Jeff (as you've referred to yourself),
I GOT THROUGH!! Thanks so much! I couldn't believe it was that simple! I feel dumb! I read that same help for FocalStatistics you sent, only for 10.1, and that's where I got confused. I was trying to figure out initially how to build that equation you suggested within Raster Calculator, when those terms other than "Focal Statistics" in the equation are already functions of "Focal Statistics".
I'm getting some really huge values for my comparisons though. Up to 2020.31! Does that sound realistic? I got that particular value when I compared a 15m resolution DEM derived from a Topographic map re-sampled to 30m, (as my "true"), and an ASTER derived DEM of 30m resolution (as my test dataset). This comparison was done for the entire land mass of Trinidad though.
Do you think, considering difference in currency of the datasets and development that would have taken place over the years, and perhaps errors in georeferencing etc, that a value for RMSE could be so high?
Thanks in advance (again)!
Kendall