Latest Contributions by JoeBorgione

Great. I just got a new laptop so I’ll install 2.8.2 today! ... View more

When you convert you spreadsheet to a table, what is the Altkey data type? Numeric, text?   Without knowing I can only speculate  the Altkey field in your ‘shape file’ is numeric while the Altkey in your table is text. Emphasis on speculate. It could be that when mapping fields it picks the objectid as the first numeric field encountered. See if you can map to the table’s Altkey field manually. That would indicate the field type is numeric.  ... View more

@RobertHolliday did you get anywhere with tech support?  I ask because I had an unrelated case case open and discussed this topic with the analyst. He then provided the same solution @ShaunWalbridge does above but he told me the actual bug fix won’t be until 2.9.    Can we get a definitive answer from ESRI ? @KoryKramer   ... View more

@KeithOlson et al- I just got off the phone with ESRI Tech support.  This problem is fixed at version 2.8 and above.  I'm seeing the problem at 2.7.4 but apparently it started at 2.7 and I just never noticed it. There is a definite ying and yang tp updates.  As a python user I have been hesitant to upgrade to 2.8 as I've heard of python environment bug.  Apparently that problem exists at 2.8.1 and above; development is aware of it and it is supposed to be fixed at 2.9.  Ironically, if all goes well I'll be retired by the time 2.9 is released.  I'm not sure if I'll upgrade to 2.8.x; there are a number of work arounds for the python bug... ... View more

@ZacharyUhlmann1 If you apply a field calculation with no records selected, the calculated value is applied to all records. ... View more

Good catch... ... View more

Rats... ... View more

Just a shot in the dark, but don't you need to enclose things in curly braces?   if (first(fsResult) IN $originalfeature.cab_id){ return true; }else{ return false; } ... View more

I'm going to give this a shot. ... View more

@KeithOlson   Other options: ..such as renaming the feature class, removing a coded value domain, disabling attribute rules, or recalculating spatial index. After performing each change and undoing said change, the issue would not persist.  The spatial index option seems to me as the least invasive.  Unfortunately I don't see a way automate calculating the spatial index.  There are tools (and subsequently a pythonic automation approach) for Adding indexes and Removing them, but not (re)calculating them...  In my case we use attribute rules, and there is a python approach to Disabling them as wells (re) Enabling them that I may look into. ... View more

@curtvprice   A throwback to the coverage data model.... ... View more

@Deborah_Priss & @zhongying_gan   What version ArcGIS Pro are you using?   The link Deborah provides shows Pro 2.5. ... View more

Be careful with match without house number; that can really goof up your results.  If I provided the solution, feel free to 'Accept as Solution'. ... View more

Congratulations on your Retirement, and welcome to the forum Mog! ... View more

I'm in the Spyder camp (thanks to @DanPatterson ).  One word of caution however; installing packages in ArcGIS Pro 2.8 is problematic.  There is a bug where changing to a cloned environment does not work.  I'm holding at 2.7.3 until that gets fixed. See this thread... ... View more