Latest Contributions by ShitijMehta

‎03-30-2023

Hi ChridD, I see we already shared it with the analyst. Pls ignore my request above.

‎03-30-2023

Hi ChrisD, Please can you share the snapshot of your model and if possible indicate which tool in the workflow are you editing that shows the error of running from the previous tool/s? We have two open issues that we are working on related to this for the current upcoming release. We had a fix which was risky and hence did not add it to the version that was just released - 3.1 or backported to any patch. I just want to make sure we have covered all the cases. Thanks for reporting and your help in advance!

‎03-29-2023

Hi rburke, I tested with 3.1 and I am able to rename with hyphen when the model is closed. When a model is open the slow edit rename is blocked. Please can you create a video for us to see this potential bug? Thanks!

‎02-14-2023

Hi Bud, Thanks for this idea! I have a few questions: From the proposal - tell me if I got this right - the proposed tool basically inserts one row at a time and adds value to different fields in that inserted row. To understand a bit more - What would be your workflow after this? Would you want to insert another row? which means you will rerun the tool again with different values for each field? The newly added row will not have a feature associated with it at the point of inserting this new row/s. So, say we add two new rows, you will have to add a new feature for each row later or you are creating 1:many (1 feature and many rows for that feature?) Thanks!

‎12-16-2022

Hi Brent, Please can you share your model or a snapshot of it? Thanks in advance!

‎12-16-2022

Hi Chris, Possible to share the model or a snapshot of it please? Thanks in advance!

‎12-16-2022

Hi, We can repro a case but want to make sure it is exactly what you see. Possible to share just the model or a snapshot of it? Thanks!

‎12-15-2022

Hello all, We re investigating right now and based on that we will prioritize it immediately. The tools rerunning unnecessarily is definitely non needed.

‎11-17-2022

This blog is part of a "Now you know" series that shares new functionalities/tricks you can use for efficiency or to solve a case in your workflow. There are several ways to add geoprocessing tools to a model, including the following: Use the ModelBuilder ribbon Drag tools from the Geoprocessing pane Drag tools from the Catalog pane or Catalog window (including your own models and scripts) The options above depend on your work and preference, but there is a better way; adding tools from within a model. To add a tool within a model, click anywhere in a Model view and start to type the name of the tool. The Add Tools To Model dialog box opens with a list of tools. The following will be listed: All system tools ModelBuilder specific tools Your model and script tools within the project Double-click a tool from the list to add it to the model, or select many tools and drag them to your model. Adding tools in a model Watch for our upcoming posts in this "Now you know series".

‎11-16-2022

Hello DuncanHornby, Get field value just gets the value only and not the geometry. In case where you are returning a polygon the output is empty. I don't thing we should be showing the shape in the get field value tool as a valid choice to for field to get the value from. a bug for us. You can still pass test2 to cal value tool directly as inline and then describe it and get the extent/etc from it. Hope this helps.

‎11-15-2022

a is a feature class/layer/ string with path. I am describing it to get the extent like the test2 polygon in your first comment. Share your model or image of the cal val tool dialog and the workflow before and after that. If you want to get the first row value - get field value is the right tool, but why do u need the first row value and what value is it?

‎10-07-2022

‎10-07-2022

Hi Jamal, Thanks for your suggestion! We have this under consideration in our product plan. I agree, that Rename on the context menu would be good. We do allow the edit in place, so if you click on the name of the model in the catalog, it will allow you to go in the rename mode. The caveat is that the model should not be in the edit mode. If you are editing the model, we block the rename and force you to go through model properties to avoid in-sync errors. None-the-less an explicit Rename with enabled/disabled state would add value. We really appreciate all your feedback!

‎03-23-2022

Hello Eric, We do have font manipulation such as font type, size, color, alignment on the diagram ribbon tab. Please try that. We do not have border and background colors settings right now. The labels do participate in layout and we will fix that. Thank you!

‎02-28-2022

Hello, We definitely have considered this or the idea of validation on demand. Having said that, partial validation is possible for elements when the downstream tools from the selection are also included in the selection set. Which means if you select tool 2 and have 4 tools after that, validate select will be forced to validate downstream as they are dependent on what happens on tool 2. If we don't do that there are chances that the dependent tool will fail during the run which is OK, but will cost time. Can you share a snapshot of your model and if possible show me which part for your test case would make sense to validate partially? This will help us see what is important for your case. Thank You!

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎04-23-2026 08:54 AM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by ShitijMehta

Re: ModelBuilder resets tools to 'ready-to-run' state

Re: ModelBuilder resets tools to 'ready-to-run' state

Re: Rename with '-' when renaming in catalog pane/view

Re: Insert Feature/Row geoprocessing tool

Re: ModelBuilder resets tools to 'ready-to-run' state

Re: ModelBuilder resets tools to 'ready-to-run' state

Re: ModelBuilder resets tools to 'ready-to-run' state

Re: ModelBuilder resets tools to 'ready-to-run' state

Now you know series - 1 - Adding tools

Re: Does the model only tool Get Field Value honour the geometry column in Arcpro 3.0?

Re: Does the model only tool Get Field Value honour the geometry column in Arcpro 3.0?

Re: ArcGIS Pro 3.0.2: Having a rename option when right clicking the model, - Status changed to: Under Consideration

Re: ArcGIS Pro 3.0.2: Having a rename option when right clicking the model,

Re: Label Functionality in ArcGIS Pro Modelbuilder - Status changed to: Needs Clarification

Re: Validate selected tools in Model Builder - Status changed to: Needs Clarification

Re: Zoom modelbuilder

Re: Is the new ArcGIS Pro 3.6 model builder comple...

Have you heard? ModelBuilder is now available in A...

Re: Custom Parameters Reset to Default in Model af...

Re: Iterate Field Values not working on Values wit...