AGSCoding implementation for AGSFeatureLayer AGSFields incomplete?

Discussion created by eddof13 on Sep 9, 2011
Latest reply on Sep 12, 2011 by njarecha-esristaff

I am using the online/offline sample, which uses the AGSCoding protocol to do the conversion to and from JSON for the offline caching. However, it appears that when the AGSFeatureLayer is encoded in the JSON representation, it ignores some properties.

In particular, the 'editable' and 'length' properties of the AGSField values.

Is there a reason why it ignores these particular fields? Do I need to implement my own AGSCoding protocol in this case?