|
POST
|
Hey Dave, thanks for the link! This will be a very useful tool. It just so happens that my municipality is located in Riverside County (Lake Elsinore). How has the county's parcel fabric migration gone? Is it complete or are there still areas that have yet to be migrated? Once it is complete, will there be a process for local municipalities within Riverside County to download their portion for inclusion in their own self-maintained parcel fabrics? (Sorry, not meaning to derail my own topic).
... View more
07-31-2019
12:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1316
|
|
POST
|
We have to work within similar constraints. Might just have to create a separate parcel type to differentiate between "legal" parcels and "actual" parcels.
... View more
07-31-2019
11:09 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1316
|
|
POST
|
Yeah, that was my thinking as well. What I am finding out is that in decades prior the city allowed developers to build public roads rough-shod over intervening parcels without going through an entitlement process to create ROW clearances for these roadways. In some cases they were just granted easements and in many others they didn't even bother with that.
... View more
07-30-2019
03:21 PM
|
1
|
3
|
2547
|
|
POST
|
Yes, of course. The issue is that after doing so, it because obvious how badly ROWs were actually managed by the city/county. Not so much a data problem, but a land use policy problem that stretches back decades. Just trying to figure out how we are going to clean this mess up.
... View more
07-30-2019
03:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2547
|
|
POST
|
Well, thanks for the vote of confidence. After removing the RoW polygons from my source parcel layer, I am finding that there are quite a lot of errors. Things like RoWs that are broken/incomplete, intersected by owner parcels, not the current path the RoW follows, or RoWs that are just straight up missing. Fun Stuff.
... View more
07-26-2019
04:58 PM
|
0
|
7
|
2547
|
|
POST
|
Awesome, thanks for these tips Anna!. They are definitely helpful in avoiding possible pitfalls. Those of us who have complex and legacy parcel geometries really have our work cut out for us.
... View more
07-26-2019
11:17 AM
|
0
|
9
|
2547
|
|
POST
|
Sorry if these questions have been asked before. If there is some documentation that already covers this, let me know. Anyway, I have read up quite a bit on Parcel Fabrics as implemented under ArcMap but never got around to actually creating one. Now that ArcGIS Pro has significantly expanded both the scope of how one can work with parcel fabrics along with the "ease" of creating one, I am looking at finally taking the plunge. That being said, I do have a couple of questions with respecting to preparing our data prior to using it for building the Parcel Fabric. My main parcel data source will be a polygon feature class provided by the county assessor that contains parcels and right-of-ways as polygons. My current questions are: 1.) What should we do with the right-of-way polygons? Do we leave them in the source parcel polygon FC and let them get imported into the Fabric along with the parcels or should they be removed first and imported via a separate process? Is best practice to use right-of-way polygons or it is better to use road centerlines instead (which I also have)? 2.) What do we do about complex and unusual parcel types, such as parcels that reside wholly within the boundaries of another parcel or that are broken up by intersecting parcels? Below is an example of the sorts of parcel geometries that I am having to deal with (right-of-way polygons are shaded in grey): Anyway, I am sure I will have more questions as I get more into the weeds on this project. If there is a better place where I should be asking these sorts of questions, please let me know. Thanks! Matt
... View more
07-25-2019
04:55 PM
|
0
|
17
|
4320
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 07-31-2019 11:09 AM | |
| 1 | 07-30-2019 03:21 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
07-14-2025
03:30 PM
|