ArcGIS Pro 3.3 performance

[HollyTorpey_LSA]

Is anyone else noticing any performance issues in Pro 3.3? We are, but I'm trying to figure out if it's a Pro update issue or something in our network/system configuration (or a combination of the two). Would especially love to hear from others who have updated to Pro 3.3 on a multi-session virtual desktop where users use Pro to work with data stored on cloud-based fileshares.

Thanks in advance! 

[SangHyouk_Oum]

We have a similar experience to share. I have a script that performs memory-intensive tasks using ArcPy, which has been running for years with both ArcGIS Desktop and Pro. Normally, the script takes about 3 days to complete. However, after upgrading to ArcGIS Pro 3.3 recently, the same script now takes more than 2 weeks to finish. After downgrading to version 3.0.6, the speed returned to "normal."

[KyleLandon]

I am also getting a lot of CShareQueue timeouts in the log. ArcGIS Pro is just taking forever to render even simple maps or apply symbology changes. I'm using a high performance virtual machine and am on 3.3.1.

EDIT: I noticed there was a 3.3.2 update and I installed it. I also set ArcGIS Pro to clear Cache on exit and to use DirectX 12. It seems way better now.

[AllenovDmitriy]

I'm not using any clouds, but ArcGIS Pro 3.1 works perfectly compared to the horror of the 3.3 update. It has become impossible to work with new patches.

[TomDe_Leus]

3.3 is terribly slow, some times OK, but then suddenly adding a layer whatever takes very long,  bcomes impossible to work ...

[ReamonnMFealy]

Just to add that our experience is very similar to all that described by others above. For what its worth CSharedQueue Stall timeout is also a strong feature in our Diagnostic Monitor logs...

[mdumas_SILC]

Anyone every find a solution for this? I've been experiencing this for months on a variety of machines.

[Michael_Kraus]

We are also getting lots of CSharedQueue Stall timeout errors - very impactful and detrimental to performance.  Running 3.3.2

[AyanPalit]

Recommend reviewing the following resources:

Troubleshooting Performance Issues in ArcGIS Pro
Diagnostic Monitor
Performance Assessment Tool

[jorisfrenkel]

Ouch, this sounds really bad. 

Any updates on this? Is 3.3.5 an improvement? 

We are planning to upgrade from 3.1 to 3.3, because an essential Add-In we use is not working on 3.4.

- Joris

[DavidLight]

Pro 3.3 is very slow for us as well.  Any resolutions?