| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 ESRI:   Please weigh-in here... why does Date Only display correctly on the S123 website, but incorrectly on the feature report?      S123 Connect 3.24.30 XLS Form            Feature service (Enterprise 11.5)      Feat. service attribute table in Pro 3.5.3         Sample individual report template (Generated by S123 website)         Resulting feature report PDF shows 10/22/2025 and NOT 10/23/2025 like it should.          The fix! Just add utcOffset to the feature report, like so:         The resulting PDF now prints 10/23/2025 like it should.                         This is throwing a major wrench in the engine. 
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
			Friday
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                1
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                3
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 unfortunately, that doesn't work. It then thinks both #noncompliance and #noncompliance_photos are unclosed. 
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
			Tuesday
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                92
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 I have this at the top, so that the entire section can be skipped if no photos exist.  ${#noncompliance}${if (noncompliance_photos | getValue:"count")>0}     But I guess, that starts the noncompliance_photos parser? 
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
			Tuesday
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                112
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 I have a nested repeat of noncompliance and noncompliance_photos.  ${#noncompliance}  $#{noncompliance_photos}  ${/}  ${/}     In a feature report template, how do I use the $feature keywork to get the position of each record?   ${#noncompliance}${if (noncompliance_photos | getValue:"count")>0}  Non-compliance Number: ${$feature | getValue: "position"}  Photo Number: ${$feature | getValue: "position"}  ${/}${/}     The above only gets the position of the inner-most repeat, not the parent repeat.   Any help with this?  
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
			Tuesday
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                6
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                141
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 Same experience here with dateOnly field. It shows 10/21/2025 in the feature service (Survey123 website data tab), but when printed to a feature report ${monitoring_date | format:"MM/DD/YYYY"} it will be 10/20/2025.   default calculation is today() in Survey123 connect. I recently changed that to now(), maybe that will make a difference?      Did you ever get this solved?    
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
			2 weeks ago
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                35
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 I'm filtering a repeat in a report template like so, works great.   ${#issues | where:"issue_resolved='Yes'"}   ${rpt_issue_info_resolved}   ${/}     Is there a way to add a condition to that filtered repeat, that depends on the count of the filtered records?  Something like this:  ${if (issues | where:"issue_resolved='No'" | getValue: "count") > 0}  ${#issues}   ${rpt_issue_info_unresolved}   ${/}${/}     I keep getting invalid expression...  thanks! 
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
			3 weeks ago
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                1
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                99
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 The AttachmentsCreated feature service webhook fires reliably, but I discovered Editor Tracking on the SDE geodatabase attachment table has to be enabled in order for the attachments:{adds:[]} JSON object returned from /extractChanges to be populated with the attachment info.      But ONLY in an online workflow. If the field maps app is used offline, then the feature (with attachment) is synced, the webhook fires, but attachments:{adds:[]} is empty.   Anyone else experience this? We're using ArcGIS Enterprise 11.4 
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		03-22-2025
	
		
		07:25 AM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                271
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 Why can't I retrieve any attachments when using an attribute rule, Insert trigger on a layer that has attachments enabled?   This is an Enterprise Geodatabase that's published to Enterprise 11.4 as a referenced feature service.  Both methods below fail to retrieve the attachment on the photo_point layer.  Count(Attachments($feature))
//always reports 0
var sql = Concatenate(["(rel_globalid = '",$feature.globalid,"')"]);
var photoTableFeatSet = Filter(FeatureSetByName($datastore,'dbname.dbo.photo_point__ATTACH',['rel_globalid','att_name'],false),sql);
Count(photoTableFeatSet)
//always reports 0        I even setup a feature service webhook on photo_point layer, listening for 'AttachmentsCreated', which successfully fires a powerAutomate flow.   But, inside the flow, calling /extractChanges, with the below query params  {
  "token": "validToken",
  "dataFormat": "json",
  "layers": "[5]",
  "returnAttachments": "true",
  "returnAttachmentsDataByUrl": "true",
  "f": "json",
  "serverGens": "1742307850054,1742307850055"
}     then the returned change "attachments" value always is this:  "attachments": {
                    "adds": [],
                    "updates": [],
                    "deleteIds": []
                }     what is happening?   All I want to do is retrieve attachments on a feature that is inserted into a layer. Either by attribute rule or feature service webhook, I don't care!  
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		03-18-2025
	
		
		11:06 AM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                1
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                322
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 My only advice is to migrate both FsLogix profile containers AND GIS file share to Azure NetApp files and stop fussing with Azure Files (all storage/transaction tiers).   We have 1 Azure NetApp 3TB capacity pool (premium tier) that's used for /profile and /gis shares and have had zero issues since my above thread reply. We opted for manual throughput, so that we could favor the /gis volume and assign it 132 MiB/Sec. The profiles are a bit slow to sign-out due to the throughput bottleneck, but we just advised users to sign-out of AVD, then minimize the AVD session and go about their business on the local PC. FsLogix eventually completes all communication with the profile container in netapp and signs-out w/out any issues.  We started using this CPU SKU: Standard NC16as T4 v3, and we're able to comfortably fit 4 pooled (multi-session) users on the same VM. I actually think we could increase that to 5, maybe 6... and all of them are using Pro. It's pretty amazing.           
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		02-18-2025
	
		
		11:55 AM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                1
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                2750
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 Thanks David. Yes, Count(FeatureSetByName) returns a different number depending on replica sync, vs. inserting a feature using Pro.   VERY confusing and not documented at all (at least from what I could find).   This arcade script is already bloated at 500 lines. Could be trimmed down if I take some more time, but complex. I really see no other alternative to firing a script by insert trigger. Maybe a feature service webhook would be more reliable. Better yet, that webhook calls powerAutomate flow, that invokes an Azure python runbook... 
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		10-24-2024
	
		
		12:29 PM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                442
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 We have a fairly complex Arcade script that executes on Enterprise Geodatabase feature class Insert via a sync from an offline area in the field maps app.   If we query the feature class using Filter(FeatureSetByName()), the returned feat_set does not contain $feature that triggered the attribute rule.      var calcFeatId = -99;
var sqlexpression = "feat_id = @calcFeatId"
var feat_set = Filter(FeatureSetByName($datastore,'mydb.dbo.pt_layer',['globalid'],false),sqlexpression);
return {
            'attributes':{ //values to calculate on $feature
                'feat_id': calcFeatId
            }
        };        Is this expected behavior?   Further, what if that same attribute rule modifies attribute values of $feature. Would the above query include $feature in the filtered featureSet?  
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		10-24-2024
	
		
		11:18 AM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                2
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                478
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 We've had the same postgresql (15.6) database and feature service published for a few years, its been working great and is heavily utilized by staff using the Field Maps app (both iOS and Android).   After upgrading to 11.3 we're getting failed sync's and consistent error logs in server manager.       Field-collected edits are successfully synced to the SDE geodatabase, but the users are unable to sync in the download direction (from SDE geodatabase to Field maps device). A lot of edits/manipulation is done when the upload sync happens via attribute rules, and the field staff are UNABLE to then sync these edits to their devices, causing field-chaos.  I have a case open with tech. support, just seeing if any other users are experiencing this behavior at 11.3    
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		07-26-2024
	
		
		07:15 AM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                1
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                578
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 We use a Microsoft PowerAutomate Cloud Flow as our webhook receiver. After updating to Enterprise 11.3, we're trying to use signature verification to authenticate the webhook trigger.   However, since our Microsoft services are deployed in US Goverment (GCC High), we're unable to use the Encodian - Connectors | Microsoft Learn and Utlity - Create HMAC.  I'm wondering how others are generating these HMACs, using the secret key specified in the Server webhook? Or, any pointers on how to do this in Power Automate Cloud flows without using Encodian?  
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		07-10-2024
	
		
		07:48 AM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                0
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                755
             
         | 
    
| 
             
                POST		  
                
             
         | 
        
        
 
					
							 Fortunately, this was just cached browser data causing the issue! I initially cleared Edge cache from "Last 7 days" selected, but I tried "All Time" when clearing it this time, and it's working great now!   Phew... didn't want to deal with this on a Fri evening. 
						
					
					... View more
				 
			
			
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
			
    
	
		
		
		06-21-2024
	
		
		03:34 PM
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		          | 
        
             
                
                2
             
         | 
        
             
                
                1
             
         | 
        
             
                
                    
                
                1990
             
         | 
    
| Title | Kudos | Posted | 
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friday | |
| 1 | 02-06-2019 06:41 AM | |
| 1 | 02-18-2025 11:55 AM | |
| 1 | 05-14-2024 10:29 AM | |
| 2 | 06-21-2024 03:34 PM | 
| Online Status | 
					
			 
	
			
					Offline
				
		
 
		
				 | 
			
| Date Last Visited | 
					
			 
				
    
	
		
		
			Friday
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
			 
		
				 |