POST
|
Thanks for the update, but I'm still confused regarding the 1st question. If I put a layer on the localhost, it will be accessed by calling http://localhost/mylayer.kml, and Lite license will allow reading of this KML (it's working, I've tried it), but is that violation of the license? The layer is accessed via http protocol, but the content is not "hosted remotely", thus violating the license? Or perhaps not, since "designed/intended" are not so strong words (from legal perspective). Marko
... View more
12-18-2018
04:22 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2035
|
POST
|
Mike, have you managed to get any information from ArcGIS Runtime product managers, regarding this licensing issue? Thanks, Marko
... View more
12-18-2018
05:20 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2035
|
POST
|
Morten, thank you for your reply. Just for your information, I'm not developing in developer mode, I'm using free Lite license. And, local layers are not supported by that license, but I can access local layers on localhost. Since the Standard license (approx. hundred bucks per app) is needed for local layers (they are not available on Basic license, either), I see the localhost as some kind of support for local layers without purchasing Standard license. But, the question remains: is this a workaround, or hacking? I will post my question in some other community, in order to get an answer. Thanks!
... View more
12-07-2018
04:19 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2035
|
POST
|
I have a doubt regarding license restrictions for ArcGIS Runtime .NET 100.x: Lite/Basic licenses levels do not have support for local layers (KML, Shapefiles, etc.) according to https://developers.arcgis.com/arcgis-runtime/licensing/ But, what does it mean: they don't have that capability, or you're not allowed to use local layers at this license level? 1) If I put layers on localhost, or some local web server, am I allowed to use them in my App with Lite or Basic license? 2) Or, if I write my own KML parser, am I allowed to use it for local files with Lite or Basic license? I'm not sure if my question is clear. This is what I mean: 10 years ago, Google Maps tiles were accessible to any app (today, they aren't), so you could use them in your own app, but actually you were not allowed to do so (you needed to use their API). That is my doubt here, does license level restricts something, or it just doesn't provide that capability? And, if you provide that capability by yourself, you're not going to jail . Is that true? Thanks!
... View more
12-06-2018
03:12 AM
|
0
|
7
|
2339
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:25 AM
|