Latest Contributions by EmmaHatcher

You just reminded me of a great application the State of Alaska Dept. of Commerce utilizes to provide a series of web apps and maps using the Map Journal Classic StoryMap template. It's linked here in case it might be a useful example for your team! https://dcced.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=3bfb4237e6304f9aa4029a01715e15f9 ... View more

Hi @ShengdiZhang , My problem isn't configuring a custom pop-up (that's what I've already done, and it's looking great), it's that the Feature Info Widget in EB is configured only using the Map Viewer pop-up. Like I explained in my original post, this creates redundant information for users between the Map EB widget and the Feature Info EB widget. When they click on a point in the map, the pop-up is the same display and information as the Feature Info widget. They would rather only have the Feature Info widget with no pop-up. OR better yet, if the map pop-up could have just the site name, and a button that jumps to the Feature Info widget below the map with more detailed information, that would be great. But at the moment, you can't configure the two separately. Here is my map pop-up:   And below the map, is the same information, which is the preferred view: Thanks, Emma ... View more

I'm not sure if your goals with this Experience Builder are to showcase sites/apps, or to be more data-driven. If it's the former, a hub site would be much better suited to that goal. If it's the latter, you can better accomplish this by reducing the number of web maps as much as possible and using widgets to provide the same data views the multiple web maps and apps were accomplishing. One bummer is that there are many widgets in WebApp Builder that don't have equivalents in EB, as I'm sure your team has discovered, so if there are must-have widgets on the embedded apps, they might try a story map or hub site still as alternatives...  I found a major drop-off in performance with a draft EB that included even just three web maps. Instead, I changed the design to a single web map and leveraged lists & filters to accomplish the same map views that I had been attempting using more of a tabbed approach with separate maps (and I can't overstate multiple web maps led to terrible performance for me). That massively improved performance. Even if you want to show different data in each view, rather than subsets of data, you can set up action triggers using a key field between the list and map that will return no results for whatever layers don't need to be shown. The other thing to check is if the web maps themselves have good performance. If the final web map has large, complex polygon layers, for example, it might still be slow in EB until you take steps to optimize the web map's performance itself. Hope that's somewhat helpful... I haven't used pages yet in EB though, so I'm not sure how that complicates the picture. ... View more

Hi @TonghuiMing , Yes, our users are on windows, and many use FireFox. I am not personally seeing the issue in Chrome.   Thanks, Emma ... View more

This would be so helpful!!! ... View more

Well darn, that has worked for me with SQL queries in Python where I have apostrophes in the table values... But it looks like @DanPatterson may have the solution with using "don\'s"! ... View more

This will work if you replace single apostrophes with double apostrophes (and I mean double apostrophes, not quotation marks) in your python code. So your variable would be p1.filter.list = ["a", "b", "don''s c", "d"]. I know, it's kind of weird, but so it is. Best of luck! ... View more

You can do this with two Lists an a trigger action set on the first List. The first List would be your counties, and your second list would be the associated programs. You would set up a trigger on the counties List to filter the framework, including the associated programs List, based on a key field between the two tables (this does make the Query Table moot for the Experience Builder). I have a similar set up to handle a few one-to-many cases between feature services with one of my Experience Builder pages. See the result of this pictured below: First list selection applied, with the result in the second list:   Hope that's helpful! ... View more

Hi David, I have two list widgets in a draft Experience Builder that don't have selections upon initial load, but once people start adding their selections and filters, refreshing the page retains these selections and filters. This preservation of previous app states is unexpected behavior for my organization's users. I'm not sure why it's behaving differently for me compared to you, however, as @Wei_Ying mentions it's a known limitation... You can verify with this link. The three region options and the areas tab are both list widgets. I didn't select anything in the configuration that I know of... but I'll let you know if something jumps out. Either way, we need a way to disable the storing previous states behavior when the browser is refreshed... ... View more

Hi David, Any updates with this bug?  Many thanks, Emma ... View more

This would be very helpful for my organization as well!! This is been one of the sticking points for my organization in adopting a public-use sport fishing locations explorer built using Experience Builder. While applying filters works well for people, they are getting hung up on when they want to change filter parameters because they have to remember to click all of their previous selections to disable them. A simple "reset" option would go a long way for user-friendliness. ... View more