hello,
Yesterday I passed the repair patch on my impacted VM 1091. He uninstalled everything and it actually took a lot of time. I need clarification on the following points:
Thank you very much for your feedback and allowing me to finalize the repair process.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Yes. The validation/repair tool takes it back to a 'pure' install.
If you were fully patched then it should have removed ten patches. Some of those have become 'cumulative' so you now only have to install 3 or 4, but they all need to be applied.
Yes. The validation/repair tool takes it back to a 'pure' install.
If you were fully patched then it should have removed ten patches. Some of those have become 'cumulative' so you now only have to install 3 or 4, but they all need to be applied.
@Scott_Tansley I'd also add that it's pretty poor from ESRI not to warn that this uninstall process could take a long time. Ours has been running for over 4 hours now when normal patching takes us about 15-20 minutes tops. We could have scheduled this for out of hours had we known.
I hear you, but at least it wasn’t 10.8.1 with its slower uninstallers/installers.
Agree. The Esri software QA team should be able to provide an estimate regarding how long it takes to install this patch in their documentation (ex. 2 to 4 hours depending on how many patches must be uninstalled) for customers to better plan the install and execution of the "validation and repair tool" - which was a self-inflicted error (releasing a bad Portal security patch) by Esri Core Development in the first place.
another agree here.
I would love to see an article on best practices for patches to reduce the long time. Ours frequently take 20-30 minutes each. I am curious if antimalware software comes into play and should be disabled during patching.