|
POST
|
Hi Alessandro Valra, Thanks for reporting the crash. I will check and get back to you in a day. Could be a tool related issue.
... View more
09-12-2019
09:57 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1820
|
|
POST
|
08-05-2019
12:08 PM
|
5
|
0
|
4923
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jamal NUMAN, We don't have the export to graphic in ArcGIS Pro currently. We have written the code for it, but have not added it to the release due to a weird bug with our third party library. I understand your frustration. Meanwhile, may be use snagIT or other such apps to screen capture your model. The resolution may not be the best as compared to exporting it as a vector format. We are hoping to get the export function in to the next release of ArcGIS Pro. Also, our request to all who have responded on this thread to take the survey: http:/bit.ly/esrimodelbuilder and give us feedback on the things you want to see improved or added in ModelBuilder. It helps us respond to the issues that all of you are facing in a more effective way. Thanks!
... View more
08-05-2019
12:08 PM
|
5
|
0
|
4923
|
|
POST
|
Hi Roland, Have you tried running it from the rest end point? Is it failing even from this? https://hydro.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/Tools/Hydrology/GPServer/TraceDownstream/submitJob How big is the data? Are you creating lot of intermediate data? Can you share a snapshot of the model? Thanks!
... View more
07-12-2019
04:37 PM
|
2
|
1
|
2275
|
|
POST
|
Looking forward to meeting you Curtis Price Please pass this survey link along to all your colleges and friends who use ModelBuilder. Thanks! http://bit.ly/esrimodelbuilder
... View more
07-05-2019
01:55 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1135
|
|
POST
|
All, This survey is designed to gather the list of enhancements, new features and/or problems you have faced using ModelBuilder. The ModelBuilder team at ESRI wants to make your experience of authoring and consuming workflows a smooth one. Please do share your ideas and opinions. We are listening! http://bit.ly/esrimodelbuilder Thank You! ModelBuilder Team @ESRI
... View more
07-03-2019
01:23 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1312
|
|
IDEA
|
Hello Andrews, Unfortunately, for this field list control there is no way to turn off the field alias and show just the name. I understand the problem with multiple alias and i see why this is bad, but for now you would need to change the alias. We usually encourage no duplicate field names or alias for this reason. Testing to check If the Geocode Address is creating any duplicate alias. Our Geocode team members or I will let you know. Also, for Alter multiple fields tool - we do have an open issue to write this new tool that allows altering more than one field so that models do not bloat. It is currently in discussion.
... View more
06-05-2019
11:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5208
|
|
POST
|
Hello Duncan Hornby, Reporting capability is useful to those who run models periodically. The report gives them a way to compare between runs for failures or value changes. About its benefits and the work that is still pending - 1) Gives an overview of the entire model with its variables, processes, value and messages. 2) Two way editing between model and report that can be synced automatically or manually (being worked on) 3) Overall model statistics about processes, total time to run the model, sub models, iterations etc (being worked on) 4) Embedded optional model metadata (In design) 5) Model notes to keep track of model history between analysts (in future releases) 6) Two way selection highlights and visual indication (being worked on) 7) Updated style sheet and capability to save the report as pdf (future release) 😎 Report comparison and visual feedback (Long term plan) Hope this helps. Thanks for starting a dialog on this topic!
... View more
06-03-2019
11:24 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1613
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks for your suggestions Marco! I understand icons have a very immediate visual connection and model parameters might make sense on top for some cases. We will add this to our to do list, but not as a priority for now. I see your point on auto-fitting the size while scrolling. This is definitely an issue. Thanks for reporting!
... View more
05-15-2019
10:55 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1885
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jamal, No, you will not loose any tools or behaviors in ModelBuilder as you move to Pro. The only thing missing is Export to Python functionality that existed in 10x and till some version of Pro, but is currently not included in Pro's latest release. In fact, we have added new functionalities such as: Logical tools, Searching for model elements in a model, Filtering elements based on a flag in a model (the filter icon next to search box in the model view), Searching and adding tools in model directly by typing the tool name, Diagram (layout and routing options) Batch processing/models Besides ModelBuilder in particular we have added many great tools and capabilities in Geoprocessing. Please do try these new capabilities in ArcGIS Pro. If you, or any one on this thread have ideas or need for any functionality in ModelBuilder that is missing, please do share it with us. We are listening. Thanks!
... View more
03-15-2019
04:10 PM
|
7
|
2
|
2197
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jamal, If you click on the Auto Layout Button it makes the lines straight while working with the model. Currently, the links routes are not saved with the model. However, we do have an open issue to preserve the link shapes on saving a model. Sorry, for the inconvenience it is causing, but we are working to fix the issue. Thanks!
... View more
03-15-2019
10:00 AM
|
7
|
4
|
2197
|
|
POST
|
Hi Robert, Thanks for reporting this issue! Is it possible for you to share the model? Is it the old model that has exhibited this issue before or was the model created at 2.3? Can you copy and paste the problematic calculate field tool in this model and a new model and see if the issue goes away? Can you also try save as on the model with the problematic cal field tool and check if the new model shows the issue?
... View more
02-13-2019
10:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1279
|
|
POST
|
Beau Johnson Please can you share the snapshot of the model and the tool dialog of the tool where the add to display dos not work from the GP tool dialog? Probably it is intermediate and is getting deleted from the gp tool dialog. Make that output a parameter and it will work.
... View more
09-17-2018
09:12 AM
|
1
|
0
|
5421
|
|
POST
|
Hi Kyle Balke, This is a know issue. We are working to fix it. This behavior exhibits only in few cases. To get past this bug please re-add the calculate value tool. If you could share the repro steps you took that led to the tool getting in this state. For example, did you share the toolbox or model? copy pasted it? added in previous release and now it just shows like this in 2.1? Also, If you can share the original model that would help us take care of all fringe cases. Thanks!
... View more
01-31-2018
10:07 AM
|
2
|
2
|
4257
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 04-02-2026 11:53 PM | |
| 3 | 12-03-2025 10:47 AM | |
| 4 | 11-13-2024 11:37 AM | |
| 1 | 08-28-2023 05:43 PM | |
| 1 | 08-31-2023 02:03 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
04-23-2026
08:54 AM
|