Can anybody help me about the limitation of using projected data over geographic coordinate system.
I can think of a few...but certainly not limited to...
Given these very few limited examples, it should be obvious that describing "where are we" is difficult enough, but when you add the other dimensionalities, the issues that need addressing compound drastically.
Thanks a lot for your answer. As far as i know, all of the projected coordinate system consider earth as sphere, where as earth is not truly sphere. Is there any implication for that in raster processing?
Not all projected coordinate systems treat Earth as a sphere. In fact most define an equatorial radius and a polar radius , or an inverse flattening, as evidenced in this UTM Zone 18 spheroid definition:
portion of *.prj extracted ...SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]...
All considerations, whether a sphere or spheroid will have an impact on the issues I address, for both raster and vector data. Due note, the geoid hasn't even been considered.
To expand a little, many projections that are designed to display the whole world like Mollweide, various Eckert ones, and so on do have sphere-only algorithms. Projections that support large and medium scale data (including all conformal projections) have ellipsoid and sphere algorithms.