|
POST
|
You mention a 'join' and 'portal', but didn't mention the version. Is this a hosted layer or Enterprise? I ask, as there is a bug in FMA ( BUG-000163548 - The ArcGIS Field Maps field app does not display pop-ups for a feature layer with a joined table from ArcGIS Enterprise 10.8.x.). I am using 10.9.1 and this is still an issue. The popup(s) work fine in map viewer (both of them), but is just ignored in FMA. In your case, I'm wondering if only the Arcade is coming up in the popup, but not the actual data? You could test to see if it is this issue by using the same layer in a map with no arcade, and see if the popup works in FMA or not. If it comes up, something else..... R_
... View more
Wednesday
|
0
|
2
|
122
|
|
POST
|
ESRI has had 'issues' with domain code/description/labels since it's inception. The most reliable way to get them to work 'consistently' and not confusing, is to make the code and description the same. Realize there are times where the description is too large and wieldy, but in most cases when the descriptions aren't too complex (i.e. Asphalt, Grass), this has been the easiest/ most robust way to go. This has made my job much simpler for the last couple decades R_
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
0
|
126
|
|
POST
|
Is your source data FGDB? I ask as I have yet to see the Repair Geometry function (though, I've not moved past 3.2.1 yet) actually work on enterprise data. It 'behaves' as if it worked, but nothing is checked/repaired. If you source data is eGDB, you might try copying to FGDB, then run the geometry checks. R_
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
127
|
|
POST
|
What is the source data? If eGDB, you may try to copy to FGDB first, then run the check geometry tool. My experience is that Check/Repair geometry still does not work on Enterprise data (even though it is supposed to). R_
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
208
|
|
POST
|
I believe by default, arcpy.Append_management does not include attachments. Try adding arcpy.env.maintainAttachments = True before you run the append. R_
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
1
|
1
|
224
|
|
POST
|
Not that I can really test as I am still using 3.1.3, and 3.2.1, but, in both of these versions, I am not seeing the issue. Any changes in the attribute table persist, even when closing/reopening or adding to new map. But, you mentioned 'clicking through all of them in the attribute window' suggests that you have them selected. Just to make sure you are aware, if you are making the same edit to multiple features, you can click the layer name in the attribute window and any changes made will be applies to ALL selected features at once. No need to click through them. Unless, of course, you are making 'different' edits to the features. R_
... View more
12-10-2025
02:05 PM
|
1
|
1
|
182
|
|
POST
|
It would need to know where to put the labels and a standalone table doesn't have a spatial component. You will want to label the Streets Centerline layer instead. If it doesn't include the street names in the table, but has a common ID between it and the table, you would want to join the standalone table to the Centerlines, then you would turn on and configure labeling for the Centerlines layer. Then, when you toggle on the Centerline featureclass, it will show the labels. R_
... View more
12-10-2025
11:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
179
|
|
POST
|
Sometimes see things like this with invalid/corrupt geometry. You could try the Check Geometry GP Tool in Pro to see if there are geometry errors. If so, you could run the Repair Geometry GP tool on the source data prior to overwriting the service. As always, with tools that modify the exiting data (Repair Geometry), recommend making a backup copy first. R_
... View more
12-09-2025
10:19 AM
|
0
|
2
|
317
|
|
POST
|
Not sure about templates, but you can package your map or project to a file that will retain your toolbox's and GDB's. R_
... View more
12-05-2025
01:12 PM
|
2
|
1
|
349
|
|
POST
|
Not an answer, but letting you know that AGO assistant is available in portal. It is just a webpage that will let you log into Portal (at least up to 10.9.1, suspect it works with newer versions). R_
... View more
12-05-2025
09:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
428
|
|
POST
|
Have not tested with ECW's, but have loaded 1400 jpegs, jp2's, and tiff's into mosaics without issue. I set the Input Data to Workspace and let it grab all the images in there rather than adding them all to the list individually. R_
... View more
11-12-2025
10:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
362
|
|
POST
|
<dyn type="user"/> for the logged in username. See here for other dynamic text available. R_
... View more
11-12-2025
10:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
174
|
|
POST
|
If you have access to the python API, I have used this method to add, delete or re-order the list. The domain list will honor the order of the dictionary used to update it. R_
... View more
11-05-2025
07:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
395
|
|
POST
|
Can't test at the moment, but you might be able to open the project in Pro, then run the script. Then you could look at the definition queries applied to the layers and see if they are valid? Might give an idea as to the issue. Sometimes it's just a small syntax issue and can sometimes take a bit to figure out the right coding to string a where clause together in the proper format. R_ Edit to add: It could also depend on what your data source is. If I set up a similar definition query in Pro on data from SQL Server through .sde connection file: dt_fld >= '2025-01-02 00:00:00' And dt_fld <= '2025-12-02 00:00:00' But in the same project, if I connect to a FGDB feature class, the same query becomes: dt_fld >= timestamp '2025-01-02 00:00:00' And dt_fld <= timestamp '2025-12-30 00:00:00' Neither of which have the 'date' in them. I remember seeing that before, so 'some' data source(s) must require it that way. Another reason to check the def queries in Pro itself after the script.
... View more
11-04-2025
12:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
337
|
|
POST
|
I used to have that issue back when running 2.x versions. It was related to Microsoft KB updates. Every time the system 'updated', I had to remove the updates from the computer to be able to change/modify the symbology without it crashing (which is a never ending cycle, and probably not the best for security). Believe 3.1 is when that issue was resolved if I remember correctly, but it's been a while. R_
... View more
11-04-2025
10:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
283
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 12-10-2025 02:05 PM | |
| 2 | 12-05-2025 01:12 PM | |
| 1 | 10-30-2025 04:04 PM | |
| 2 | 11-03-2025 02:33 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|