Latest Contributions by RyanUthoff

‎05-31-2026

As long as the collaborations are still functional, I don’t see any reason to redo the collaborations unless you really want them to reflect the correct version. I know restarts are a part of upgrading Portal, but it might be worth restarting both Portals and then initiating a manual collaboration sync if you haven’t done that already. I encountered an instance where an existing collaboration would not detect a new workspace that was created until Portal was restarted, even after doing manual syncs.

‎05-29-2026

Did support provide you any additional information about the bug? Like are all upgrades faulty, or just upgrades that meet certain conditions (like specifically upgrading from 11.5 to 12.1), etc.?

‎05-27-2026

If you're referring to ArcGIS Enterprise 12.1, then I would say not. I can't find any documentation about this for 12.1. It's not in the "What's New" documentation, and when I try to navigate to the 12.1 documentation from the 12.0 documentation, the link is broken. According to Esri's documentation, Esri does not include beta features in long-term support releases. Assuming it hasn't transitioned to full support yet, then it would not be included in 12.1.

‎05-27-2026

I'll start with the disclaimer saying that every organization is different, but I have a table that is versioned with 2.4 million records in it, with 17.3 million records in the archive table, and we don't have any performance issues with it. I don't think having a large archive table would impact the performance of a viewing the table in ArcGIS Pro. In this case since you are using a versioned feature class, it creates a separate archive table which ArcGIS Pro wouldn't be accessing when viewing only the feature class. Are you reconciling and compressing the database? That would be the first thing to look at imo. Also, when you reindex, make sure you're also doing the spatial index too and not just the attribute index. For your second question.......all I can say is to be very careful about that. I'm not going to say that it's impossible, but it is a table that Esri manages so you might experience unexpected behavior if you directly modify it.

‎05-27-2026

Ahh, that's a good catch. I didn't think to check that. I kept the default tiling scheme, which was "Auto-suggest." So I'm not sure what it actually chose when I originally published it. With that being said, I tried again just now with WGS 1984 and my local projection and it still published fine when I set it to ArcGIS Online tiling scheme. Yes, my data is coming from an EGDB.

‎05-27-2026

Does the account that is running Portal have full admin permissions to all of the various Portal directories? Including both your Portal directory in program files, along with the Portal content directory? I know that is super basic, but that is the first thing I think of when I see your error saying Portal can't open the file.

‎05-27-2026

I am also using Pro 3.5 and Enterprise 11.5 and in my experience, it is not mandatory for the projection to be Web Mercator. Just to make sure, I validated this just now. I was able to successfully publish a referenced vector tile layer where the underlying data is in three different projections (WGS 1984, Web Mercator, and my state's local coordinate system), and all three published fine for me. I'm not sure what went wrong in your specific case, but in general, it is not mandatory for the underlying data to be in Web Mercator.

‎05-15-2026

There are a couple ways you can track changes to your data. The first way would be to create an automated process to copy your data from AGOL into a local GDB of some sort. If you ever needed to revert back to an old record, you'd have all of the historical data. The second way would be to take advantage of the Extract Changes functionality. The support articles I listed below are referring to ArcGIS Enterprise, but you can also enable Extract Changes on an AGOL feature service as well. https://developers.arcgis.com/rest/services-reference/enterprise/extract-changes-feature-service/ https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/how-to-enable-extract-changes-on-hosted-referenced-feat-000036676 https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/how-to-recover-deleted-feature-from-a-hosted-feature-la-000037178 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/hosted-feature-layer-change-log-access/td-p/1156946 I've never needed to use Extract Changes before, but I just tried it on an AGOL hosted feature service and the functionality seems to work for me.

‎05-08-2026

I was curious about this so I tried to replicate your scenario in ExB. I was able to replicate it, and I can provide some insight on the query that ExB is actually using. First of all, you can validate this yourself by opening your ExB app and opening the query widget. Then, open up your browser's dev options to view the internet traffic. From there, you will be able to see the requests that ExB is sending to the server, which includes the query from the query widget. You might have to click a few of the requests to find the one you're looking for, but you will be able to see the query that ExB is sending. In your case, it appears that ExB is sending a query you're not expecting. This is the query: (County IN ('Lincoln')) AND (Era LIKE '%19th Century%') OR (Era LIKE '%20th Century%') Notice that if you select multiple eras, it is treating them separately (putting them in separate parenthesis) vs. the query that you are expecting it to be. So that is the root of the problem and why you're not getting the expected results. I don't know if this is by design or not. Honestly, I would have expected the same behavior you are expecting if I were to configure the SQL Expression Builder the same way you did. In my mind, if a person selects multiple eras, it should put that in one big parenthesis block instead of a parenthesis for each era. Edit: It looks like someone beat me to the solution lol. And bonus points for them for actually knowing why the problem is happening lol.

‎05-08-2026

Does your workflow require you to create a version for each downloaded map, even if it is for the same user? Or, would creating a single version per user (regardless of the number of times they download it) be an acceptable alternative? See here: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/prepare-feature-layer-data-for-offline.htm Regardless, based on the documentation I'm reading, it appears that you do need to delete the replica versions manually. Esri will automatically delete the feature service replicas, but not the actual version replicas that are associated with the feature service replicas. In fact, you won't be able to delete the version replica until the feature service replica has been deleted. Some helpful documentation: https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/latest/publish-services/windows/offline-maps-and-versioned-data.htm https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/geodatabases/overview/replica-versions-in-offline-workflows.htm

‎05-06-2026

When publishing a S123 form to Portal using S123 Connect, it creates a folder on your content page where it places the survey and the content associated with it. By default, Esri prefixes the folder name with "Survey-" (ex: Survey-Inspection Survey) When you delete a survey through S123 Connect, it will delete the associated survey folder. However, there is a specific scenario where S123 Connect will delete a different folder and not the associated survey folder. For some organizations, it is a common workflow to change ownership of S123 forms so other people can make changes and republish them. In this scenario, a user might change ownership of a survey and insert it into a different folder in their content. Note that this folder is NOT the original survey folder that was created when initially publishing the S123 form. After changing ownership, the person then downloads the form through S123 Connect so they can make changes and republish. However, in the event that the end user needs to delete the survey through S123 Connect, it will delete the folder the survey is currently located in and not the original "survey" folder that was created when the form was originally published. While S123 Connect gives you a warning that it will delete the survey and the survey folder (along with all of its contents), the wording is misleading as it indicates that it is going to delete the survey folder, which in my opinion, indicates the original survey folder that was created when originally publishing the survey. Here is the warning S123 Connect gives: An end user might place the survey in their own folder with other content in it. At this point, I would not consider this the "survey" folder. It's just a regular folder with content in it. And when you go to delete the survey through S123 Connect, it will delete everything in that folder, including non-S123 related content that you do not want to be deleted. This is incredibly dangerous. My idea is that Esri needs to clarify the wording S123 Connect provides when deleting a survey to indicate that it will delete the folder (and all of its content) that the survey is currently located in and not the "survey" folder which is a little vague and misleading.

‎05-04-2026

I don't think 12.0 was necessarily a re-architecture of anything where you'd absolutely have to be on Pro 3.6. The 12.0 release signifies more of a removal of features and functionality, like the classic map viewer, Web AppBuilder, etc. But generally, 3.6 and 11.5 should work pretty well together. Like I said, there could be new functionality released with 3.6 that isn't compatible with 11.5, but I'm not sure what that would be right off. One example that happened to me in the past was when Esri released high-precision date fields. We upgraded Pro but not Enterprise, and we couldn't publish feature services with high-precision date fields enabled. We could work around that by not using them, but that's just an example of a compatibility issue.

‎05-04-2026

Using the same version of Pro/Enterprise is best practice and is what is recommended, but generally, you should be okay if you use Pro 3.6 with Enterprise 11.5. The biggest concern would be any functionality released in 3.6 that isn't compatible with 11.5. From Esri's documentation: Although earlier and later versions of ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Enterprise work together for most functionality, pairing companion versions is recommended. When that isn't possible, staying within a range of two companion versions is recommended. The table below lists the companion versions. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/release-notes.htm

‎05-04-2026

I'm not sure if this would be an acceptable solution for you, but you might be able to do that through AGOL Notebooks. You'd be able to define your own SQL expression to calculate the Unique ID in the format you are needing. The downside is that the calculation wouldn't be immediate. The AGOL Notebook would run either on demand or on a schedule. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/auto-calculate-unique-id-in-hosted-feature-service/td-p/1153764 Attribute rules would be a good solution, but that only works on ArcGIS Enterprise and not AGOL unfortunately.

‎04-30-2026

If I entered an invalid value (according to the attribute rule) in the Editor widget form, would the attribute rule send an error message to the Experience Builder form? Yes, Editor widget form will give you an error message. What would the error message look like in the form? Is it a generic ExB error message, an attribute-rule-generated message, or a user-defined error message? Regardless of the error number/description you provide in ArcGIS Pro, the Editor widget form will only give you a generic error. See screenshot below. When would the error be thrown? When the value is entered into the field, or when the feature is saved? The error will be thrown when you click the "Update" button in the ExB form. It would be great if Esri would display the attribute constraint error you define in ArcGIS Pro in the map viewer (including ExB, etc.). I actually created an ArcGIS Idea about this last year. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/portal-map-viewer-should-display-attribute/idi-p/1629217

Online Status	Online
Date Last Visited	2 hours ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by RyanUthoff

Re: Collaborations & Updated Versions

Re: Portal for ArcGIS upgrade from 11.5 to 12.1 not working - service won't start after installation

Re: Item Details Assistant (AI) ?

Re: Excessive archive growth from duplicate/no-op history records — has anyone dealt with archive bloat?

Re: Issues with publishing vector tile layer to ArcGIS Enterprise

Re: Portal for ArcGIS upgrade from 11.5 to 12.1 not working - service won't start after installation

Re: Issues with publishing vector tile layer to ArcGIS Enterprise

Re: Tracking/Auditing/Safeguarding original GNSS points in AGOL

Re: Experience Builder Query Widget SQL Expression Builder AND with 'contains' not working

Re: What is the intended way to clean up after utilizing offline maps?

Clarify S123 Connect Wording when Deleting a Survey to Indicate it Deletes the Folder the Survey it is Currently in and not the Actual Survey Folder

Re: Upgrading to Enterprise 11.5 and need to use Pro 3.6 due to a Bug in 3.5.x Is this OK?

Re: Upgrading to Enterprise 11.5 and need to use Pro 3.6 due to a Bug in 3.5.x Is this OK?

Re: Use database sequence function from AGOL layer/table to generate unique integer IDs?

Re: Would a Portal/EGDB constraint attribute rule error message be passed to the ExB Editor widget?

Re: Limit the size of the ArcGIS Data Store

Re: Why Still Require a Security Question After In...

Why Still Require a Security Question After Instal...

Re: Best Practice to see video data via Online

Re: Best Practice to see video data via Online