Latest Contributions by AmirBar-Maor

This issue is not specific to the parcel fabric. Any line feature with an attribute rule (validation) will fail. The workaround is to remove the attribute rules from the line feature class, if that is possible. If you have someone in your organization that has permission to submit a case please work with them. In fact, any customer that would like to see this fixed is encouraged to submit a case, which help prioritize fixing it. ... View more

@EddieQuinlan1  - yes, we will be in the conference and would love to meet. Please DM me to coordinate + include the organization you work for. Validate can be executed as an interactive tool using the Validate Extent on the Quality ribbon as well as a geoprocessing tool for validating larger extents that might take a long while to process. For regular work I would opt for using the interactive tool:   ... View more

Hi @EddieQuinlan1  ArcInfo 'BUILD' and 'CLEAN'?! not too many people know that... 🙂 The parcel fabric 'Create Seeds' and 'Build' work differently than ArcInfo. In General, the ArcInfo information model was not scalable. Every edits could have many downstream impact and features that needed to get updated. Geodatabase topology does not persist the topological relationships and can scale.  After creating your lines (closed loops) you can press 'Create Seeds' then 'Build'. If there are any miniscule differences visible in absurd scales, you can run Validate from the Quality tab. If we detect that you are validating too many features we will suggest to use the geoprocessing tool instead. I hope this helps. We can also hop on a call, and if you work in San Bernardino County, can even meet with some team members face to face. Welcome to the 21st century 😉       ... View more

@EddieQuinlan1  It is hard to tell if the issue is a display issue or a topology data issue without having a reproducible case. Can you work with technical support to submit a case so they can have a look into it.  Validate involves 'cracking and clustering' - does validating the extent fixes the issue? You screenshot shows a parcel labeled as a 'Seed'  - a seed should have a smaller geometry bounded by a closed loop of lines. Please try to use  'Shrink to Seed' and then 'Reconstruct from seed' ... View more

Implemented with ArcGIS Pro 3.7 for most panes. If there is a specific pane that misbehaves please let us know. ... View more

Implemented with ArcGIS Pro 3.7. If there is no selection a warning is displayed underneath the input parcel fabric parameter.   This is true for launching LSA from the ribbon or from the geoprocessing tools pane. If there is a selection, it is honored (even if it is very large)   ... View more

Implemented with ArcGIS Pro 3.7 ... View more

@LeoDCG  The issue of using a 'scratch' or 'construction' layer outside of the parcel fabric are: You cannot use many tool, including COGO Reader Features you create are not associate to the record. You cannot use 'Show only Active' for example Inefficient - it introduces more steps, as you have to copy or append the features to the target layer Schema - as schema might be different, some of the attribution, such as COGO might be lost  BUT... If you insist of using a different layer you can always add a parcel type called 'scratch' or 'construction' and COGO Reader will be able to write to those. You can make the layer look exactly as it looks now, so no major change from the user perspective. Would that work for you? If not please explain why not. ... View more

@KevinPiraino2  Yes - this made it into ArcGIS Enterprise 12.0 You can learn more about it in this video: However, please take into account the version 12.0 will not have Extended Support so you might want to wait for version 12.1 that is planned to be released in a few months (~June 2026).   ... View more

@CharlotteAndrews Did you intend to submit this idea on the Parcel Fabric ideas board? Should we move it to the Pro ideas board? ... View more

Duplicate of https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-ideas/human-readable-created-by-record-retired-by-record/idi-p/1149554/jump-to/first-unread-message   ... View more

Implemented with ArcGIS Pro 3.7 ... View more