Manually adjust dynamic labeling rather than making annotation

1075
2
05-14-2015 06:47 AM
Status: Open
MattJohnson
New Contributor II

With the recent release of ArcGIS Pro and better labeling and symbolizing ribbons instead of mulitple windows, cartographic production will be increasing. Labeling is still one of those task that we all spend a lot of time working on though. Merging the possiblities of dynamic labeling to get most labels placed and then converting to annotations to clean up and add other labels is the only solution right now to create labels that are more cartographically apealling. My idea is to make it possible to dynamically/auto label using the MapPlex option and then have the ability to manually adjust then lock text that I am happy with the placement of. This would reduce data management and allow faster map production. I could easily see this being possible with the new threading capability of the ArcGIS Pro application but would also like to see ArcMap be optimized to be able to draw and label faster with this new labeling technique.

2 Comments
RobertBorchert
I also like this idea.  What I envision from what you suggest is having a special tool that you can select the dynamic lable with and you manuall place it where you want.  I would further envision a setting such that when you have moved it a given distance a leader will pop into place.

As a refinment to the suggestion what it may result in is placing a Rotation Angle and a Distance from the feature into the feature.  For point features it would Add a value to the Rotation field, which could be either straight or horizontal or perpendicular Alignment Type.  And then add a distance.

Until it happens here is what I do and it works very well.

I add a LablerRotation and LableAngle attribute and make them both short integers.  You can even domain them with a range from 0 to 359.

I then go to every point that has a lable issue and specify a LableRotation...using a Horizontal Allignment.
For Points that a Straight Allignment would work better I enter a value for LableAngle.

I set up rules in labels, if <LableAngle is Null and LableRotation is not Null> then it will lable based on rotation etc...

the component I would like to see added is the ability to set the distance based on a field.

Your proposition is a WYSIWYG format that would be very handy indeed.

But for now give my idea a shot.

I do it based on the output scale that is most common.  i.e. township level. It may be cumbersom at first. but once I set everything it stays.  When you zoom out it will then cause overlap, but any that you zoom in it will maintain its integrity.
JaredHaas
We should definitely have the ability to manually place dynamic labels.  Converting them to annotation, moving a dozen of them around, and then deciding you want to change the font and having to start all over is a real pain.  Countless hours are being wasted on this task.

The manual placement of dynamic labels would likely be lost if the map scale were changed, so perhaps when this option is in use, the data frame defaults to Fixed Scale?  If the scale were to change and placements reset, it would be nice if the manual placement could be remembered when the map returned to the original scale.  Even without that ability, it would be a huge step forward.

It would just be nice to have some middle ground between completely automated labels and completely manual labels.