Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About RosieYacoub
RosieYacoub
Occasional Contributor
since
07-04-2014
09-04-2025
20
Posts created
33
Kudos given
0
Solutions
8
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(0 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by RosieYacoub
|
POST
|
This issue was fixed by setting up the labels differently. However, it has returned. This time I had to reload the polygons with no cartography and a cooperator set up the cartography in their AGOL. Super frustrating.
... View more
05-14-2024
11:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
828
|
|
POST
|
I have a simple map that contains a couple boundaries, a polygon layer that has boundaries colored by an attribute and labeled with an ID and a set of points that will be added to by taking surveys in the colored polygons (which are vegetation survey targets). In ArcGIS online, the survey target polygons draw just fine, and the labels, which are scale dependent do what they are supposed to. However, in ArcGIS Field Maps, some polygons disappear and reappear somewhat randomly (they don't disappear when the labels appear, and they reappear at different zoom levels for different polygons). This really keeps the app from being useful, so wondering how to prevent this. notice the yellow bounded polygon in the south west part of map (PMAA0330) that was missing when zoomed out further.
... View more
09-22-2022
08:26 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1178
|
|
POST
|
We currently have 9 iPad mini 4 that we run ArcGIS Field Maps on. Apple has a tendency to stop supporting iPads around 5 years, according to a couple websites. However, according to this website: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/which-tablets-are-compatible-with-ipados-16/ the next iOS will not be compatible with the mini 4. I am thinking this means it is time to replace all the iPad mini 4s. Anyone want to counter with experience running ESRI apps on devices with old iOS? I am wondering if we could at least use the iPad mini 4s as backups if we don't upgrade our ArcGIS FieldMaps?
... View more
08-01-2022
12:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
749
|
|
IDEA
|
The update query and multilevel joins that can be handled through MS Access far exceed anything ESRI has so far. If ESRI can give ArcGIS pro the same query tools MSAccess does: a UI that permits temporary joins across multiple tables and keys, allows for group by queries on any combination of attributes, allows for dependable query speed under one second for over 50,000 records--then they might be able to let go of the PGDB. Or if they provided an ODBC driver to the file geodatabase....
... View more
01-05-2018
10:31 AM
|
7
|
2
|
4013
|
|
DOC
|
I downloaded the tool, and tried to get it to run from ArcMap. The tool extracted as an empty toolbox, three python scripts, and a pyc file. So I brought the toolbox into ArcToolbox and tried adding the python scripts, naming them as they are named. Then I tried running them, but I never was presented with any parameters to fill with login infomation, service name, etc.. Perhaps I did something wrong, or perhaps it is because I am still running 10.3.1? It looks like AttachmentsToPopup.py is meant to run first.
... View more
10-12-2017
07:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
19034
|
|
POST
|
My workaround for having problems with offline use has been to get out of my work network (taking the laptop home, or going where there is just wi-fi), opening Drone2Map, and setting it up for offline use there. Then, when I am done with using it completely offline, again opening Drone2Map while off my work network but connected to wi-fi, going back to the licensing interface, and unchecking the "Authorize Drone2Map to work offline" box.
... View more
09-26-2017
09:07 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2269
|
|
POST
|
I am processing imagery from Drone2Map and noticed that when I processed two adjacent collections separately (each collection was processed to a separate orthomosaic) it seemed to take dramatically less time than when processing the two collections into a single orthomosaic: the two collections processed separately processed each overnight; whereas the single took two nights PLUS the whole daytime in between. I became curious about that, and started to look for clues in the processing reports. Has anyone experienced this difference and know what it stems from? The processing reports paint a different picture of what happened (although it still showed that in total it was more efficient to process the collections separately). According to the report, the time spent for Initial Processing (without report) of the single process of the two collections was only 10:48 minutes (as opposed to the around 30 hours that I observed Drone2Map working on the process). Does this mean the bulk of the time spent by Drone2Map is in report generation? For me, if it is less efficient to process more photos together than to process them in chunks, that might be important to my workflow, generally. So I am hoping someone has some experience/suggestions.
... View more
09-26-2017
08:54 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2380
|
|
POST
|
I am experimenting with editing JUST THE ATTRIBUTES of a feature class in SDE. I created a view in SQL Management Studio that had only the attribute fields (no shape, no objectid). Then I linked to that in MS Access using ODBC, and edited a few existing records through a form. The form is limited to edits (no additions or deletions available), and I have hidden the table from view. Hoping this might provide a better method for data entry than editing rows in ArcMap.
... View more
04-03-2017
04:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1291
|