What would be an appropriate workflow for a site selection analysis when beginning with rasters of mixed cell size and different units of measurement (feet and meters)? It's been a long time since I've done one of these and I know the basic workflow when starting with matching data sets but before that I'm unsure. Any help would be appreciated.
some steps can be combined, but I would
You didn't mention different projections... that is a tough call, but I would project to a common coordinate system in the desired planar units. There may be issues with maintaining a couple of the point above consistently.
In any event,
I probably have missed some and/or got a few out of order... again a few can be combined into one step.... if you aren't sure, do the steps individually. and... get coffee and make notes on paper
Addendum
The obvious... short paths, local data sources and destinations, no spaces, pay attention to dat type (ie avoid bit upscaling when possible, try a common nodata value when possible), In short... anything that will foul a result
Thanks for your reply. The only real file I have right now for this project is a land cover raster at 1 meter resolution. The other data sets (DEM and slope) I was planning on creating from our 2 foot contour data, but I was unsure if I should match the cell sizes of the new rasters I create to the land cover (it sounds like I should). Our coordinate system is State Plane (feet). Should change my unit of measurement to feet on the land cover data set and then generate a DEM from my contours to match the cell size of the land cover? I think I can set up most of this in the environment settings if I remember correctly. Thanks again so much for your help!
consistency and documentation is the key Annie. Anything that you skip or gloss over may have to be redone later... so choosing your cell size, extent and those other issues first will lay the groundwork for subsequent processing and analysis... good luck