POST
|
Hi @abureaux Thank you for advising Premium does not resolve the issue. I have tried your suggestion thanks, but unfortunately this seems to prevent ObjectID or other fields being listed for the Report action. So I was stumped! A colleague has apparently come up with a fix this morning. I might post this here if anyone is interested. Thanks!
... View more
05-15-2025
04:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
539
|
POST
|
Hi @RickeyFight I am having exactly the same issue. May I ask - how did you solve it?!! My S123 surveys sound very similar to yours - I have 6x surveys all with yes/no questions. A 'no' response then requires a text input and photos. I cannot remove questions - the client needs them all. Using MS Power Automate, it would appear I have to include the submitted record, in order to be able to specify a specific ID or WHERE clause to generate S123 Reports (which are then intended to be emailed via PA).
... View more
05-14-2025
09:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
566
|
POST
|
Hi @abureaux I have the same problem, with some S123 surveys generating about 100-200 fields. Would you know if signing up for MS Power Automate Premium solve the issue? I can't remove questions in the Forms; each yes/no question is required and needs the ability to provide comments and photos. Also do not know what '1024 properties' actually refers to. Anyone else have the same issue and has solved it, it would be really appreciated for any input thanks!
... View more
05-14-2025
09:30 PM
|
0
|
2
|
566
|
POST
|
Thanks @ZacharySutherby And many thanks @KerryKang for posting your question. This fixed our issue! I was thinking the problem was with the UserType/Role and was considering purchasing a Creator UT. I @KerryKang - would you need to change the Role, say to DataEditor? Ensure you have all the feature layers shared? (...but I expect you already have). Many thanks
... View more
01-28-2025
11:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
361
|
POST
|
Hi All, What are the AGOL UserType / Member Roles / privileges that enable the Pulldata function? I have an S123 Connect Form deployed on the iPhone app. This retrieves data from previous Form submissions using the Pulldata function. It appears the AGOL User Type 'MobileWorker' with 'DataEditor' Role does not allow Pulldata to work - this is a bit disappointing. Does this mean I need to purchase a Creator UT and choose perhaps the Publisher Role? If anyone can point me in the direction of some documentation on this it would be much appreciated, thanks! Andy
... View more
01-28-2025
10:46 PM
|
0
|
1
|
275
|
IDEA
|
Hi Laura, This seems to be a common frustration; I have 1,000 points of field data that require consolidation within a report. There is the option to add a Map Frame - but why is there no ability to highlight (or otherwise symbolise) the index feature? The map frame simply pans to centre the map on the index feature - leaving the report user to guess which point is being reported on. Yes, the scale can be increased to zoom in to the map, but this is no good as it loses context when covering a large area. This omission does render the ArcPro report generation rather useless as you might as well have a dry listing. The options are, as far as I'm aware: Use Map Series instead (similar to data driven pages in ArcMap desktop) Use Survey 123 reporting instead Or a funny one - stick with the ArcPro report, and add your map frame in the details section of the report. Then - create a point at the centre of the map frame that sits over the top of the map. This will have the same effect as highlighting the index feature. To the user of your PDF report, it will appear as if the index feature is being highlighted, when all you're doing is putting a blob in the centroid of the map frame!
... View more
07-31-2024
06:56 PM
|
0
|
0
|
559
|
POST
|
SCaldwell, I'm also trying unsuccessfully to do the same. I am wondering if it's the TSC7's inability to use tiled service or an unspecified WMS layer. Or my URL is incorrect.
... View more
02-15-2024
07:42 PM
|
0
|
0
|
684
|
IDEA
|
I agree, I'd like to see the account creation, or duration of the account. I have some users that have 'Never' been logged in. I cannot tell easily if they were created today, by another admin or 12 months ago and lie unused. This means I cannot effectively delete unused (i.e. wasted) accounts without some digging - which wastes time and effort.
... View more
01-28-2024
10:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1331
|
POST
|
Agreed - Esri should allow the popup order to be defined. I'd be happier explaining to users that the popup is 'slow' or 'slower' (whatever the actual delay is) due to underlying data being searched in order to return the correct popup, than to irritate with an unwanted popup that cannot even be moved out the way - AND which has the arrow to the next feature move due to the differences between popup content. It's like a mean game where the user is plagued with unwanted popups that are fiddly to use! Simply ridiculous that an organisation such as Esri cannot see how poor the popups are.
... View more
02-09-2020
10:35 PM
|
6
|
0
|
4832
|
IDEA
|
Grant, Yes, completely agree. I was expecting to find a 'log out widget' to add in my webapps. This is 3 years after your idea post - as far as I can see there is nothing yet. Thanks
... View more
11-11-2019
08:40 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1852
|
IDEA
|
Grant, Yes, completely agree. I was expecting to find a 'log out widget' to add in my webapps. This is 3 years after your idea post - as far as I can see there is nothing yet. Thanks
... View more
11-11-2019
08:40 PM
|
1
|
0
|
683
|
POST
|
Hi Sorry - I haven't seen an answer to the above - is there a way to export a KML/KMZ from features in a WebApp? I am seeking a way for non-GIS users to simply export to KML/KMZ. I have seen the Select Widget, but this is GeoJSON only (not sure what to do with this, how useful this is). Users need to be able to export their features drawn by the Draw widget, not just the existing hosted feature layers in the WebApp. Thank you Andy
... View more
09-06-2018
06:33 PM
|
1
|
1
|
4714
|
POST
|
Adding attachments to a FGDB in ArcMap for use in AGOL: Is it me, or is this unnecessarily confused, awkward and complicated?! I am endeavouring to add 1000s of jpgs & PDFs to various points and polygons in ArcMap, but it appears the tools used for this sort of help, but in the end, one has to create fields and babysit the process all the way. Please jump in if I am doing something wrong here: Create an FGDB, import shp data that will have attachments associated to various Feature Datasets Enable attachments for the above feature class. Oddly, if you have not done this, you can proceed through at least part of the attachment process before it fails and tells you attachments cannot be applied, meaning you need to start again. Enabling should be automatic??!! Generate Attachments Match Table. This is a flawed tool: It searches for files in your specified folder that both wholly match AND begin with the Key Field value. For example, Key Field value "Photo-100" will 'match' files called "Photo-100.jpg", "Photo-100A.jpg", "Photo-100B.jpg", "Photo-100C.jpg", "Photo-100A.PDF" etc. The result is more matches than you have files to attach! In the above case, you need to manually create your own match table with the proper field names (MATCHID & FILENAME, may not be case sensitive) and populate with the values in order for it to attach the correct files at the end of the process. The Match Table(s) cannot reside in the Feature Dataset 'folder' in your FGDB, but you can 'force' them to at least reside in the FGDB itself, in a bid to keep things organised. Otherwise they simply go to your default location for losing. I have noticed that if you specify the Match Table location to be within your FGDB, it creates an OBJECTID field. Add Attachments. The tool's Input Dataset field is badly worded, beginning by stating the GDB/FC you're adding attachments to, only to contradict this by saying they are not directly added. A suggestion: "Geodatabase table or feature class, to which your attachments will be associated via a related attachment table that maintains linkage to the input dataset." Match Join Field: should I use the FILENAME field or MATCHID here? Not sure if this is a safe option as what guarantee is there that the correct record will go with the Input Join field? It appears that FILENAME can only be used in the Match Table if the full filename (including filename extension) is present in an Input Dataset field. Match Path Field: why is this not already 'taken care of' by the Match Table, seeing the folder was browsed as part of that process...? (though I can see the table could be used for multiple folder locations - hence the relative path option? The Match Path Field is not even present in the Match Table. It seems it can only be used in conjunction with the 'optional' Working Folder - so it's hardly optional.... The resultant ATTACH table is created in the 'root' of the FGDB, again not in the Feature Dataset folder - a shame. Having written this process, it seems the key is understanding the Match Table - this is all important to successfully attaching data, to the right Feature Dataset record. It seems the Feature Dataset benefits from having a field specifying the attachment filename as it simplfies the subsequent Match Table and Add Attachments function. Happy for feedback! Thanks for reading
... View more
09-03-2018
07:20 PM
|
0
|
0
|
758
|
IDEA
|
Hi Bill, I think any user, regardless of role, is prevented from deleting accidentally i.e. everyone is subject to the delete protection in the same way.
... View more
07-29-2018
08:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2294
|
IDEA
|
Hi, some simple icon additions in the AGOL My Contents listing would speed up map and data administration. Essentially these would save the clumsy, laborious process of viewing Item Details to check unnecessarily: e.g. Icons for: Delete Protection; Online/Offline: Retrieve Features vs. attachments; Layer Settings / HTTPS; I expect this could cause some clarity issues, but even this could be overcome by hide/show of these Item attributes in My Contents. The next step would to be able to edit these settings for multiple Items at once. Thank you.
... View more
07-01-2018
04:46 AM
|
2
|
0
|
586
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 09-06-2018 06:33 PM | |
6 | 02-09-2020 10:35 PM | |
1 | 11-11-2019 08:40 PM | |
1 | 11-11-2019 08:40 PM | |
4 | 07-01-2018 04:36 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
06-03-2025
07:54 PM
|