Latest Contributions by ShaunWalbridge

With Pro 3.7, the supported CUDA version is 12.9 which provides compute capability support for 9.0, 10.0 and 12.0 cards covering both Hopper and Blackwell generation GPUs. The software been tested and validated on Blackwell machines, note that you'll need to ensure sufficiently updated drivers (551.61+) to support the newer release of CUDA. ... View more

Thanks for your suggestion, we appreciate your feedback. GDAL is an integral part of our system, and we're aggressively upgrading it at each Pro release, see the released versions in this PDF: https://github.com/Esri/arcpy/blob/main/docs/ArcGIS-Pro-Python-Distribution-By-Release.pdf Pro 3.6 includes GDAL 3.11, and the upcoming Pro 3.7 release will include the latest GDAL 3.12. By remaining on an aggressive upgrade schedule, you should be getting a recent GDAL by default when you update the software. Also, starting with Pro 3.6, all the command line tools for GDAL including `gdal.exe` for a unified CLI are shipped out of the box. However, if you do need a different version of GDAL than the one we provide, creating a custom environment with the required version of GDAL is the right way to go: Because GDAL is a part of our system, its version can't be changed in the same environment that is driving ArcGIS Pro without potentially causing other issues. If you did need a different version, you can do so and still call it with e.g. subprocess calls to talk to it from a Pro based environment. Cheers, Shaun ... View more

Thanks for the suggestion, and sorry we broke some of your code. We did remove toml / tomli as you mentioned because of tomlib being in the standard library, but missed that it drops write support. toml-w is now up on the Esri channel, and we'll work on adding it to the next release of the software. Cheers, Shaun ... View more

As an update to this, for the last year we've been providing a PDF of the packages in our Python distribution on the ArcPy GitHub site at https://github.com/esri/arcpy/ There's also a JSON version if you need to work with this data programmatically. Those two files get updated with each release. Cheers, Shaun ... View more

I'm working with some folks internally to identify which bug this correctly maps to, but wanted to let you know that the bug you've identified (BUG-000115963) is not related to the report provided within this post. That bug is specific to random raster ramps, which is not the case in a hypsometric tint ramp like the one listed here. We will respond with more information once it is gathered. For future reference, please refrain from at messaging a collection of people: choose the one or two people who are most appropriate (here, I would've picked Esri employees already involved in the issue), and wait for a response before trying to engage more individuals. This helps prevent duplicate efforts from our teams in triaging communications, and ultimately will make us more likely to address your concerns. Cheers, Shaun ... View more

I would appreciate a bug being logged on this, or sufficient detail for us to reproduce it in house. While the products and their registry keys should not interact, Python environments are a fairly special case. Why? Because once you create custom environments, they can be located anywhere on disk, and potentially map back to either Pro or Server or one of the other four products that also produce custom environments. In that case, mixing between environment types installed with different products can be problematic, because the versions won't align between those cases, and I suspect there is some interaction in that area at play here. ... View more

Thanks for the suggestion. Could you clarify what kinds of servers you need to access in this way? If they are ArcGIS Servers, the Python API today has a PKCS12 story that should work (it was added a few releases ago): https://developers.arcgis.com/python/latest/guide/working-with-different-authentication-schemes/#web-tier-authentication-secured-with-pki The package itself is really just one file (https://github.com/m-click/requests_pkcs12/blob/master/requests_pkcs12.py), which is about 150 lines if you strip off the tests. It might be easiest just to inline that if you do need direct access to a PKCS12 server outside of an ArcGIS server context, but am interested to hear if there are more nuances that aren't captured yet. Thanks, Shaun     ... View more

I realize I'm replying to a very old thread, but for the past year we've been packaging and hosting geopandas directly on the Esri channel, ensuring there is a version which is binary compatible with the rest of Pro. ... View more

@KevinGabelmanby coincidence, today is the day we flipped over the Pro 3.5 packages onto the main Esri channel. You should be able to upgrade to it, e.g. from the command line, with `conda upgrade --no-pin python`. ... View more

Hi @DarrenConly, just wanted to mention that with Pro 3.4+, we now include the `libmamba` solver with a much more modern Conda version (24.7.1) which is better at solves. You can now install polars from conda-forge with `conda install conda-forge::polars` and it should work. If it'd be useful to you, we could also build and host this on our channel, please make a request and I'd be happy to get that in our queue. ... View more

@AJRI see them all under the linked to https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/arcpy/functions/table-properties.htm, I believe that's where they are within the object hierarchy. ... View more

Seems like a reasonable request, we'll look into it. ... View more

@AlfredBaldenweckOK. I think in that case, you can do it with validation code to modify the state to only support a single checked value and uncheck the other values when one of the values has been altered.   After some internal polling,  we think that we've been able to produce a wide variety of Geoprocessing tools with different interfaces without an explicit radio option, and without this mapping onto a broader need it isn't something we currently intend to offer. I'll leave this open for now to see if it attracts attention more broadly, but workarounds are the best short term bet in any case. ... View more

@AlfredBaldenweckThanks for your suggestion. Could you see if the existing Multivalue controls described in the parameter controls documentation allow you to do what you're looking for? Those seem to map most closely and would allow you to avoid the dropdown. ... View more

@dbKlingdom Please log an issue with support for your issue—I looked through the codepaths that I see related to the upgrade and don't see anything that would trigger a rename to happen, but support should be able to suss out what differs between our setups. ... View more