|
POST
|
If you consider the main part of your stormwater system to be 'connected', then there are several ways you could describe these features. You could say they are disconnected (from the main system), they are islands of connectivity, or they are disjoint sets of features.
The term subnetwork is used by the utility network to mean something very specific; a subnetwork is the collection of features that are traversable to a subnetwork controller. In the case of stormwater systems, its every feature that is traversable to an outfall or outlet.
To identify these features in a trace network, you could set starting points on all your outfalls/terminal discharge locations, then run an upstream trace (Trace (Trace Network)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation). Switch the selection set on all your network layers (Select Layer By Attribute (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation with the SWITCH_SELECTION option). This would give you the collection of all the features that have no outlet, and is a good place to start for a reasonable amount of effort.
If you wanted to find all the distinct islands, you could do a connected trace for every line (or device or junction) in the network, output the JSON, and parse the elements to see how many features are connected to it. As you iterate through the features and results, keep track of which features you've already discovered so you don't trace the same feature more than once.
... View more
10-09-2024
06:13 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3854
|
|
POST
|
One of the global IDs in that file references a feature with an asset type that does not have the subnetwork controller category.
Join the CSV file to your device table and review the asset types of all the matches to find the feature causing your problem.
... View more
10-09-2024
06:00 AM
|
1
|
0
|
720
|
|
POST
|
That field is only on classes that have terminals. Devices and non-spatial junction objects.
... View more
10-09-2024
05:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3238
|
|
POST
|
You use attachment and containment associations to create relationships between structure and domain features that allow you to see which structures are supporting which subnetworks or to include them in your trace results.
If you have a device attached to the pole this will happen automatically, but if you don't have any other equipment at a pole you can place a junction feature on the line then attach that junction to the pole. In the electrical model these are line ends and attachment junction features.
... View more
10-07-2024
12:06 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1991
|
|
POST
|
There's no technical limitation one-way or the other. That comes down to an organizational decision of whether you want a single portal user to administer both datasets.
... View more
10-02-2024
06:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
889
|
|
POST
|
This topic is discussed in this article: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-blog/best-practices-for-working-with-utility-network/ba-p/1339979
You have a lot more control over how features appear through using a web map than you do with a map service, and this is the recommended approach. Each service you publish also consumes additional resources on the server. Publishing 100 different services to support 100 different maps is not scalable but publishing 1 service that is used by 100 maps is.
You typically maintain a small number of features services that expose your enterprise data (see above article), then your web maps provide different experiences on top of these services.
... View more
10-01-2024
07:40 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2317
|
|
POST
|
In terms of performance and limitations, it is as I outlined in my previous reply. You are the first person I've encountered who is attempting this configuration and I'm not aware of any reported limitations, outside of any limitations associated with using either of these datasets.
Before going into uncharted waters, I would ask myself whether the potential benefits outweigh the risks and how quickly I could adjust course if it doesn't work out.
... View more
09-25-2024
06:47 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1944
|
|
POST
|
There will be some overhead in editing and validating since you have two sets of controllers each with different dirty areas, rules, and validations. You'll also want to be mindful of any restrictions to web/mobile workflows when using this dataset since you will be limited to the features of the dataset with the most restrictions in each case.
... View more
09-24-2024
10:23 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1964
|
|
POST
|
Doing well. I thought we tidied up the online documentation to be more explicit about from/to device terminal not being related to flow or flow direction, but it looks like we've still got some work to do on that front.
... View more
09-23-2024
03:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2361
|
|
POST
|
If you run a trace and get the connectivity result type you can see this information in the trace results.
If you are only interested in one feature, or don't want to trace, you would need to use a spatial query to get the features that intersect either end of the line. If you are just interested in the features at the endpoints (i.e. the from/to device) then you would use an 'intersects clementini' spatial operator.
... View more
09-23-2024
02:58 PM
|
0
|
0
|
856
|
|
POST
|
Your problem is that you assumed that the transformer was going to be at the first vertex of the line when it is in fact at the last vertex of the line. It is 100% acceptable for the transformer to be at the last vertex of the line because the utility network doesn't rely on the digitized direction to control flow, and electrical networks don't rely on the digitized direction of lines to control flow/tracing. If we did, then you wouldn't be able to backfeed a circuit by opening a switch because all the medium voltage lines would be drawn in the wrong direction.
The flowdirection is unrelated to that error, and even if you were to deploy a v6 network without the attribute you would still have the error. The problem is that you have populated the fromdeviceterminal with the terminal id of the device at the todeviceterminal position of the line. Remember that fromdeviceterminal and todeviceterminal refer to the device at the first vertex (from device) and the last vertex (to device) of the line, and not related to the flow of the network (i.e. which device is upstream).
... View more
09-23-2024
02:49 PM
|
2
|
1
|
2370
|
|
POST
|
The FlowDirection attribute is a system field that was added to the utility network at v7. It shouldn't affect tracing unless you specify the 'use digitized direction' option in tracing, which has limited/no application in an electric network.
v7 / upgrade history help: Utility network upgrade history—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
v7 blog: What's New for the ArcGIS Utility Network with the 2024 Network Management Release (esri.com)
digitized direction help: Configure a trace—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
digitized direction blog: Introducing Tracing Using Digitized Direction in the Utility Network (esri.com)
... View more
09-23-2024
02:27 PM
|
0
|
3
|
2381
|
|
POST
|
It is a layer, like any other in your feature service. Look at your feature service, get its layer id, and use the query method to find dirty areas with a status value that indicates they need to be validated.
... View more
09-23-2024
09:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
808
|
|
POST
|
That's the expected error you get when you try and validate without checking to see if there are dirty areas that need validating in the extent. You should check for dirty areas that need validating before calling that method. Just like you should check for dirty subnetworks before calling update subnetwork. Running update isconnected is not necessary if you run UpdateSubnetwork, since subnetworks manage the isconnected field.
... View more
09-23-2024
08:42 AM
|
1
|
1
|
2759
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 03-30-2026 07:24 AM | |
| 1 | yesterday | |
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | a week ago |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|