IDEA
|
Please consider allowing ArcGIS for Server federation with ArcGIS Online. We have many on-premise ArcGIS Server deployments using either 'token' based authentication or 'web-tier' (Microsoft Integrated Windows Authentication). For publicly hosted 'secured' content we are striving to shift towards the use of enterprise logins with SAML to tie in our corporate identity stores and solve Two Factor Authentication (TFA). Currently, the only way to integrate with SAML on an ArcGIS Server is to federate it with a "Portal for ArcGIS" product (on-premise ArcGIS Online). While technically that is feasible, we are struggling managing two public portals: one for cloud hosted content (ArcGIS Online) and one for on-premise hosted content (ArcGIS Server). We would like to expose our on-premise content to our ArcGIS Online portal (via server federation) so that we can use only 1 portal and meet requirements to integrate with SAML. The user experience switching between portals (from ArcGIS Desktop and Collector for ArcGIS) are not intuitive to end users. Thanks!
... View more
06-01-2016
06:46 AM
|
79
|
5
|
5461
|
IDEA
|
Please consider allowing ArcGIS for Server federation with ArcGIS Online. We have many on-premise ArcGIS Server deployments using either 'token' based authentication or 'web-tier' (Microsoft Integrated Windows Authentication). For publicly hosted 'secured' content we are striving to shift towards the use of enterprise logins with SAML to tie in our corporate identity stores and solve Two Factor Authentication (TFA). Currently, the only way to integrate with SAML on an ArcGIS Server is to federate it with a "Portal for ArcGIS" product (on-premise ArcGIS Online). While technically that is feasible, we are struggling managing two public portals: one for cloud hosted content (ArcGIS Online) and one for on-premise hosted content (ArcGIS Server). We would like to expose our on-premise content to our ArcGIS Online portal (via server federation) so that we can use only 1 portal and meet requirements to integrate with SAML. The user experience switching between portals (from ArcGIS Desktop and Collector for ArcGIS) are not intuitive to end users. Thanks!
... View more
06-01-2016
06:46 AM
|
75
|
5
|
4431
|
POST
|
Hi Rebecca, We cache our services in a separate ArcGIS Server Site (built only for caching), then move the cache to our test environment where the data people can review and approve the cache. Once its approved we 'release' it to production. The original cache server was a measly 1 vCPU with 4GB RAM. Cache build took over 8 hours. We acquired some new beefy hardware with GPU's attached that are intended for a XenDesktop deployment for ArcGIS Desktop, Imagery software, and ArcGIS Pro. That project has been moving slower than we like, so we started using a small portion of that hardware for our cache builds... we presented 28 vCPU and 100GB ram on a VM to windows 2008 and the cache build is now around 2.5 hours with 27 instances.
... View more
02-18-2016
05:59 PM
|
0
|
1
|
888
|
POST
|
Hi Yi, We have the same scenario. We've been building cached services to level 14 (~1:36K) which takes about 32GB of disk storage (processing was 8 hours, but we beefed up the server significantly and got that process down to 2 hours). Dynamic service at full extent is terrible performance (30-90 seconds). Since the bounding box is so small at level 15 and below (much less data is returned that needs to be fetched, processed, and rendered) the performance is sub-second on the dynamic requests. An example cached service: https://gis.blm.gov/arcgis/rest/services/lands/BLM_Natl_SMA_Cached_with_PriUnk/MapServer And Dynamic Service: https://gis.blm.gov/arcgis/rest/services/lands/BLM_Natl_SMA_LimitedScale/MapServer Consumed in example application: https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/eplanning/lup/lup_register.do You can see in the network traffic that the requests switch from the cached service (level 14) to the dynamic service: Although this has been working pretty well for us, some of our business programs want to be able to enable and disable layers in the cached service. Unfortunately the have not been able to do that so we have had to build multiple cached services for their use (each service has layers enabled/disabled based on their requirements): Unfortunately this approach requires us to store the cache 3 times (at ~30GB each) and have to re-process the data 3 times each quarter also (~2 hours each now). Cost of doing business... I would be in favor of a service having the ability to cache to a certain scale (level 14) then automatically switch to a dynamic request when it is not cached below that level! maybe a post to ideas.arcgis.com is in order... Thanks to Dan Huber who helps us with this process!
... View more
02-18-2016
03:51 PM
|
2
|
3
|
888
|
POST
|
OK... re-opening this thread. The ArcGIS Server v10.3.1 release extended the limit from 11 installations to 21. Although we hit our 22nd yesterday and tested out the manual install. Manual install work around is still good, but it would be great to have native support for more than 21! I submitted an ideas thread about it today for anyone that wants to vote up): http://ideas.arcgis.com/ideaView?id=087E0000000kBh8IAE 🙂
... View more
02-18-2016
03:07 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1080
|