Select to view content in your preferred language

June 2026 Update - Issue with intersect calculations

337
6
3 weeks ago
WillyG
by
Frequent Contributor

Hi. This was working perfectly pre June 2026 update. 

I have an intersect calculation here, using FeatureSetbyName $map. It also uses a field which is hidden by conditional visibility to select the project area if project areas overlap.  The way it is designed if there are no project areas to choose, the field does not appear, and it instead gets the value from the single project area

Since the update, when I draw the feature it does not calculate but I move it slightly after drawing it, it does. This is currently not practical for the end user. 

(see attached gif)

Kind regards, Willy

CPT2607010707-746x171.gif

6 Replies
CraigGillgrass
Esri Regular Contributor

@WillyG are you able to share map so we can look at it to investigate?  One way to do that is to invite my user "craig_sp" to the group this data is in.  Feel free to reach out to me on this through a DM.

WillyG
by
Frequent Contributor

Hi Craig. No worries.. I'll add you to the relevant group(s) and DM you when I have done that

0 Kudos
CraigGillgrass
Esri Regular Contributor

@WillyG I believe this issue is running into the same issue we discussed in the DMs; removing the expression  to return the attachment-count should correct this.

0 Kudos
WillyG
by
Frequent Contributor

Thank you @CraigGillgrass  Yes. That resolved the issue we were having. Thank you very much 

0 Kudos
David_McRitchie
Esri Regular Contributor

Hey Willy,

I had a support case come in that matches this behaviour. This got logged under BUG-000186071. 

It is currently in the Product Plan so hopefully will be resolved soon. If you want to be updated on its status I would recommend raising a support case with your distributor and ask that they attach the defect to your subscription.

 

 

 

Esri UK -Technical Support Analyst
0 Kudos
CraigGillgrass
Esri Regular Contributor

BUG-000186071is a different issue @David_McRitchie 

We're looking at it but do not have a timeline for a fix.

0 Kudos