'Object-oriented' Change Detection in Operation

1546
2
09-12-2014 01:17 AM
larryzhang
Frequent Contributor
0 2 1,546

From variant index images (like NDVI) derived from time-serial remote sensing images, both the ‘spatial variation’ and ‘temporal variation’ for multiple disciplines could be defined, which are widely available, in particular, in the literatures. However, most of those research results show high uncertainty and low reliability.

In practice, in order to *accurately* define spatial variations or detect spatial changes directly from time-serial images or index images, many technical challenges are required to be solved.

For example, in GIS and land management, how *effectively* to detect spatial changes of landcover over time (i.e., landuses, building lots, fences, tree crowns, etc.)?

Obviously, algorithms for change detection /defining spatial variation are mostly different from feature extraction, including traditional change detection algorithms and object-oriented algorithms.

For last few years, many researches and practitioners have been discussing object-oriented Change Detection with eCognition and ERDAS Objective.


With eCognition, it uses the multivariate alteration detection (MAD) transformation (by Allan et al, 1998; Nielsen & Conradsen, 1997), which is based on the established canonical correlations analysis.


However, it looks that MAD might be challenging, as a ‘real' object-oriented solution for Change Detection in accurate way.

Inversely, ERDAS Objective uses Discriminant Function Change algorithm to help extract change features, which demonstrates direct and efficient way to map ‘spatial variation’ and perform change detection...

2 Comments
larryzhang
Frequent Contributor

ERDAS Objective

ENVI Feature Extension

Trimble eCognition

Feature Analyst | Textron Systems

JorgeFernandez
Deactivated User

I had experience working with eCog.

During my Msc thesis I was developing rulesets that tried to detect cracks and holes automatically on facades and roofs of different building types. (It's still on a discussion stage, but this is a paper I wrote after my thesis where you can find more details: http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/2/5603/2014/nhessd-2-5603-2014.pdf)

My experience with object based image analysis (OBIA) is that it's based in a rather simple concept but when you get to try what you have in mind it becomes extremely complex and variable. You can make a ruleset to work for one scenario, but that same ruleset is going to, most likely, lead to confusing or wrong results in a rather similar scenario. Rulesets tend to be taylor made for ONE image.

About the Author
A veteran GEO engineer in petroleum and mining industries, specialized on digital twin & mapping (business and urban assets by drone mapping and mobile mapping), geomatics (geospatial intelligence, GIS), and geology (geological mapping, quantitative exploration). Vigorously devoted to GEO analytics and GEO Intelligence, especially data integration and integrity for data center over HPC and cloud infrastructures....