POST
|
@samlhwonguk, Did you ever figure this out? We are having the same issue with a branch-versioned feature service.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
56
|
POST
|
Can Workflow Manager prevent new projects from being created in an area covered by a currently active project? In a related question, is it possible to ensure that only features in the active project area are edited? I would like to prevent edits to features outside of specific project areas.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
67
|
POST
|
We have a notebook in ArcGIS online that runs some geoprocessing tools on a .csv file and publishes the results to a hosted feature layer. The .csv file is currently manually uploaded each week. Is there any way to automate this upload? The problem is that we don't have a local server to act as an intermediate host of the file. We need to add the .csv to our AGOL content directly from Notebook.
... View more
09-12-2024
02:24 PM
|
0
|
2
|
209
|
POST
|
I just encountered this error on 3 apps running 4.14. 2 of them I upgraded to 4.20 and they are working now. 1 of them is using IdentifyTask class which is removed at 4.20. I downgraded to 4.11 as a quick and dirty fix and now this app is also working, at least so far. @JonathanWilding I'll update this thread if my users encounter the bug on the 4.11 app.
... View more
08-27-2024
02:21 PM
|
0
|
1
|
818
|
IDEA
|
Currently, editors with an Admin user role or Version Admin role in Portal can edit the Default version directly in ArcGIS Pro even when it is Protected. I, and many users I have worked with over the years, find it too easy to accidentally start editing Default instead of first switching to a version. This is potentially very dangerous since there is no Undo editing Default using branch versioning. Adding the ability to lock the Default version from direct edits would prevent this. Only Rec and Post operations will be allowed to update the default version. This would help enforce data integrity workflows and tools, such as the use of the Version difference tool.
... View more
07-03-2024
10:12 AM
|
5
|
0
|
273
|
POST
|
Thanks, Marlon. I was wondering if Esri has a preferred approach, as both are equal from a client's point of view.
... View more
07-02-2024
03:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
474
|
POST
|
Does Esri have a preferred method of editing data? I've noticed that most of the new functionality coming out focuses on service-based editing, parcel fabric, Utility network, etc. Is traditional versioning still a fully valid approach to editing? I have a new project that can go either way: Traditional or Branch versioning. Traditional with direct database connections is going to be easier to set up and integrate with existing workflows, but it's not a deal breaker. Which approach does Esri recommend?
... View more
07-02-2024
03:33 PM
|
0
|
5
|
498
|
POST
|
Unfortunately, in this case, the module would have to already be present on the workstation. I'm trying to prevent editing from a machine where the module isn't present. For example, if an editor moved cube, and started using ArcGIS Pro from a workstation that doesn't have the module installed.
... View more
07-02-2024
10:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
262
|
POST
|
Thanks for the suggestion, Charles, but I don't think that will work. To access that part of the SDK, the addin would already have to be loaded. I'm looking for a way for the map or layers to check if the addin is loaded when they are added to the map.
... View more
07-01-2024
07:53 PM
|
0
|
0
|
318
|
POST
|
I'm looking for a way to prevent edits to a geodatabase if an addin is not present in ArcGIS Pro. The extension listens to row change events on certain feature classes, and I would like to prevent edits if these row events are not triggered. In ArcObjects and ArcMap I was able to achieve this by using class extensions. Once an extension was registered with a feature class at the geodatabase level, the ArcMap client knew not to allow edit sessions if the class extension was not installed on that workstation. Is there a way to achieve a similar result using the Pro SDK? Unfortunately, the business logic I have to implement is too complex for attribute rules. I am considering SOIs but the preferred workflow is direct database editing.
... View more
07-01-2024
04:10 PM
|
0
|
4
|
369
|
POST
|
Thanks Marlon. Setting the user to sysadmin worked. I'll work on convicing the client to chage to an sde schemad geodatabase to avoid this type of issue in the future.
... View more
06-19-2024
09:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
689
|
POST
|
I had the DBA create an SDE account, added it to db_owner but still got the error. @MarlonAmayaThanks for the suggestion. I'll ask the DBA to temporarily promote an account to sysadmin and see if that works.
... View more
06-14-2024
11:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
757
|
POST
|
@MarceloMarquesThanks for the warning Marcelo. I'll refrain from any SQL edits to the system tables. Fortunately the data is in a separate schema.
... View more
06-13-2024
11:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
831
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 04-10-2024 04:38 PM | |
5 | 07-03-2024 10:12 AM | |
1 | 04-01-2024 04:48 PM | |
1 | 02-14-2024 11:51 AM | |
1 | 02-01-2024 01:02 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
3 weeks ago
|