BIM files for infrastructure projects—such as highways and other large-scale developments—are typically created in Civil 3D or Revit. However, these models are usually divided by discipline (e.g., drainage, earthworks, structures) or by specific project features. As a result, a single project often consists of numerous separate BIM files.
Autodesk addresses this complexity with Navisworks, a tool specifically designed to aggregate multiple BIM files into a single, lightweight and manageable format: the NWD file. This format provides a consolidated view of the entire project, which is essential for coordination and review.
Given this context, it's critical that ArcGIS Pro natively supports NWD files. If the goal is to centralize multiple BIM projects within a geographic environment, it makes little sense to require complex and time-consuming workarounds to bring these models into GIS. Without native support, the integration process can become unfeasible—both in terms of time and cost—especially for large projects.
Supporting NWD files directly in ArcGIS Pro would streamline workflows, reduce barriers to BIM+GIS integration, and significantly enhance the value of spatial analysis in infrastructure development. @sanderllandawillindecosta
Hello @sanderllandawillindecosta
Right now Navisworks is not currently on the road map.
Have you though about using the source data (Civil3D, Revit of IFC) for your workflow?
David
Hello David, @DA_BIM-GIS
Thank you for your message.
Yes, I’m already working extensively with Civil 3D, Revit, and IFC data — I’ve even published a few use cases here in Brazil showcasing this workflow. However, the approach I suggested is closely related to the smoother integration between Autodesk and Esri environments.
In complex BIM projects, designers often generate multiple files across different disciplines. While working directly with source files is possible, it becomes a challenge to maintain a fluid integration into GIS platforms due to the fragmented nature of these deliverables. That’s where tools like Navisworks could greatly simplify the process by aggregating and streamlining the models before pushing them into GIS.
I understand that Navisworks is not currently on the roadmap, but I believe it’s worth investigating how these projects are typically developed by designers and how the resulting data is delivered to GIS professionals — the gap there is significant and often underestimated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.