Select to view content in your preferred language

parcels large enough for a 1,000 yard shot

3472
5
Jump to solution
12-04-2014 08:55 AM
JustinBarnard
Emerging Contributor

I have been asked to create a list of parcels that are large enough to provide a 1,000 yard shooting range on. Parcels don't need to be any certain minimum size regarding overall area, rather within the parcel you could have a "line segment" 3,000 feet in length. I have some 30,000 parcels to consider.

Line of sight would eventually need to be considered but right now I would be happy with just knowing what parcels have the shape/area large enough for a 3,000-ft line segment within it.

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
BenLeslie1
Frequent Contributor

Dan Patterson's version of this tool may be better for you - it automatically calculates the length and width of the rectanges it generates (and there are no licence restrictions).

http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=564e2949763943e3b9fb4240bab0ca2f

View solution in original post

5 Replies
DarrenWiens2
MVP Honored Contributor

You can exclude a lot of candidates by running Minimum Bounding Geometry (geometry type = RECTANGLE_BY_WIDTH). If neither MBG_Width nor MBG_Length are greater than 3000', it can't have a line of sight greater than 3000' (at least, I can't think of a situation where this could be true).

edit: it looks like you can use GME's Calculate Fetch in Polygons, however it may take a long time without excluding noncandidates as described above.

0 Kudos
BenLeslie1
Frequent Contributor

Dan Patterson's version of this tool may be better for you - it automatically calculates the length and width of the rectanges it generates (and there are no licence restrictions).

http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=564e2949763943e3b9fb4240bab0ca2f

DarrenWiens2
MVP Honored Contributor

For rectangles produced by the out-of-the-box MBG tool, the length and width are automatically calculated (and there are no license restrictions).

0 Kudos
JustinBarnard
Emerging Contributor

Dan Patterson's version of this tool worked great! Thanks for the help!

0 Kudos
JustinBarnard
Emerging Contributor

Dan Patterson's version of the bounding tool worked like a charm.

0 Kudos