POST
|
@waterschapVallei_en_Veluwe I updated the link to generate SDEINTERCEPT log files on a machine running ArcGIS Pro. Perhaps you can compare the log files from Pro versions and determine the process that is slowing it down. Behavior on simple features should not change between Pro versions. Are you using any special/advanced layers like utility network, parcel fabric?
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
181
|
POST
|
@waterschapVallei_en_Veluwe Correlating the 'hang' with 'CSharedQueue Stall timeout' - this seems to be a network communication issue in your ArcGIS environment. There could be a variety of factors causing this network communication like, bandwidth between Pro machine and Enterprise Geodatabase server. Recommend testing the same from a Pro machine on close network proximity to Geodatabase server and getting a system admin to monitor the behavior. If needed you can ask the system admin to setup SDE intercept logging : Set up intercept log files on a machine running ArcGIS Pro
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
2
|
213
|
POST
|
@AmyRoust Utility Network dataset is supported. Give it a try following the pre-requisites posted in links above. Please share back your experience.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
1
|
189
|
POST
|
There was a similar BUG-000160398 that was resolved at Pro 3.2. Possible this is remnant of that or new issue.
... View more
08-21-2025
11:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
262
|
POST
|
@Kevin_Andras What is your coordinate reference system and default linear units? In map views, ArcGIS Pro sets the elevation units to the linear units defined by the map's vertical coordinate system, if it exists. If a vertical coordinate system is not assigned, it is set to the linear units defined by the map's x,y coordinate system. REF: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/editing/edit-vertex-z-values.htm
... View more
08-20-2025
05:33 PM
|
0
|
1
|
452
|
POST
|
@VenkataKondepati Enterprise geodatabases are supported in the following relational database management systems: IBM Db2 Microsoft SQL Server Oracle PostgreSQL SAP HANA While there is no documentation of supporting Apache Sedona, innovators are always welcome to tinker and test. It will be interesting to hear other responses on your inquiry!
... View more
08-20-2025
06:31 AM
|
0
|
1
|
145
|
IDEA
|
@JurajKrumpolec Thanks for the idea - I see a lot of value in your idea and personally use the steps outlined. Have you explored Data Engineering ? It's newish but very nifty in providing these data insights and more.
... View more
08-20-2025
06:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
476
|
POST
|
@NickKoopman Each organization's environment is unique. I can only provide generic guidance based on the limited information available. Direct access to the database is not available/allowed through ArcGIS Web Adaptor in typical branch versioned environment. Someone must explicitly open the database access through the firewall. There are additional checks that may be implemented: Implement reverse proxy in a DMZ Protect Default Version in the enterprise geodatabase Apply fine grained capabilities for external users to only edit in named version. It is possible to restrict users from creating version, deleting version, reconcile and post to Default version. Good references at ArcGIS Trust Center: ArcGIS Enterprise implementation guidance ArcGIS Architecture Center: Working in secure environments
... View more
08-18-2025
08:53 AM
|
1
|
0
|
373
|
POST
|
@NikkiCronyn You will benefit from the following resources at the ArcGIS Architecture Center. Selecting a deployment pattern for imagery data management Selecting a deployment pattern for self-service mapping Each topic covers SaaS and on-premise deployment patterns.
... View more
08-15-2025
12:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
104
|
POST
|
Quoting Dr. Malcolm (Jurassic Park): "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should." @CalvinHarmin Technically it is possible to have mixed Traditional and Branch versioned objects in an EGDB. In my implementation best practice, I would not recommend a mixed transaction model. It adds to user confusion and system overhead with data maintenance as well as system integrations.
... View more
08-14-2025
08:19 AM
|
2
|
1
|
480
|
POST
|
@NickKoopman Switching to branch versioning should have clear drivers and be a well-thought out process (plan, design, test, implement). During planning, revisit the architecture and stated database setup. Some key considerations: Organization size and GIS data volume Purpose: What workflows will your data support User types: Office GIS analysts, mobile workers, public users, decision-makers — each has different performance and access needs. Data update frequency: Is it real-time, daily batch, or occasional? Performance: acceptable performance criteria System Integration Security and Access Control As stated by @DavidSolari branch versioned geodatabase is more efficient. Due to this many organizations have collapsed the data architecture layers. Small organizations use a single branch versioned geodatabase to support Editing, Viewing and Field Work. Since branch versioned editing is done through feature services, the same database can be use for viewing through other map services. Field work can be supported using Feature Sync through Feature Services. You may not need the traditional geodatabase replication in a future state with slimmer data architecture. Consider these options, along with your organizations unique requirements to come up with a design that works well.
... View more
08-14-2025
04:31 AM
|
0
|
6
|
493
|
POST
|
@ElsitMandal1 Thanks for posting the screenshot; this helps. Suggest reviewing the LRS Locks table and correlate with the documentation. If there's an edit on the shared centerline, the LRS Locks table will show locks on both Routes. This is expected behavior. If only event on North south route is edited and has an event lock, with no locks on the route itself. Then the East west route (with shared centerline) should not have a lock. Try releasing the event lock and check if that resolves the issue. Reference: Conflict prevention > Conflict prevention during centerline editing
... View more
08-11-2025
07:32 AM
|
0
|
1
|
325
|
POST
|
@ElsitMandal1 I can just guess based on the description; it would help if you post a screenshot. Note that locks are at the route level - not the centerline. That's the only way to maintain the integrity of calibration on routes. So a shared/concurrent centerline, even small segments, would lock the corresponding route(s).
... View more
08-11-2025
06:05 AM
|
0
|
3
|
333
|
POST
|
@ElsitMandal1 Where concurrent routes exist, routes are locked based on common centerlines. Reference: Conflict prevention > Conflict prevention during centerline editing
... View more
08-11-2025
05:00 AM
|
1
|
0
|
359
|
POST
|
@LRoberts_RDM Quick follow-up, please post a screenshot of the Prune Branch History tool parameters. Specifically, the Only Prune System Tables parameter. Do you see any difference checking/unchecking this option.
... View more
08-01-2025
07:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
364
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 07-21-2025 08:19 AM | |
1 | 05-31-2024 06:39 AM | |
1 | 08-18-2025 08:53 AM | |
2 | 08-14-2025 08:19 AM | |
1 | 08-11-2025 05:00 AM |