Latest Contributions by EdwardBlair

Yep. Thx. That seemed to have resolved it. Not sure why Pro would assume a Min value of 1 if the configured Min and Max values were null, but it appears to. Anyway, I'll make sure relationships have valid Min and Max values assigned - and that will be my path forward. Much appreciated. Ed

Hi - I'm creating valves in a UPDM UN database and get the following error about there being no related valve inspection records present. (Valve inspection info is kept in another system and will not be included in the UN database). But when I try to change the relationship multiplicity (below) it looks like no Min and Max values are set. Any clue on what I am missing would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed

Perfect! Makes sense and works as advertised. Thanks, Mike!

Sorry to ask another newbie question, but I'm stuck on this. I added new asset group/asset types to the PipelineDevice class. I was then able to add the new group/types to the Cathodic Protection tier definition. This was great. Then I went to add the asset group/types to the Isolation tier definition. However, this time the new asset group/types were not available to add (below). Any clues on what I'm missing here would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed

Hi J - Thanks for the comment. I'm not sure that using Test Points as subnetwork controllers will actually be a problem for us. We have them connected to test lead wires and service pipes in our network. And initial testing in at least one CP zone shows expected results. I only asked because, as you mentioned, test points don't 'control' anything as do other subnetwork controllers and wanted to make sure I understood the model correctly. Ed

Hi Robert - Thanks for the detail here. This is a pretty interesting perspective. We would not be defining the subnetwork based on the commodity (in this case, electrons) source or sink, but rather based on our measurement of that commodity at locations along the subnetwork. Kind of like considering line monitors as subnetwork controllers for an electric distribution system. I suppose if a gas company implementing this model has a different view, they could define rectifiers/anodes as sources, true? Thanks again, Ed

Hi - Unless I'm misinterpreting things, it looks like the only devices defined as subnetwork controllers for CP subnetworks in the UPDM are test points. I would have thought anodes and/or rectifiers would be considered subnetwork controllers as well. Am I missing something? (As is often the case) Thx, Ed

Got it. My problem was that I had not selected a target layer. It would be really nice if the Template Properties form could be re-sized, but otherwise this seems to work pretty well. Thanks for the tip! Ed

Hmmm... the pre-set template thing seems to be what I'm looking for. However, when I try to use it I get a message that it's unavailable unless I have features selected... even though I *have* features selected.

No, but I will! Thanks for the pointer. Ed

I've been looking but can't find this so thought I would ask. Is there anything equivalent to ArcFM Composite Favorites in ArcGIS Pro, or do we need ArcFM XI for this? (A "composite favorite" is a collection of features placed together in single edit operation. A typical example is a switch cabinet with multiple bus bars, switches, fuses and a cabinet surface structure feature.) Thx, Ed

Will do. Thx

I was hopeful that was it, but the map and all layers have the same projection...

Interesting. Will make sure the projections are the same and try again.

We're seeing inconsistent behavior for snapping with connectivity rules. For example, we have rule that says a "Connector/Overhead Primary Connector" line can connect to an "Overhead Connection Point" junction, however we do not get a snapping "tip" when adding a line when hovering over the connection point.... ... when working with layers published through a feature service. (And, yes, snapping is enabled and works for other connectivity combinations.) However, snapping *is* enabled in the same scenario for data in the source file geodatabase. I must be missing something. Any clues would be much appreciated. Thx, Ed

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Tuesday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by EdwardBlair

Re: UPDM Relationship Min and Max values

UPDM Relationship Min and Max values

Re: Add new asset group/asset type to subnetwork defintion

Add new asset group/asset type to subnetwork defintion

Re: Gas CP Subnetwork Controllers

Re: Gas CP Subnetwork Controllers

Gas CP Subnetwork Controllers

Re: ArcFM Composite Favorite Equivalents in ArcGIS Pro?

Re: ArcFM Composite Favorite Equivalents in ArcGIS Pro?

Re: ArcFM Composite Favorite Equivalents in ArcGIS Pro?

ArcFM Composite Favorite Equivalents in ArcGIS Pro?

Re: Snapping not enabled even though connectivity rule is present

Re: Snapping not enabled even though connectivity rule is present

Re: Snapping not enabled even though connectivity rule is present

Snapping not enabled even though connectivity rule is present

Re: Gas CP Subnetwork Controllers

Re: Gas CP Subnetwork Controllers

Re: UPDM Gas Valve "Current Position" field

Electric Utility Network Subtransmission and Subst...

Re: Coincidence between utility domain and structu...