Thanks for the help. I don't remember the exact order of steps to get to my final results, but I ended up figuring it out. Christopher, your links and info were helpful.
Something I wanted to note on here from my experience of going through this.... Our project involved adding a point in field maps, and then taking a picture, while we were constantly moving. In our case, we were moving about 3-5mph during collection. What happened, was that the exif info from the photos (using the photo to points tool to gather direction, photo xy, etc) had a different xy than the original point captured with Field Maps, due to the time it took to click the buttons and line up a picture. So, we ended up with points from the photos, with a direction, that didn't line up with the point collected with Field Maps. For us it was important that the original point be moved to the location of the photo's xy. We ended up moving/snapping the original points to the actual photo point locations. PITA-- I manually moved a few thousand of them. I'm sure there was a better way than manual.
Another thing to note, while it seemed the xy info for the photos was pretty accurate, the direction info was OK in some areas, and others, it was opposite and/or non-sensical. Since we did all of this after the collection process, we did not pay exact attention to how the device was oriented throughout the many days of collection. We used an iPad Air (5th gen). Overall, I think the direction of the points will be helpful for those that reference that information.
This was all done in an 'offline' environment.
