Latest Contributions by ZacharySutherby

Hey @MatthewKing,  Try this link: https://earlyadopter.esri.com/key/TNRT%20RFFW%20JBT9%20NVQC Do you see a difference using that link? If so I'll update the links in this post and on the registration survey.  Thank you,  Zach ... View more

Hey @Carrie2025,  Try running your notebook using the latest 2.4.2 version of the ArcGIS API for Python. This was logged as BUG-000179345. It looks like you're running your notebook in a hosted notebook, unfortunately the current runtime version for hosted notebooks uses Python API 2.4.1. At this time to test in 2.4.2 you would need to download the notebook and run in ArcGIS Pro 3.6 or a standalone Python environment.  ... View more

Hey @ChristopherCounsell,  No additional requirements for relationships with other layers/tables not intended for use in Survey123. The thing to keep in mind is Connect has BUG-000120260 - Survey123 Connect for ArcGIS fails to publish a survey from an existing feature service when referencing a secondary related table, returning the error message: “Parent layer id _ not found for related table.” logged that is a consideration when building a schema intended for use as a submission_url in Survey123.  Where this would come into play is say you had a schema of:  Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3  Layer 1 has a 1:M relationship with Layer 3, and Layer 2 has a 1:M relationship with Layer 3.  If you want to author a survey where the form_id is set to Layer 2 and Layer 3 is a repeat in the form design, this situation will run into the defect above as when Connect triages the feature layer it will incorrectly assume it should be using the Layer 1 to Layer 3 relationship causing the error message to display.  ... View more

Hello @ChristopherCounsell,  With 3.22 we fixed BUG-000155440, which introduced an unintended side effect where parent layers for view services are always being checked which is incorrect especially when using a submission_url.  This has been logged as a few different BUGs with a few different workflows, the defects we have noted are:  BUG-000176334 BUG-000176112 BUG-000176015 We have a resolution for this issue in our 3.23 builds of Connect. Would you be able to test your workflow in the beta version of Survey123 Connect 3.23 from EAC, the issue should be resolved in this version.  ... View more

Hey @ChrisAuger,  It would be best to reach out to Esri Technical Support to assist with troubleshooting. What would help troubleshooting would be a diagnostic log when trying to publish the survey. Additionally if you are using ArcGIS Online or ArcGIS Enterprise, and if you're using ArcGIS Enterprise what version?  ... View more

Hey @JFiaccoCOL,  I'm not quite able to find the combination to reproduce the issue on my end, here is a sample XLSForm that I'm using for testing.  ... View more

@JFiaccoCOL,  What browser are you using when you see the behavior?  ... View more

Hey @JFiaccoCOL,  What version of Survey123 Connect are you using? Can you try appending `?version=latest` to the end of your web app URL (ex. https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/<itemID>?version=latest  )?  If using version=latest resolves the issue you can either change the surveys settings to "Always use the latest version", or upgrade your Connect to the latest 3.22 version and republish.  ... View more

Hey @JFiaccoCOL,  Try:  <p><b>Note: This survey is only intended for those who have received the postcard pictured below.</b></p><br><p>Please read the instructions before filling out the survey.</p><br><p>By EPA regulatory mandate, we need to document the materials of your water service line. If you received the postcard below stating your service line material is unknown, submit the survey below to avoid potholing your yard. <b>You must submit a photo of the first 18" of your service line as it enters the building.</b></p>   The web app can be a bit more strict about HTML syntax ... View more

Hello @CarstenAndersson,  Can you clone your arcgispro-py3 environment and upgrade your arcgis package to the latest 2.4.1 version. Are you able to successfully publish in 2.4.1?  ... View more