Survey123 website pointing to stakeholder view instead of the source layer

[LorettaWinton1]

Hello,

I have a survey (entitled R10_FHP_GDS) from which a webmap and dashboard are available to all of our group members. For public consumption have the same products available but used the automatically created "stakeholder" view. By design, several fields (for example, Creator, CreationDate and many others) are not visible in that public layer. However, when my team members log in to the S123 website it is pointing to that stakeholder view instead of the source layer. Evidenced by 1) the lack of the Creator field (and all the other fields) I excluded from public view, and 2) the map brought up from the "Open in Map Viewer" on the S123 website. On that map, it is labeled R10_FHP_GDS but the layer says it is the stakeholder view. When I am logged in as the administrator none of this happens and I see the full source dataset. 

My question is how do I change that surveys' dataset  back to the source layer and NOT pointing to the stakeholder view.

Thanks,

Lori

[ChristopherCounsell · Accepted solution]

https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/faq-what-are-the-fieldworker-and-stakeholder-hosted-vi...

Stakeholder (results) view is what is used by non owners in survey123 website.

Survey forms will submit against a form view or the original feature service. 

I would NOT use the stakeholder view for public consumption. Better to create a new view that is not managed by survey 123 website and can be configured freely.

You will probably need to:

• Create a new view and replace the stakeholder view in your public maps/apps. Depending on effort you could consider python or assistant tools 
• Configure each view or the original service for the desired access and editing permissions. This will be the original service or form view (field submission), stakeholder view (internal survey access) and the new view (public sharing).

The survey123 website otherwise appears to be using the correct view as designed for non owners (stakeholder/results).

[LorettaWinton1]

Doh! I probably should have known that. Thank you ChristopherCounsell!