|
POST
|
It's possibly ArcGIS Online being a bit funky. I'd retry later/sign out sign-in again. Also ensure you have the rights to change the properties etc. Also just make sure it's not a View, as the properties are inherited from the parent Hosted feature layer.
... View more
04-08-2025
02:18 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1148
|
|
POST
|
I would clear up your data first by removing any B and C features you don't need. Select Layer By Location (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation - For B and C, select and remove features which have this relationship with A - 'Boundary touches'. make copies of your data and delete records from those. name them something logical to refer back to e.g. B_doesNotTouchAboundary For the spatial joins and one-to-many - you're possibly going to have a whole load of records if you run the operation twice for B and C on A. e.g. join 1 produces 10 'duplicate' features, join 2 then increases that to 100 (assuming 10 'duplicates' from each operation.
... View more
04-08-2025
12:39 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2584
|
|
POST
|
Yeh I experienced the same when Survey123 Connect seemed to update itself. It seems this _form view will always get created for Connect version 3.22 and later. Not ideal if you have a organisational workflow already set up. Survey123 _form hosted feature layer view - Esri Community
... View more
04-07-2025
03:42 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1220
|
|
POST
|
Have you tried a FeatureSet? feature_set = arcpy.FeatureSet()
feature_set.load("url.../FeatureServer/0")
... View more
04-06-2025
01:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
491
|
|
POST
|
Set the coordinate system of the target Feature Class to the same as the WFS. You can Project to whatever you require after that.
... View more
04-06-2025
01:24 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1513
|
|
POST
|
It may be the maxRecordCount of your feature layer if you're able to adjust it in Server or Portal.
... View more
04-06-2025
01:22 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1576
|
|
POST
|
It seems to be expect/designed behaviour, and this explanation makes perfect sense. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/required-fields-in-survey-form-still-allow-null/td-p/866601 For the feature layer on ArcGIS online, the required question has the setting nullable:"true" by-design, this is because sometimes the required question is used as a relevant question, and when it is not relevant, the required question should be hidden and allowed to submit as null.
... View more
04-03-2025
04:48 PM
|
0
|
1
|
954
|
|
POST
|
You'll probably have to play about with raster operations An overview of the Generalization toolset—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation , something like Expand and Shrink. If it was me, I might be tempted to use Raster to Polyline Raster to Polyline (Conversion)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation and use the simplify option then maybe some manual cleanup or use of other Generalization tools.
... View more
04-03-2025
02:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
504
|
|
POST
|
Hi all, ArcGIS Online (AGOL) and Survey 123 - Private Survey (shared to AGOL group) Submissions via S123 (I'm assuming updates go to Hosted Feature Layer (HFL)) and/or an API which updates the '_results' HFL View Webhooks set during testing on various iterations and combinations of the S123-side webhook, HFL and HFL view. _results layer present to keep submissions private - even between group members (rather than replicate a survey for each sub-group, as it's not scalable or practical) No _form results layer as this is published in an earlier S123 version - just parent HFL and _results HFL view I'm having real issues testing a webhook (to send an email confirmation of user submission) from AGOL. Users can submit records to a HFL _results view via an bespoke API - only the API can see the _results HFL view. A webhook is set on this HFL view and works, although it seems to take 10-20 minutes to trigger for unknown reasons. So the API submission emails work but are a bit delayed, but OK I can deal with that. Next issue - email notification should also be sent for submissions via the S123 app. This is where it gets confusing. It seems with only the webhook set on the _results HFL View, some submissions trigger the View's webhook and some don't. These ones are delayed by 4-6 hours if not more, and lead me to think there's some kind of synch check between the parent HFL and the HFL view, but I can't find any details about how this might be working (not to be confused with offline synch as that's disabled for all items). and the next - OK, so let's put a webhook on the HFL and then that should trigger from S123 submissions (as that's what S123 is POSTing to right?), again, temperamental and delayed. next.. even if it works a charm on both, then this update synch process might start generated 2 confirmation emails. next... OK let's set the S123 website-side webhook. Now we're talking... that works almost instantly, but we still need the _results HFL view webhook to do emails for API submissions. This is likely going to cause this double-email with its weird synch/triggering process. has anyone else felt my pain with these, any anecdotes, details, docs or interactions with support gurus from Esri who have shed light on this arcane webhook functionality? Thanks for reading!
... View more
04-03-2025
02:07 PM
|
0
|
1
|
771
|
|
POST
|
No simple way I can see. You can see the .xml schema in the survey folder (Files icon in the LHS tab) but that's not very friendly as you'd want to parse it into something more readable. Same goes for downloading the gdb and exporting the xml workspace document. the fields option of the data tab in ArcGIS online might be an easier screengrab. I think the cleanest option is looking at the data from the hosted feature layer in ArcGIS Pro and right click - design - fields. that should be a nice clean view although not all the survey123 relevant info is there. You can also select all and export to Excel etc.
... View more
04-02-2025
04:06 PM
|
0
|
1
|
727
|
|
POST
|
I appreciate this is obvious, but you've refreshed the folder/GDB in the catalog pane with a right click? Also may be within a Feature Dataset. Is it a feature class or some uncommon data type? If you have any screengrabs that would help.
... View more
04-02-2025
03:39 PM
|
0
|
1
|
643
|
|
POST
|
I think you've got some slithers of overlaps from the datasets. Certainly recommend Jack's approach, and possibly Tabulate Intersection (Analysis)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation might help you to figure out what's going on with the potential overlaps - or may be used to achieve the join instead (remove <1% overlap etc).
... View more
04-02-2025
03:37 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2133
|
|
POST
|
Hi learned friends, Field Maps v 25.1.0 Build 1529 (I believe latest). Android OS I'm testing a Mobile Map Package .mmpk which is packaged in ArcGIS Pro and shared to ArcGIS Online. Users would then download the .mmpk from Field maps onto their devices and work offline if needed. I've done many of these .mmpks before without issue, for various geographic regions. The .mmpk for this new region I'm testing is packaging and sharing to ArcGIS Online without error, but upon downloading and attempting to open in Field Maps I'm getting this error: unable to open SQLite: 12 Unable to open the Geodatabase file within archive, sqlite open failed. and another user trying it is getting a slightly different but similar error. (all attached) From memory, this .mmpk is probably the largest I've created. (1.98 GB) I've re-ran the process 3 times now and still the same error, also making sure to delete the previous .mmpk in AGOL rather than overwrite. Because of the possible size issue, I then tested a 50/50 split of the geographic area, and it worked as expected. I can't find much info on possible size limits and the .mmpk contains several geodatabases rather than just 1 big one. However due to the error message I am leaning to some sort of .geodatabase size limitation. The .mmpk also opens/works fine in ArcGIS Explorer Desktop and when imported into ArcGIS Pro. .mmpk contents (approx): .vtpk basemap - 954 MB address points (.geodatabase) - 198 MB .geodatabase1 - 405 MB .geodatabase2 -345 MB 6 other .geodatabases - all total up to 30 MB I've also raised a support ticket with Esri. Thanks for your time.
... View more
04-01-2025
03:49 PM
|
0
|
2
|
618
|
|
POST
|
What's tempSymbRaster? it seems to be defined outside of your function. I think that's the culprit.
... View more
03-31-2025
11:47 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1664
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06-13-2025 01:08 PM | |
| 1 | 09-25-2025 03:19 PM | |
| 1 | 09-24-2025 02:35 PM | |
| 1 | 09-17-2025 02:42 PM | |
| 1 | 09-10-2025 02:35 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
01-14-2026
12:10 PM
|