POST
|
I am seeing something similar. I have a view layer created from joining a related table to the primary features. I filter the result by date in two separate layers; One for within the last 1 year(s) and one for not within the last 1 year(s). The both display in the web map but only the former appears in the mobile maps either in collector or field maps.
... View more
05-27-2021
06:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
491
|
POST
|
Superb! Have you experienced any detriment to using the synchronous option?
... View more
03-21-2020
02:58 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1244
|
IDEA
|
i need to be able to symbolize pipes with flow direction based on digitized direction
... View more
07-12-2017
03:10 PM
|
15
|
3
|
1036
|
POST
|
Consider if you will polygon A of a standard unchanging dimension. For the sake of argument lets call it a simple rectangle 10' x 20' not any irregular shape with hundreds of vertices but not a square or circle either. How can a user assess which of a group of polygons can completely contain polygon A. This appears like it ought to be a frequently occurring question in assessor's offices and planning departments: How many of my town's parcels have both the amount and orientation of land to support a building of a given size and dimensions. Can city engine do something like this easily?
... View more
01-06-2017
01:03 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1799
|
POST
|
I'm new to 3D representations but I think what I want to do ought to be possible. Here it is: I'm trying to identify the best (any) method to create an extrapolated (interpolated) 3D 'thing'. Not sure if it would rightly be called a surface, multipatch, or extruded shape but here's the detail. I've got boring data for some number of wells across a site. For each well I have the horizontal location and the starting elevation (ground surface). The well data records a value for the amount of a soil contaminant at various irregular intervals along the depth of the well shaft. I have the depth of each recording and can calculate the elevation of each recording. So the tabular data after formatting will look something like the table at the bottom. It should be noted that each well is of varying depth, and the responses are irregular in their depth intervals. Using a Z-enabled FC I can create a matrix of points each with a response value that I then want to use to construct the 'blob' to visualize the extent and distribution of the contaminant based on the response. I want also to be able to afterward take cross sections (horizontal and vertical) of the resultant 'blob'. Does ArcGIS have tools to perform these functions? I've access to Map 10.4, Pro 1.3, 3D analyst and Spatial Analyst extensions. Any insight the community can provide is appreciated. Thanks for reading! Well X Y Z(Ft AMSL) Response(ppm) A 11111111.1 11111111.2 230 0 A 11111111.1 11111111.2 222 25 A 11111111.1 11111111.2 219 40 B 22222222.1 22222222.2 195 100 B 22222222.1 22222222.2 191 60 B 22222222.1 22222222.2 188 50 C 33333333.1 33333333.2 322 25 C 33333333.1 33333333.2 320 5 C 33333333.1 33333333.2 312 0
... View more
08-10-2016
05:49 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2677
|
POST
|
According to Andrew in the geodata team this should be coming in 10.3
... View more
07-17-2014
09:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
602
|
POST
|
Hello GeoNet, I have an enterprise db in MS SQL Express. It is a replica so therefore, versioned which is from everything the help file tells me, in conflict with the ability to synch offline as with the collector app. The workflow I envisioned was that using this replica we would: Publish the feature services to ArcGIS for Server Create a WebMap in AGOL Download the data to a device w/ the collector app (Cell Coverage could be spotty) Deploy to the field and collect updates Return to the office and synch with the versioned replica Then synch with the parent. This does not appear possible because of two conflicting factors; The versioned data and the requirement to synch. I know I can publish the services to AGOL directly and take them off line that way but that creates a disconnected data island that then has no way to return to the replica. Does anyone have any suggestions on altering my proposed workflow? Thanks Dan
... View more
07-15-2014
06:30 AM
|
0
|
1
|
4240
|
POST
|
I've just run into this exactly as you describe. I've verified geometry w/ check geometry on every FC in the check-out. I was curious if you'd learned of a solution?
... View more
09-24-2013
04:58 PM
|
0
|
0
|
689
|
POST
|
We have a similar situation with the following specifics: We are at 10.1 and hold the child DB currently a data receiver. Remote location is on version 10 and has the Parent DB also a data receiver. I've tried re-exporting unacknowledged changes as the thread suggests and when I import it into their db the result is an error that indicates "Generation #'s are out of order" any help is apprecitated
... View more
07-10-2013
11:17 AM
|
0
|
0
|
523
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
15 | 07-12-2017 03:10 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
08-06-2024
07:36 PM
|