,
Mike