Select to view content in your preferred language

ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1: A record in the reviewer results session table disappears as it’s updated when working with data reviewer,

969
7
Jump to solution
09-14-2022 08:34 AM
JamalNUMAN
Legendary Contributor

ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1: A record in the reviewer results session table disappears as it’s updated when working with data reviewer,

 

In the screenshots below, the record of feature #210 disappears as it’s updated and marked as “resolved”.

 

What could be the issue here?

 

My understanding is the record should be kept in the table in all its life cycle: review, correction, and verification status

Clip_77.jpgClip_78.jpgClip_79.jpgClip_80.jpg

 

----------------------------------------
Jamal Numan
Geomolg Geoportal for Spatial Information
Ramallah, West Bank, Palestine
0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
JayCary
Esri Contributor

Thanks for sharing your workflow!

The development team has reproduced this behavior in ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1 and it appears to affect project configurations where Reviewer results are co-located with the data actively being edited. To avoid this issue, please use a separate geodatabase to store your Reviewer results.

The team has logged an internal bug for this issue and it will be fixed in the next release of ArcGIS Pro.

If needed, please contact technical support to start an incident to document this issue. This will enable you to track the progress of this incident.

View solution in original post

7 Replies
JayCary
Esri Contributor

Is the error result actually still in the database or is the error result being moved out of the current view due to the sort currently applied to the pane?

 

JamalNUMAN
Legendary Contributor

The issue can be reproduced as follows:

 

  • Select a feature and commit it with “delete feature” as “error type”
  • As the record of this error appears in the review results session table, zoom to it
  • Select the feature that has the error and delete it
  • Go back to the record that represent this error review results session table and update it
  • Once the “apply” is clicked in the “update result” pane, then the record disappears

 

The screenshots below shows the steps above

 

Clip_120.jpgClip_121.jpgClip_122.jpgClip_123.jpgClip_124.jpgClip_125.jpg

----------------------------------------
Jamal Numan
Geomolg Geoportal for Spatial Information
Ramallah, West Bank, Palestine
0 Kudos
JayCary
Esri Contributor

Thanks-much for the clarification!

I would suggest turning-off your error layers to ensure that you are not accidentally deleting the error feature during your edit.

JamalNUMAN
Legendary Contributor

Does deleting the feature that has an error gets its record deleted from the reviewer result table?

 

All what I do is deleting the feature that has an error and then its error gets deleted when performing the update

 

Clip_141.jpgClip_142.jpg

----------------------------------------
Jamal Numan
Geomolg Geoportal for Spatial Information
Ramallah, West Bank, Palestine
0 Kudos
JamalNUMAN
Legendary Contributor

Attached is a video that demonstrates the issue I’m struggling with

 

Clip_150.jpg

 

----------------------------------------
Jamal Numan
Geomolg Geoportal for Spatial Information
Ramallah, West Bank, Palestine
0 Kudos
JayCary
Esri Contributor

Thanks for sharing your workflow!

The development team has reproduced this behavior in ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1 and it appears to affect project configurations where Reviewer results are co-located with the data actively being edited. To avoid this issue, please use a separate geodatabase to store your Reviewer results.

The team has logged an internal bug for this issue and it will be fixed in the next release of ArcGIS Pro.

If needed, please contact technical support to start an incident to document this issue. This will enable you to track the progress of this incident.

JamalNUMAN
Legendary Contributor

Great. It works like a charm

 

Enabling the “reviewer results” in a geodatabase different from the one that accommodates the feature classes being handled resolves the issue. This workflow is more appropriate and makes sense.

 

Thank you for the prompt help

 

Clip_185.jpg

----------------------------------------
Jamal Numan
Geomolg Geoportal for Spatial Information
Ramallah, West Bank, Palestine
0 Kudos