Latest Contributions by DavidPike

‎04-11-2025

What does the table look like (how many variables)? 1 variable - Choropleth works great (but it seems you have more than 1 fertilizer type) 2 or multiple variables - Bivariate or Multivariate Choropleth? Although Bivariate is probably the limit of easy conceptualisation for viewers.

‎04-11-2025

If there's no common field to match to or a logical way to create a common field e.g. table 1 - GEOID000567 table 2 - 567 -> Create new calculated field for table 2 and then match against -> 'GEOID000' + [table2] Other than manually adding a matching attribute then joining - you'll need to find a new polygon data source. I would imagine there's many alternatives.

‎04-11-2025

Do you possibly have the setting 'Editors can only see their own features'? Export may then be limited to admins or data owners (have found this temperamental even so).

‎04-10-2025

Not sure if you can hack it in arcpy but generally no - FAQ: Can Adjacent Polygons Be Combined to Create a Multipart Polygon in ArcGIS Pro?

‎04-10-2025

What are you doing manually?

‎04-08-2025

It's possibly ArcGIS Online being a bit funky. I'd retry later/sign out sign-in again. Also ensure you have the rights to change the properties etc. Also just make sure it's not a View, as the properties are inherited from the parent Hosted feature layer.

‎04-08-2025

I would clear up your data first by removing any B and C features you don't need. Select Layer By Location (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation - For B and C, select and remove features which have this relationship with A - 'Boundary touches'. make copies of your data and delete records from those. name them something logical to refer back to e.g. B_doesNotTouchAboundary For the spatial joins and one-to-many - you're possibly going to have a whole load of records if you run the operation twice for B and C on A. e.g. join 1 produces 10 'duplicate' features, join 2 then increases that to 100 (assuming 10 'duplicates' from each operation.

‎04-07-2025

Yeh I experienced the same when Survey123 Connect seemed to update itself. It seems this _form view will always get created for Connect version 3.22 and later. Not ideal if you have a organisational workflow already set up. Survey123 _form hosted feature layer view - Esri Community

‎04-06-2025

Have you tried a FeatureSet? feature_set = arcpy.FeatureSet() feature_set.load("url.../FeatureServer/0")

‎04-06-2025

Set the coordinate system of the target Feature Class to the same as the WFS. You can Project to whatever you require after that.

‎04-06-2025

It may be the maxRecordCount of your feature layer if you're able to adjust it in Server or Portal.

‎04-03-2025

It seems to be expect/designed behaviour, and this explanation makes perfect sense. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/required-fields-in-survey-form-still-allow-null/td-p/866601 For the feature layer on ArcGIS online, the required question has the setting nullable:"true" by-design, this is because sometimes the required question is used as a relevant question, and when it is not relevant, the required question should be hidden and allowed to submit as null.

‎04-03-2025

You'll probably have to play about with raster operations An overview of the Generalization toolset—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation , something like Expand and Shrink. If it was me, I might be tempted to use Raster to Polyline Raster to Polyline (Conversion)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation and use the simplify option then maybe some manual cleanup or use of other Generalization tools.

‎04-03-2025

Hi all, ArcGIS Online (AGOL) and Survey 123 - Private Survey (shared to AGOL group) Submissions via S123 (I'm assuming updates go to Hosted Feature Layer (HFL)) and/or an API which updates the '_results' HFL View Webhooks set during testing on various iterations and combinations of the S123-side webhook, HFL and HFL view. _results layer present to keep submissions private - even between group members (rather than replicate a survey for each sub-group, as it's not scalable or practical) No _form results layer as this is published in an earlier S123 version - just parent HFL and _results HFL view I'm having real issues testing a webhook (to send an email confirmation of user submission) from AGOL. Users can submit records to a HFL _results view via an bespoke API - only the API can see the _results HFL view. A webhook is set on this HFL view and works, although it seems to take 10-20 minutes to trigger for unknown reasons. So the API submission emails work but are a bit delayed, but OK I can deal with that. Next issue - email notification should also be sent for submissions via the S123 app. This is where it gets confusing. It seems with only the webhook set on the _results HFL View, some submissions trigger the View's webhook and some don't. These ones are delayed by 4-6 hours if not more, and lead me to think there's some kind of synch check between the parent HFL and the HFL view, but I can't find any details about how this might be working (not to be confused with offline synch as that's disabled for all items). and the next - OK, so let's put a webhook on the HFL and then that should trigger from S123 submissions (as that's what S123 is POSTing to right?), again, temperamental and delayed. next.. even if it works a charm on both, then this update synch process might start generated 2 confirmation emails. next... OK let's set the S123 website-side webhook. Now we're talking... that works almost instantly, but we still need the _results HFL view webhook to do emails for API submissions. This is likely going to cause this double-email with its weird synch/triggering process. has anyone else felt my pain with these, any anecdotes, details, docs or interactions with support gurus from Esri who have shed light on this arcane webhook functionality? Thanks for reading!

‎04-02-2025

No simple way I can see. You can see the .xml schema in the survey folder (Files icon in the LHS tab) but that's not very friendly as you'd want to parse it into something more readable. Same goes for downloading the gdb and exporting the xml workspace document. the fields option of the data tab in ArcGIS online might be an easier screengrab. I think the cleanest option is looking at the data from the hosted feature layer in ArcGIS Pro and right click - design - fields. that should be a nice clean view although not all the survey123 relevant info is there. You can also select all and export to Excel etc.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	a week ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by DavidPike

Re: How do I map percentages within a polygon??

Re: Basic Census Join Problem

Re: Export function not working

Re: Create multi part polygon with parts that have adjacent edges

Re: Joining multiple layers with overlap

Re: Unable to enable editor tracking on feature service

Re: Joining multiple layers with overlap

Re: Survey123 _form hosted feature layer view publish with Survey123 Connect

Re: Issue with url declared in python

Re: Polyline in the wrong location with Arcpy and InsertCursor

Re: How to replicate Select By Location with input of an entire layer?

Re: Known bug? Survey123 Connect schema not precisely syncing in ArcGIS Online

Re: Raster Editing

ArcGIS Online Hosted feature Service and View Webhooks

Re: Printing the schema section from the Survey123 Connect app

Re: Define Projection crack-down

Re: Generate polygons that represent historic air ...

Re: Enterprise geodatabase connection slow - machi...

Re: Discrepancy between measure tool and expected ...

Re: Why does the geographic transformation involvi...

GIS Jobs