Hi,
For my MA degree I'm currently studying the breeding ponds for a salamander species on an Air Force Base. I would like to determine the connectivity between ponds by performing a Least Cost Path analysis. I am a novice when it comes to ArcGIS and am having difficulty determining how to have multiple starting and ending points. I would like each pond to be a start and end point and to find the connectivity between all of them. What is the best way to do this? Thanks in advance!
Alex
you can have multiple origins and destinations in least cost path, although not all destinations may be reachec
Check the details here
Creating the least-cost path—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop from this link
Cost Path—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop
And spend some time examining your cost surface in details. Most people skirt the issue and focus on the path part. You should really spend some time examining how the variation in the costs associated with your surface properties affect the overall paths. You might also want to look at PathDistance and Corridor analysis tools within the overall toolset
An overview of the Distance toolset—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop
you can do some pretty useful stuff if the underlying fundamentals of costs, their attributition and effects are known and understood
I have my cost surface figured out for the most part. I was wondering if there was a way to make the ponds both starting points and destinations. I would like to find the connectivity between them.
well you won't be able to define the starts and ends at the same time as you create your cost distance origins, since they will just loop back on to themselves. When you run the cost distance, they are from an origin point or points and radiate outwards. When you run the cost path, you start at the destinations and find the shortest path back to the origins... so if you have the origins and destinations at the same location, then it will go nowhere. For instance, a Path distance between two separate points on two separate ponds, might allow you to examine the directional differences between them. In a simple cost distance, it is highly likely the path from A to B is the same as B to A, however in path distance analysis, you can factor in directional costs, potentially resulting in different paths between the point pairs.
So does that mean for my 12 ponds I have to do each as a starting location
with all the others as ending locations? I'm just not sure the best way to
set it up.
It is hard to see whether there would be any spatial glitches/potential idiosyncracies unless I saw the image. I can envision a variety of scenarios.... I would begin with that as a start to at least get your costs from the various points. You should easily be able to rule out ponds that have absolutely being the 'nearest' connection.
I wouldn't expect you to save any time by trying to do everything at once.... and you haven't mentioned corridor analysis, if that is your intent, which may be tangential but related
Ok I'll try a few things out and let you know how it goes. Thanks for the
help!