POST
|
Hi, I'm encountering the same issue with a much smaller vector tile package. Did you find any resolution?
... View more
03-21-2023
09:50 PM
|
0
|
0
|
398
|
POST
|
Yes, but also hoping to find explicit confirmation through help documentation I possibly overlooked or through someone who has experience navigating the limitations of different Desktop license levels where relationship classes are concerned. I would rather not add more standard level licenses than necessary to our account, especially if a solution is available through Online feature services, but I am pessimistic about my prospects for Desktop software.
... View more
01-04-2022
01:47 PM
|
0
|
1
|
679
|
POST
|
Thanks Amanda. I reviewed that particular help page before posting, but I found the discussion and functionality tables too general to answer my specific questions.
... View more
01-04-2022
01:22 PM
|
1
|
3
|
685
|
POST
|
Hi GIS Community, My organization relies on basic level desktop licenses for our work, but I am interested in upgrading one license to standard level to take advantage of relationship classes. I found documentation for ArcMap that suggests the rest of my GIS team using basic level desktop licenses will be unable to edit any feature classes participating in a relationship class. Is this true for ArcGIS Pro users as well? I am aware that relationship classes are supported by ArcGIS Online and mobile geodatabases. If I connected online feature services through a relationship class, would anyone on my GIS team using basic level desktop licenses be able to edit those feature services in ArcGIS Pro? What about editing those feature services live or in a offline scenario via mobile geodatabase in the Field Collector app for iOS - what kind of desktop licensing or Online user types are required for this kind of workflow? Thanks for any guidance you can provide.
... View more
01-04-2022
10:48 AM
|
0
|
5
|
712
|
POST
|
Hi GIS Community, My organization relies on basic level desktop licenses for our work, but I am interested in upgrading one license to standard level to take advantage of relationship classes. I found documentation for ArcMap that suggests the rest of my GIS team using basic level desktop licenses will be unable to edit any feature classes participating in a relationship class. Is this true for ArcGIS Pro users as well? I am aware that relationship classes are supported by ArcGIS Online and mobile geodatabases. If I connected online feature services through a relationship class, would anyone on my GIS team using basic level desktop licenses be able to edit those feature services in ArcGIS Pro? What about editing those feature services live or in a offline scenario via mobile geodatabase in the Field Collector app for iOS - what kind of desktop licensing or Online user types are required for this kind of workflow? Thanks for any guidance you can provide.
... View more
01-04-2022
10:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
294
|
POST
|
Hi GIS Community, My organization relies on basic level desktop licenses for our work, but I am interested in upgrading one license to standard level to take advantage of relationship classes. I found documentation for ArcMap that suggests the rest of my GIS team using basic level desktop licenses will be unable to edit any feature classes participating in a relationship class. Is this true for ArcGIS Pro users as well? I am aware that relationship classes are supported by ArcGIS Online and mobile geodatabases. If I connected online feature services through a relationship class, would anyone on my GIS team using basic level desktop licenses be able to edit those feature services in ArcGIS Pro? What about editing those feature services live or in a offline scenario via mobile geodatabase in the Field Collector app for iOS - what kind of desktop licensing or Online user types are required for this kind of workflow? Thanks for any guidance you can provide.
... View more
01-04-2022
10:30 AM
|
0
|
1
|
846
|
POST
|
Hi Jeff, can confirm. I'm actually in the process of converting my python label expressions to Arcade syntax.
... View more
06-11-2021
03:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3900
|
POST
|
Further inspection suggests the export issue has to do with at least one of several label classes created when I imported the layout from an existing ArcMap document. I discovered the map series exports fine with the python code when all label classes are disabled.
... View more
06-11-2021
02:11 PM
|
0
|
2
|
3903
|
POST
|
Thanks for running the code on your end Jeff. The confirmation that it worked was useful. I'm including a clip of the map series options window used in the layout. Nothing stands out, except the sort field... maybe. I did just run the tool on a layout in a different ArcGIS Pro project file with success, so I'll circle back and have a closer look at my map series settings in the project having issues. I'll probably export as a PDF series using the regular export layout function in Pro and see if I can get it to cough up an error to work with.
... View more
06-07-2021
02:35 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3961
|
POST
|
Can anyone in the ArcGIS Pro community help me understand why this tool I created in a python toolbox for exporting a page series as Jpeg files hangs up on map 1 of 37, but does not produce an error message? Map 1 is exported as a 4 kb jpg file when viewed in Windows Explorer, but cannot be opened. Meanwhile the tool continues running, without exporting additional files. Any guidance is appreciated - thank you! class exportPageSeriesAsJPG(object):
def __init__(self):
"""Define the tool (tool name is the name of the class)."""
self.label = "Export Page Series as JPGs"
self.description = ""
self.canRunInBackground = False
def getParameterInfo(self):
"""Define parameter definitions"""
param0 = arcpy.Parameter(name = "targetProject", \
displayName = "Target Project", \
datatype = "DEFile", \
parameterType = "Required",\
direction = "Input")
param0.filter.list = ['aprx']
param1 = arcpy.Parameter(name = "targetFolder", \
displayName = "Target Folder", \
datatype = "DEFolder", \
parameterType = "Required",\
direction = "Input")
param2 = arcpy.Parameter(name = "targetLayout", \
displayName = "Layout", \
datatype = "GPString", \
parameterType = "Required",\
direction = "Input")
param2.filter.type = "ValueList"
param2.filter.list = []
params = [param0,param1,param2]
return params
def isLicensed(self):
"""Set whether tool is licensed to execute."""
return True
def updateParameters(self, parameters):
"""Modify the values and properties of parameters before internal
validation is performed. This method is called whenever a parameter
has been changed."""
if parameters[0].value:
project = arcpy.mp.ArcGISProject(parameters[0].value)
parameters[2].filter.list = sorted([layout.name for layout in project.listLayouts()])
return
def updateMessages(self, parameters):
"""Modify the messages created by internal validation for each tool
parameter. This method is called after internal validation."""
return
def execute(self, parameters, messages):
"""The source code of the tool."""
import os
filePath = os.path.abspath(parameters[1].ValueAsText)
project = arcpy.mp.ArcGISProject(parameters[0].value)
layout = project.listLayouts(parameters[2].value)[0]
if layout.mapSeries.enabled:
for pageNum in range(1, layout.mapSeries.pageCount + 1):
layout.mapSeries.currentPageNumber = pageNum
arcpy.AddMessage("Exporting {0}".format(layout.mapSeries.pageRow.SITE_ID))
layout.exportToJPEG(os.path.join(filePath, f"{layout.mapSeries.pageRow.SITE_ID}.jpg"),300)
return
... View more
06-07-2021
09:18 AM
|
0
|
5
|
3988
|
POST
|
Has anyone duplicated the interactive field mapping behavior of the append geoprocessing tool dialog window in their own python toolbox? Seeking guidance on the use of the GPFieldMapping parameter.
... View more
08-05-2019
12:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
458
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 01-04-2022 01:22 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
04-11-2023
06:07 PM
|