Latest Contributions by KunomBersh

‎06-02-2020

I have mxd with 3 layers #each of the 3 layers has a definition query applied to it TERMINAL_NAME = 'AAAAAA' #filters the number of features displayed At #10.2.2 environment, this command creates the .geodatabase (ArcGIS Runtime) # python 2.7 # data is in Oracle 11g SDE version 10.0 # data is in Oracle 12c SDE version 10.7.1 - currently being tested # this file has the FILTERED records in it when viewing with ArcGIS Runtime, or a sqllite browser At #10.7.1 environment, this command creates the .geodatabase (ArcGIS Runtime) # python 2.7 # data is in Oracle 11g SDE version 10.0 # data is in Oracle 12c SDE version 10.7.1 # this file has the ENTIRE DATASET OF RECORDS in it when viewing with ArcGIS Runtime, or a sqllite browser # Process: Create Runtime Content arcpy.CreateRuntimeContent_management(RuntimeInput, DotGeodatabase, "", "", "DEFAULT", "NETWORK_DATA;FEATURE_AND_TABULAR_DATA", "NON_OPTIMIZE_SIZE", "ONLINE", "PNG", "1", "")! The point is after extracting the mxd , in 10.2.2 it works perfectly in creating the Dot geodatabase for the selected MXD , however in 10.7.1 it create the Dot geodatabase but with all MXD layers, not from the selected one , in the other hand by using the arcmap save as arcgis runtime content it works but not friendly with python, is there any patch file to fix this

‎10-11-2018

If this help OBJECTID X Y Z 1 -9912775 4941760 799.2415 2 -9912775 4941761 799.2293 3 -9912776 4941762 799.2181 4 -9912777 4941763 799.2112 5 -9912778 4941764 799.209 6 -9912778 4941765 799.2097 7 -9912779 4941766 799.2114 8 -9912780 4941767 799.2168 9 -9912781 4941769 799.2236 10 -9912781 4941770 799.2313 11 -9912782 4941771 799.2404 12 -9912783 4941772 799.2533 13 -9912783 4941773 799.2662 14 -9912784 4941774 799.2735 15 -9912785 4941775 799.2767 16 -9912785 4941776 799.2816 17 -9912786 4941778 799.2919 18 -9912787 4941779 799.3056 19 -9912787 4941780 799.3157 20 -9912788 4941781 799.3154 21 -9912788 4941782 799.3109 22 -9912789 4941782 799.3076 23 -9912789 4941783 799.2908 24 -9912790 4941784 799.2706 25 -9912790 4941786 799.2495 26 -9912791 4941787 799.2285 27 -9912792 4941788 799.2075 28 -9912792 4941789 799.1864 29 -9912793 4941790 799.1654 30 -9912794 4941791 799.1443 31 -9912794 4941793 799.1233 32 -9912795 4941794 799.1023 33 -9912795 4941795 799.0812 34 -9912796 4941796 799.0602 35 -9912797 4941797 799.0404 36 -9912797 4941797 799.0391 37 -9912797 4941798 799.0181 38 -9912798 4941800 798.9971 39 -9912799 4941801 798.976 40 -9912799 4941802 798.955 41 -9912800 4941803 798.9342 42 -9912800 4941804 798.9146 43 -9912801 4941805 798.8954 44 -9912802 4941807 798.8756 45 -9912802 4941808 798.8538 46 -9912803 4941809 798.8242 47 -9912804 4941810 798.7867 48 -9912804 4941811 798.7425 49 -9912805 4941812 798.6963 50 -9912805 4941813 798.683 51 -9912805 4941813 798.653 52 -9912806 4941815 798.6123 53 -9912807 4941816 798.5735 54 -9912807 4941817 798.5344 55 -9912808 4941818 798.4982 56 -9912809 4941819 798.4673 57 -9912809 4941820 798.4457 58 -9912810 4941822 798.4284 59 -9912810 4941823 798.4145 60 -9912811 4941824 798.4006 61 -9912811 4941825 798.39 62 -9912812 4941825 798.3826 63 -9912812 4941826 798.3574 64 -9912813 4941827 798.3253 65 -9912814 4941829 798.2879 66 -9912814 4941830 798.2465 67 -9912815 4941831 798.2021 68 -9912815 4941832 798.1575 69 -9912816 4941833 798.1141 70 -9912817 4941834 798.0771 71 -9912817 4941835 798.0486 72 -9912818 4941837 798.0263 73 -9912819 4941838 798.0092 74 -9912819 4941839 797.9945 75 -9912820 4941840 797.98 76 -9912821 4941841 797.9674 77 -9912821 4941842 797.962 78 -9912822 4941843 797.9667 79 -9912823 4941845 797.9784 80 -9912823 4941846 797.99 81 -9912824 4941847 797.998 82 -9912825 4941848 798.0028 83 -9912825 4941849 798.0045 84 -9912826 4941850 798.002 85 -9912827 4941851 797.9969 86 -9912828 4941852 797.9919 87 -9912828 4941854 797.9875 88 -9912829 4941855 797.9814 89 -9912830 4941856 797.9724 90 -9912830 4941857 797.9611 91 -9912831 4941858 797.9479 92 -9912832 4941859 797.9317 93 -9912833 4941860 797.9119 94 -9912833 4941861 797.8921 95 -9912834 4941862 797.8757 96 -9912835 4941863 797.8628 97 -9912835 4941865 797.851 98 -9912836 4941866 797.8403 99 -9912837 4941867 797.8343 100 -9912838 4941868 797.8315 101 -9912838 4941869 797.8311 102 -9912839 4941870 797.8284 103 -9912840 4941871 797.8216 104 -9912841 4941872 797.8121 105 -9912842 4941873 797.8044 106 -9912842 4941874 797.8014 107 -9912843 4941875 797.8087 108 -9912844 4941876 797.8206 109 -9912845 4941877 797.8306 110 -9912845 4941878 797.8365 111 -9912846 4941880 797.8416 112 -9912847 4941881 797.8509 113 -9912848 4941882 797.8697 114 -9912849 4941883 797.8926 115 -9912849 4941884 797.9158 116 -9912850 4941885 797.9366 117 -9912851 4941886 797.9515 118 -9912852 4941887 797.9579 119 -9912852 4941888 797.9564 120 -9912853 4941889 797.9519 121 -9912854 4941890 797.9506 122 -9912855 4941891 797.9586 123 -9912856 4941892 797.9795 124 -9912856 4941893 798.0113 125 -9912857 4941894 798.0506 126 -9912858 4941895 798.089 127 -9912859 4941896 798.1145 128 -9912860 4941898 798.1302 129 -9912860 4941899 798.1413 130 -9912861 4941900 798.1485 131 -9912862 4941901 798.1525 132 -9912863 4941902 798.1537 133 -9912863 4941903 798.154 134 -9912865 4941905 798.154

‎10-10-2018

Thanks Dan Patterson, your input is helpful all the time , but I need to go further, please refer drawing The intention is to find out which point has slope percentage out of the range (-0.05 to 0.05), if the average slope from p1 to p2 is in the range “pass or ignore”, and compare p1 to p3 if the slope within the range, jump to compare p1 to p4 if the slope is out of the range, record p4 as deflation point, then start compare from p4 to p5, if it is within the range pass, compare p4 to p6 if it is out of the range record p6 and then again start from p6, and compare p6 to p7 so on….the deflation point will be the starting point for comparison with the next point, if we have millions of points how we can automate using python.

‎10-10-2018

I have a line feature with elevation value, I need to extract a point along the line where its slope percentage is out of the range (-0.05 to 0.05), what I tried was I created a number of points by featureverticestopoint with all option, I got a big point data, then I tried to compare slope from one point to the other but I could not come up which point are out of the range, to keep their location, I need a python script, that loop each slope from point to point.

‎09-28-2018

The objective is to create cluster area for rail road based on divID, therefore the boundary of the clustering is created at equal distance from any direction of the rail road, if two or three rail road line are meet at a point, we will have two or three polygons based on the divID . the edge or the boundary is created based on the area between the lines which have different divID.

‎09-28-2018

Is that possible to create a polygon from a line feature? like that of thiessen polygon from point data! I need to have the created polygon edge generated at equal distance from two or more line features, I have tried to make the polygon using modelbuilder by converting the line to point and point to polygon using thiessen polygon tool but the polygons created by the modelbuilder is not what I want, I need to help me someone with python scripts. I need to have the polygon like the red outlined polygon to all classified line feature.

‎09-28-2018

Is that possible to create a polygon from a line feature? like that of thiessen polygon from point data! I need to have the created polygon edge generated at equal distance from two or more line features, I have tried to make the polygon using modelbuilder by converting the line to point and point to polygon using thiessen polygon tool but the polygons created by the modelbuilder is not what I want, I need to help me someone with python scripts. I need to have the polygon like the red outlined polygon to all classified line feature.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎09-05-2023 03:04 PM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by KunomBersh

arcpy Runtime content in ArcGIS 10.7.1

Re: slope analysis

Re: slope analysis

slope analysis

Re: Is that possible to create a polygon from a line feature? like that of thiessen polygon from point data!

Is that possible to create a polygon from a line feature? like that of thiessen polygon from point data!

Is that possible to create a polygon from a line feature? like that of thiessen polygon from point data

Re: Is that possible to create a polygon from a li...

3D Geologie und GIS