Hi,
I manually created a public transit-enabled network dataset in ArcGIS Pro 2.5 for a city's MRT system (streets = OSM data), because there is no GTFS for the city that I am analysing available. All the analysis functions in the Network Analyst directly implemented in ArcGIS as well as the Transit Network Analysis Tools | GTFS in ArcGIS work perfectly for my network.
Now I wanted to try out the BetterBusBuffers | GTFS in ArcGIS . However, it seems to require a GTFS file to create a SQL database as input of the tools. Is there any way to use the tools with the public transit-enabled network dataset I manually created in ArcGIS Pro?
It would be a pity that after I put so much time into manually setting up the network dataset that I could not use the analysis functionality of Better Bus Buffers tools.
Best regards
Christian
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hello Christian. Unfortunately, no, not yet. BetterBusBuffers is a much older tool, and I have not yet created a version that works with the much newer officially-supported public transit data model in ArcGIS Pro. It's been on my to-do list for a while, though, and your request bumps it up in priority slightly. You can follow along with the status of this item here: Make BetterBusBuffers work with the Network Analyst public transit data model · Issue #137 · Esri/pu...
So I can better understand your needs and plan my strategy, could you answer a few questions for me?
Hello Christian. Unfortunately, no, not yet. BetterBusBuffers is a much older tool, and I have not yet created a version that works with the much newer officially-supported public transit data model in ArcGIS Pro. It's been on my to-do list for a while, though, and your request bumps it up in priority slightly. You can follow along with the status of this item here: Make BetterBusBuffers work with the Network Analyst public transit data model · Issue #137 · Esri/pu...
So I can better understand your needs and plan my strategy, could you answer a few questions for me?
Hello Melinda,
thanks for your reply! Seems like I will have to find a workaround or adjust my analysis goal slightly for the first.
To answer your questions: