POST
|
I have the exact same issue.. Need to get feature services offline for Collector. Following these guides: Prepare data for offline use—Documentation | ArcGIS Enterprise For tradition versioned data: gobalIDs on, data registered as versioned, relationship classes using globalID field.. Sync enabled when publishing, no errors when publishing.. None of the services are available offline, "supportsApplyEditsWithGlobalIDs" is always false. I'm using Enterprise 10.7.1 and have never before experienced any issues getting Collector maps offline! What is going on?
... View more
01-14-2020
11:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1056
|
POST
|
I'm confused on this as well, because like the OP I found those statements in the documentation, and I have several relationship classes using GlobalIDs, however, I am unable to take my map offline in Collector because "supportsApplyEditsWithGlobalIDs" property is set to false. I found this tech page which suggests you CAN NOT have a GlobalID-based relationship class and use it offline with Collector... (and yes I DO have unique attribute indexes as the "workaround" suggests) Problem: The Supports ApplyEdits With Global Ids parameter is set to false Has anybody figured out how to accomplish this? I need the relationships to be GlobalID-based because it would be such a pain to set up a back-end way of managing GUID fields for all our Collector data!
... View more
01-13-2020
09:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5047
|
POST
|
It's attached to the original question at the top..
... View more
12-19-2019
02:01 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2303
|
POST
|
The problem with hiding the field is that we don't know which one the user is going to be filling out ahead of time so they both need to be visible. Can an if statement work in the appearance field? I tried your suggestion, it's not a syntax issue because all the statements I've tried work on one field, but as soon as I put it in both fields it breaks. Here is a test form I've been experimenting on. Basically both fields should be visible and required when the form loads, as soon as a value is entered in one of the fields, the other needs to become not required and either hidden or read-only. And like I said it works if I only have that logic implemented on one of the fields I get the desired behavior with the other, but it seems like it can't handle it on both.
... View more
12-19-2019
08:23 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2303
|
POST
|
Why is it that I cant have an if statement in both field readonly columns, something like: if(${Planned_Total_Cost},'','yes') if(${Planned_Cost_PerArea},'','yes') And similarly in the required column except with the 'yes','' switched. That would solve the problem I believe. If I use one of those if statements for either total cost or cost per area in both required and readonly fields I can get the desired behavior for the other field, but it seems S123 can't handle both at the same time! Attached is the error I get which is odd because it mentions two fields, relevant and calculate which I am not using..
... View more
12-13-2019
04:20 PM
|
0
|
4
|
2303
|
POST
|
Hi all S123 users! I am in need of some xlsforms trickery. I am building a survey for a client trying to replicate an old dinosaur of a desktop application they are using to manage some land assets that has very specific business logic associated with some fields.. There are 2 problematic fields I need a solution for at the moment, a Total_Cost field and a Cost_PerArea field. The application does calculations on the back-end using the area of a polygon feature, and the user must only enter a value for one of these fields and then the other gets calculated. For example, a user could enter the cost per area and then the total cost would get calculated by multiplying the polygon area, or on the flip side a user could enter the total cost and then the cost per area would be calculated by dividing the polygon area. Pretty straightforward. So the business logic the survey needs to replicate is: - both fields visible initially - one has to be required - if one gets a value the other must become either read-only or disappear (I can use an if statement in the readonly column for one of the fields, but not both at the same time, I get a broken parser error otherwise I think that would be the solution) Any help would be greatly appreciated!
... View more
12-13-2019
02:14 PM
|
0
|
5
|
2976
|
POST
|
Upon a bit more testing, it seems like updating the itemsets.csv in the media folder only updates the *contingent* picklist, that is the lists that depend on the first list in a cascading select. The first list values seem to ignore what's in the itemsets.csv and honor only what's in the 'choices' tab. This is problematic as we need a way of updating all 3 lists participating in our cascading select, not just the second two!
... View more
11-27-2019
05:19 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1867
|
POST
|
Yes I set the project to use ArcPro Py3 as well as the interpreter. Still not importing arcpy, though I do see it in the 'intellisense' list when I type 'import ar...' It might be the offline licensing issue you mentioned with Pro. It looks like my organization has disabled that, but I can use Spyder and work with ArcPy without being signed into Pro...
... View more
11-27-2019
11:22 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1302
|
POST
|
I've been working through this procedure of updating the itemsets.csv files for published surveys. I have written a script that does this in Python 3 using the ArcGIS Python API. The script works great, but one issue I've noticed... When cascading selects are setup, the first select_one list must appear in the 'choices' tab of the xslx form, right? And the subsequent contingent select_one lists can go in the 'external_choices' tab. (At least it yells at me when I remove the first list from the 'choices' tab) Well the problem is that when I push an updated itemsets.csv to the survey that has different choices for the first select_one, those new choices appear but also the original choices remain. For example, if I published the survey with the first list question having Choice1, Choice2, Choice3, and then I run the script to update it and the newly updated first list question should be Choice2, Choice3, Choice4, what actually happens is the list has Choice1, Choice2, Choice3, Choice4 - which causes problems when you require the subsequent lists and selecting Choice1 means you get no choices for the second list. I thought I might be able to get away just having the first list name in the 'choices' tab with no values, and the survey should pull the values from the itemsets.csv/external_choices but that does not work. I would hate to have to have a 'dummy' placeholder value in those! Anyone have a workaround to this?
... View more
11-27-2019
11:19 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1867
|
POST
|
I've decided I don't really like developing in Spyder for Py3 stuff.. I went and got PyCharm, have done a bunch of internet sleuthing on how to use it with ArcGIS Pro's installation of Python 3 - sounds really simple, just configure the interpreter to your python.exe buried way down in the Pro folders.. Well I've done that and I can't import arcpy! It doesn't see it as a package. Anybody? Bueller... Bueller...
... View more
11-21-2019
05:23 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1302
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:25 AM
|