Select to view content in your preferred language

Cost path values are smaller than cost surface

4225
12
Jump to solution
04-12-2015 05:38 PM
BayuWidyasanyata
New Contributor II

Hi All,

I'm recently do cost path calculations using cost distance and cost surface layer.

My cost surface values are between 1 to 19 (to simplify).

The result that made me confused was the final cost path surface really small, smaller than cost surface's.

Cost path values are around 0.00....

I use cost surface cell size of 30 m * 30 m.

And it calculated with model builder and python script which result the same values.

Is there anything I missed?

Thank you,

[bayu]

0 Kudos
12 Replies
BayuWidyasanyata
New Contributor II

Could you explain why it's in meters?

From what I understand, the cost path defines the "cost", real or might normalization cost. CMIIW.

DanPatterson_Retired
MVP Emeritus

sorry, I assumed distance...units then....

0 Kudos
BayuWidyasanyata
New Contributor II

OK. Thank you!

0 Kudos