Latest Contributions by JasonCamerano

Hey @SeanLyons  Great idea, in fact we have discussed this internally quite a bit but we always have lots of questions.  I would like to pose them to you and the community as well.  When tracing lines, if the tool allowed lines in opposite directions to be traced how would you expect that line be represented in the grid?  How would the lines COGO measurements be displayed in the Traverse Grid?  How would editing those specific lines directions work? We are very curious to what many users would expect to happen in the grid if we allowed reverse line tracing.  ... View more

I would verify that either Map Topology or GDB Topology are active on the Edit tab   ... View more

Hello @-_Ashley-B-Potter_-  Hopefully I'm understanding your question correctly.  You have a bunch of records that have features in them and you want to consolidate all those features into one record.  Here's what I would suggest.  Create the new record that you want everything to be associated to. Set that record as Active Open Manage Records and search for the records that have the features you want to move over to the newly created one In the manage records pane select all the records and then right click and choose Select Features in Records (use shift click to multi select) Now all the polygons, lines and points from all those records will be selected. Go to the records HUD and click the menu button and choose "Assign Selection To Record" Those features will now all be assigned to your newly created record.  You can now clean up those empty records by deleting them as necessary.  Let me know if this workflow accomplishes what you need.  - Jason Camerano ... View more

Well, some good news regarding that type of curve... At ArcGIS Pro 3.3 we have enhanced the Merge Collinear Lines tool to work with curves.  I selected those lines and ran the GP tool on them and it created a curve Only problem is you'll have to wait just a bit until 3.3 comes out in order to use the tool with the new functionality.  ... View more

Keep my power a secret!  I can edit code psychically through space and time and I can fix bugs through the cosmos 🙂  ... View more

@RobertChaney  Ah interesting.  I ran the delete identical on your data you provided me right now with SHAPE only.  I looked for a curve and luckily there was one and it has one curve that is still overlapping after.  I used the tool Highlight Gaps and Overlaps tool available on the Quality Tab in Pro I notice there are alot of gaps and overlaps along these curves Zooming to that curve that has the duplicate lines you'll notice there is a gap between the parcels so the lines technically aren't overlapping.    Examining that ArcMap Fabric these gaps and overlaps are all present there too.  I took a look at one of the areas where there are yellow gaps at the top and I noticed the parcel polygon geometry wasn't true curves along the line, they were still densified arcs.  I toggled on the Parcels Vertices layer and can see there are alot of extra verticies on the polygon. So what I did to fix this selected all the parcels in the cul-de-sac and clicked Shrink To Seed Once they were shrunk to seed I manually selected one of those 'duplicate lines' and deleted it I then ran Reconstruct From Seeds which rebuilt all those parcels I shrunk to seed (note: nothing happened to any of the attributes of that parcel) I ran the Highlight Gaps and Overlaps tool again and everything was all fixed.  No more gaps or densified arcs on the polygons.      ... View more

Hey@RickHollatz  I ran the script multiple times with a COGO line feature class that is participating in a topology and I was not able to reproduce the error.  Would you be able to send me a sample of your data so I could test it out? ... View more

Hey @RobertChaney  So I did some investigating of the data and here is what I found.  It doesn't look like the Distance rounding is the primary culprit.  It looks like it's the Direction field.  Let me start with what I think might be path forward for your data then I'll get into the nitty gritty of what is happening behind the scenes.  I would suggest not running the Delete Identical option during the Upgrade.  Instead, run it manually after upgrade is complete.  The Upgrade ArcMap tool simply runs the GP Delete Identical so running it after will be basically the same except you can control the fields it uses to compare more specifically.  If you do not care about the Direction and Distance field values, you can just run the Delete Identical tool and use SHAPE as the field it checks against. However, if you are concerned about the Distance fields you can run the delete identical against: SHAPE, DISTANCE, ARCLENGTH, and even CREATEDBYRECORD.  However you might need to round your distance fields to a lower decimal place, and if you don't want to modify the surveyed data you can create a new field and compute the Distance values over there and round the values in that field.  Then use that newly created field in the Delete Identical.  Let me know if that will be a good workflow for you! Ok... now for some nerdy numbers... When looking at the Direction field I noticed the decimal values went over 10 places.  And during the Upgrade ArcMap tool what happens if you choose to Delete Identical is that I will create two new fields; one that stores the Direction field minus 180 if it's a angle that is greater than 180 and two a distance field that is rounded to 4 decimal places.  I then use those two fields, plus the CREATEDBYRECORD, RETIREDBYRECORD and SHAPE field in the parameter for Delete Identical.  With that being said looking at the Direction Field, rounding to 6 decimal places the values still differed between the two lines.  Use these lines as an example You can see on the left the UpgradeDirectionMinus180 fields differ between the two lines.  And the Direction values that are stored have huge precision.  Seeing this makes me think that these full raw values aren't necessarily important to you so running Delete Identical simply against the shape of the line features might be a viable option for you.  Hopefully all this makes some sense.  Let me know if you have any other questions.  ... View more

Thanks, I got it.  I'll take a look.  ... View more

In ArcMap there is a GP Tool called Copy Parcel Fabric https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/parcel-fabric-toolbox/copy-parcels.htm You can select some parcels and run this tool.  Then send me that FGDB with the newly copied parcel fabric.  ... View more

Is there a way you could send me a small subset of your data so I can run it on my end?  I can take a look.  ... View more

That is correct that the GP Script tool doesn't look at map properties for field formatting as the tool can be run without any maps open.  One other thing you can do is modify the script.  Here are the steps: 1. Go to your Pro install location and browse to this fodler:  C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\Resources\ArcToolBox\Scripts Then find the FabricForArcMapToArcGISPro.py file 2. Copy that file to another location, like your desktop.  3. Right click on the file and Open it with Notepad or any other editor of your choice. 4. Once the file is open scroll all the way to the bottom and you will find a variable called IDENTICAL_ROUND_VALUE.  It is currently set to 4.  Change the 4 to what ever rounding value you decide 5.  Save you changes and close the editor 6. Copy and paste the .py file back to the original directory in step one and overwrite the existing file.  Let me know how this works out for you.  ... View more