Our IT team are planning to replace our shared remote desktop server (RDP host). The new server will ONLY be used for people to connect and run ArcGIS Pro 3.2.
The IT team would like some clarification around the specs of the new machine to make sure we get it right. We have been unable to find specific answers to their questions in the ESRI documentation for which the specifications are for a single-user PC (ArcGIS Pro 3.2 system requirements—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation). Additionally, ESRI (Australia) support tells me "hardware specification recommendations for ArcGIS Pro ... falls outside the support we can provide" and "we are unable to provide information regarding hardware setups". then they recommended posting here instead. So here 'tis...
This host will service up to 10 users simultaneously. So we need to figure out how much RAM, CPU, GPU, etc, is appropriate for this kind of use. Please see our IT’s questions below:
These are specs we are thinking of, but wanting to know what you either recommend or what other clients that you know are running in similar situations:
* We are looking at setting up Hyper-V up on this server and run the Arc GIS Pro client on a virtual machine, being assigned 95% of the server resources as it will be the only VM.
Additional questions:
If we are storing [much] of our GIS share data on this server (around 2TB worth [in file geodatabases]), is there any reported benefits or disadvantages of using SATA SSD vs SAS SSD vs NVMe SSD?
Are there any ArcGIS Pro users here with similar needs who can comment on what is working well for them? Specifically for around 10 simultaneous users on the one machine.
Additional resources that may be of help:
https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/virtualization-overview.htm
ArcGIS Pro: Virtualization On-Premises and in the Cloud
This community leans more towards spatial users. It may be worthwhile posting from the opposite direction, in more IT-based forums, outlining the software requirements.
It also depends on what your users are doing. Workflows that hit the GPU - certain analysis tools and 3D work - will require more consideration even in a single user environment. The resources above draw a lot of parallels between ArcMap and ArcGIS Pro in terms of GPU usage.
Here is another data point in terms of hardware for up-to 25 users: https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/media/pdf/hardware-partners/dell/dellvirtualization...
Not apples-to-apples, but gives some context.
Is this a bare metal deployment..(no virtualisation) you may be able to use a top end workstation GPU
I've previously shared a Quadro RTX5000 with 5 users.
Hi Graham.
I'd like to do something similar to what you're suggesting. ArcGIS Pro on Windows RDS direct on tin. (No hypervisor). Can you tell me if you where successful? Any gotchas or limitations that you can think of?
Pete