Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About wilwaters
wilwaters
New Contributor III
since
10-02-2014
11-11-2020
28
Posts created
17
Kudos given
0
Solutions
17
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(1 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by wilwaters
|
IDEA
|
As shown in the attached image, the label leaders cross. I'm using Maplex. A search of the forums and help does not offer instruction how to set Maplex to avoid this. If I use standard labeling, one label loses a leader but at least the positioning makes sense: Please ensure Maplex does not produce overlapping leaders.
... View more
12-01-2016
12:18 AM
|
9
|
9
|
1998
|
|
POST
|
No idea. If it’s possible to do it with TINs though, do it. At least with other layers which could be surfaces, like .TIF files, have it as a step during adding it to the data frame that you can choose to use elevation values from that surface rather than automatically overlaying it on the surface defined already as ‘ground’. This message is the property of Amec Foster Wheeler plc and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates and is intended only for the named recipient(s). Its contents (including any attachments) may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law. Unauthorised use, copying, distribution or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited. We assume no responsibility to persons other than the intended named recipient(s) and do not accept liability for any errors or omissions which are a result of email transmission. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email to the sender and confirm that the original message and any attachments and copies have been destroyed and deleted from your system. This disclaimer applies to any and all messages originating from us and set out above. If you do not wish to receive future unsolicited commercial electronic messages from us, please forward this email to: unsubscribe@amecfw.com and include “Unsubscribe” in the subject line. If applicable, you will continue to receive invoices, project communications and similar factual, non-commercial electronic communications. Please go to http://amecfw.com/email-disclaimer for notices and company information in relation to emails originating in the UK, Italy or France.
... View more
12-14-2015
08:07 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1770
|
|
POST
|
I have a feature class of footprint polygons that I want to use to hard clip a TIN. I selected the footprint I wanted, then used that feature class in the Edit TIN tool. What resulted was the entire TIN having no nodes. This looks like the Edit TIN tool does not recognise selected records, and uses everything in the feature class being used to edit the TIN. This is because polygons for that feature class cover the entire TIN, so if I hadn't selected one and used that layer to hard clip the TIN then I'd expect it to result in no nodes. This has implications for a model I have created which iterates through rows of the footprints feature class. Now I need to add new steps to the model to export new feature classes for each row then clip by that new feature class. Please can Esri make the Edit TIN tool respect row selections in the feature class being used for TIN editing.
... View more
12-09-2015
08:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2713
|
|
POST
|
Hi Jeremy, Yes. For any type of surface added not just TINs. I see how there is a concept of 'ground' in ArcGIS Pro. I guess this doesn't exist in ArcScene. I want to easily be able to see the difference in elevation between surfaces that I add. If I have to laboriously go and stop a new surface I add being drawn on the elevation of another one then this makes the whole process frustrating. Wil
... View more
12-09-2015
08:29 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1770
|
|
POST
|
I was adding TINs. It was comical to see their colour symbology overlayed on another surface. I didn’t play with any rasters or other surface types. Basically, if a surface you’re adding to the 3D viewer has its own elevation information, automatically use that rather than a surface already in there. This message is the property of Amec Foster Wheeler plc and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates and is intended only for the named recipient(s). Its contents (including any attachments) may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law. Unauthorised use, copying, distribution or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited. We assume no responsibility to persons other than the intended named recipient(s) and do not accept liability for any errors or omissions which are a result of email transmission. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email to the sender and confirm that the original message and any attachments and copies have been destroyed and deleted from your system. This disclaimer applies to any and all messages originating from us and set out above. If you do not wish to receive future unsolicited commercial electronic messages from us, please forward this email to: unsubscribe@amecfw.com and include “Unsubscribe” in the subject line. If applicable, you will continue to receive invoices, project communications and similar factual, non-commercial electronic communications. Please go to http://amecfw.com/email-disclaimer for notices and company information in relation to emails originating in the UK, Italy or France.
... View more
12-05-2015
07:05 PM
|
0
|
6
|
1770
|
|
POST
|
yep, all good now. thanks for asking friendly internet stranger!
... View more
12-03-2015
05:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
660
|
|
POST
|
Hi Dan, Thanks for responding. Yes I don't know what happened. I did try joining it to the table output of the 'find duplicates' tool but it was taking too long so I cancelled the operation. There is currently no join therefore. Perhaps cancelling it caused the problem though. I have also been copying the whole file gdb from my network drive to a local drive a couple of times as I've been testing and performing things on a copy rather than the master version. If successful on the copy, I am then deleting the master and putting the copy back on my network drive. Perhaps amongst all of these cancelled joins and copying back and forth it became corrupted. Well, the order of the fields became mixed up. The points still display fine. The check geometry tool returns no errors. Wil
... View more
12-03-2015
01:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
660
|
|
POST
|
Hi Luke, I made a stupid mistake. The shape field was halfway down the list. Usually it is the first field, for some reason in this feature class it was somewhere in the middle of all the fields. Thanks for trying though. Wil
... View more
12-02-2015
11:04 PM
|
0
|
2
|
660
|
|
POST
|
I have a file .GDB with a feature class of topographic survey points. It's projected to Zone 38N. There are 108,278 points. The easting field is called EASTING, northing is NORTHING, elevation field is called PostExcZ and when I use the Add Z Information tool it adds the elevation values from PostExcZ. In the properties of the feature class it is listed as having Z values. Why then, does the Shape checkbox not appear in the list of fields to find duplicates in the Find Identical tool? I just ran this tool on my initial topographic survey feature class (1.4m points) and the Shape checkbox appeared. Without the Shape checkbox I am not sure what to do to find the duplicates. I selected the EASTING, NORTHING and PostExcZ fields but the resulting duplicates table had the same number of records as the input. This is wrong. Thanks, Wil
... View more
12-02-2015
06:32 AM
|
0
|
8
|
3261
|
|
POST
|
I really wanted to love ArcGIS Pro. I did in fact love the fact that it allowed for simultaneous viewing of 2D and 3D of the same layers. This is awesome. What is NOT awesome is when I add a surface I have to then laboriously go in to the settings of it and tell ArcGIS Pro that, yes, I indeed do what the base heights for that surface to come from that surface, not some other surface. It is silly frankly that ArcGIS Pro developers didn't want to assume that this is how the user would want the automatic response of this program to be upon a surface layer being added. I have never before when using for example ArcScene used the baseheights from another surface, essentially just putting for example the surface symbology from one surface onto another one. This doesn't make sense as a default option, yet this obscure way of operating is the default. Thank you for stopping being silly.
... View more
12-02-2015
01:52 AM
|
0
|
9
|
4766
|