Latest Contributions by HamishMills2

Thank you Asrujit SenGupta   and Derek Law   both your comments were extremely helpful and gave me the answer I needed. Fingers crossed that this functionality isn't too far away!  ... View more

Hi Xander, This workflow does not work for me. Are you entering the related myID field manually or is pro automatically populating this for you? I can see how, if you manually populate the related field you could simply open the table and add related records freely. For my clients I require a more logical workflow however. i.e. so that you populate the related records directly off of the feature and you do not have to populate the related field.  In any case don't spend too much time on this, it is purely an experimental/learning exercise at this point, and I agree that in the interim I can always get users to use a webapp.  Cheers.  ... View more

Licensing is not the limitation, currently using Advanced.  ... View more

Thanks Xander, I'm familiar with Collector workflows for in the field, however for an office environment we are wanting to do this in ArcGIS Pro only.  ... View more

Hi Dan, I'm referring to basic user editing. i.e. I want to add a related record in a table already related to an existing point feature class in ArcGIS Pro. For example a company may have a technician visit a point once a month and every month that tech adds a related record as another visit done. Hope this makes sense.  Cheers ... View more

Fantastic post! Thanks! ... View more

Hey Jason, as far as we have seen the only work around is to switch to a versioning workflow. However if you implement versioning you also then need to manage the offline version that is created per user or map.  With this bug we have generally seen that although collector syncs fail consistently, any data going from mobile device back to main database works. The problem seems to be that any changes going back to your device from the database do not complete. i.e. the posting of changes back to base works but the reconcile back down does not. So as with some of our clients they have chosen to simply tell users to ignore the error for now and if they need changes from the default database, delete the map and re-download it. Hope this is of some help to you.  Cheers Hamish ... View more

Hi Kory, I think you have more or less answered my question here. Although I don't necessarily feel the need for a full wizard, I did want clarification on what feature creation workflows were currently available in pro and it seems that the 'create' then 'design' is the only/preferred workflow at this time. Thanks! ... View more

Simply to be able to assign the fields as you create the feature rather than after the fact, however I agree that this isn't a major. Only wanted to be sure I wasn't missing anything else i.e. another available workflow or as Kory has mentioned below a tool/wizard. Once again, while I don't find it a major issue I do feel that creating fields after you create the feature class feels a bit counter-intuitive, although this could just be all the years of using the desktop wizard....  ... View more

Hi Josh, I think this is now a known bug with 10.5.1, we found the same issue (https://community.esri.com/thread/200887-sync-fails-at-1051-with-500-error ). Cheers ... View more