Hello, I've created a geolocator that has alternate name tables. My primary table is fulfilling the parcel role and my alternate table contains addresses for those parcel IDs. The join field I am using for the alternate table is the parcel id.
However, whenever I reverse geocode, I don't see the address associated with the parcel, I stead I just see the parcel id in the result.
Is it possible to return the alternate name table values in the results of a reverse geocode?
Is the Parcel name the only locator role field that is mapped for the primary role? Does the primary parcel data not have address info associated with it and why you are using an alternate name table? What are the results when you search for an address in the Locate pane or geocode a table?
Have you tried joining the table with the addresses to the primary parcel data using the Parcel ID, then building the locator? Then reverse geocode.
-Shana